[<a href='7395.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7393.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7395.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='7392.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 7394 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Sep 30 18:15:42 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> JasonF <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Hey this sounded interesting.. <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-911333203">Bards do not need bind and are not going to get it.  Group bind?  Absolutely<br/>
rediculous, although I sincerely salute the creativity of the orginal<br/>
alt.games.everquest poster&#39;s suggestion.  Can you imagine the uproar from the<br/>
other classes (especially melee) if we got GROUP BIND?<br/>
<br/>
The one hope that I would extend to my fellow bards that can&#39;t seem to come to<br/>
grips with the fact that they don&#39;t need bind is that the Expansion Pack will<br/>
probably have to have 25 new songs in it for levels 51-75.  Maybe you guys<br/>
will get a bind affinity song in there somewhere, but I doubt it.<br/>
<br/>
Crier Sharpsong - happlily Selo&#39;ing her way across two or three zones to<br/>
retrive her corpse<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Jason A. Farqu´┐¢<br/>
CDI at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.pigging.com/">http://www.pigging.com/</a><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; Bard&#39;s Bind would have a lengthy casting time instead of the usual &quot;3.0&quot;.<br/>
&gt; And it would use mana, and a component (a piece of ore, or maybe some other<br/>
&gt; item which would fuel a bit of economy). </span></blockquote></div>