[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7396
Date: Thu Sep 30 19:08:00 BST 1999
Author: Lange, Stephen
Subject: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..


> From: Greg Gillan <GGillan@...>
>
> We are not getting bind. We will never get bind and we have less need for
> bind than any other class, considering the rate at which we run.
> Talies, please KABONG this before this whole arguement starts up yet
again.
> I think most people are sick of hearing it by now

Why kabong it? The person had a well thought out idea, dont step on my first
amendment right to free speech just because you have heard other lame
excuses for why we should get bind.

It was an idea that could blossom into possibily stimulating trade, hell
make the reagent needed to sing it specific to each of the new foraged foods
that have put in per zone, take it a step further and make that agent need
to be baked into a high level item, or brewed into a high level item to be
usable.

Its an interesting idea. And dont make assumptions for everyone else on the
list, they mayt not be sick of it.