>This is why I am weary of this subject. Your assumption below is based on
the
>premise that a petition could be considered "well thought out and logical"
by
>everyone. People that are against any changes in the bind policy will never
see
>any petition as "well thought out and logical".
Very good point. From what I have gathered, it seems the biggest complaint
about giving a melee class the ability to bind, or be bound by a caster, is
that it would change the fighting dynamic. And it obviously would. That
being said, the one major point that has not been proposed by other players
is a sense of difficulty or loss with getting a melee player bound.
Add in song difficulty and reagents, coupled with real EXP loss to the
person getting bound (2 full bubbles of lost exp would really make a melee
person question getting bound or not, of course the song singer should take
considerable less exp loss :=) ). and the argument becomes less clear.
Just my 2 cents.