[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 7040
Date: Thu Sep 23 14:41:49 BST 1999
Author: Wayne Sheppard
Subject: Bards vs Clerics in melee
> From: <kim@...>abilities.
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Wayne Sheppard wrote:
> >
> >
> > And Bards have much better battle skills than a cleric. It isn't even
> > close. Bards are much closer to Rangers than Clerics in combat
>We were talking melee capabilities, not magical. Otherwise you could argue
> Clerics are almost our
> defensive equivalent. Their melee skill is weaker (4 pts/lvl
> vs our 5 pts/lvl + dual wield), but their magical offensive
> capabilities more than make up for it.
> My L31 cleric friendWhy not use charm? Or why not kite it instead. Root and shoot is just like
> is easily able to solo battles using wrath, root, melee, and
> heal that I wouldn't stand a chance in at L35 (aside from
> using charm).
> From: Mike.Langlois@...abilities.
> Subject: Re: Re: Petiton to replace level 14 song
> >And Bards have much better battle skills than a cleric. It isn't even
> >close. Bards are much closer to Rangers than Clerics in combat
>don't
> I must defer to you in this, as I'm only 13th level with my Bard, so I
> know what kind of divergence occurs later. However, at my level, thecleric I
> party with is just as effective in melee as I am, and with a higher AC.Happens
> to be better right now, because she's using a cleric only magic weaponthat is
> pretty nice...but that's beside the point :)At low levels Clerics are decent in combat. But the higher they get, the