I would agree with the assessment that forage is not too low. And if it's
low at all, it's certainly not too low to be useful. I think it's perfect
for what they intended. They intended it to be not as good as a full
fledged forager would have. I forage way more than enough food, and just
slightly less than enough water to keep me alive. So I can forage enough
berrires and fruit and such to give to my brewing friends, and still have
plenty of food to eat. I don't mind that I have to buy water every so
often, since characters without forage at all have to do it a lot more
often. I think those who think it is useless are either too lazy to press
the button often enough, or have a case of sour grapes (or is that berries?)

Laluni Songhammer, Half-Elf bard of E'Ci Capped at 40 forage, and grateful
to have forage at all.

At 05:20 PM 9/24/99 -0500, you wrote:

>From: Talies the Wanderer <snicker@...>
>
>At 10:57 AM 9/24/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>From: Greg Gillan <GGillan@...>
>>
>>Okay, here's what I've got so far. Once again a reminder, I'm not looking
>>to send in an email asking for new features added, just for fixes to current
>>problems, or at least estimates on when we can expect things to be fixed. I
>>want answers, not changes.
>
>This all looks really good (although I'll stand by my belief in Forage not
>being too low). If no one has any oppositional posts by next week, I say
>send it.
>
>
>Talies the Wanderer
>Check out the EverQuesting Bard:
>http://amtgard.pinkpig.com/bards/eqbard.htm
>
>>

Steven S. Klug
-- sklug@...