[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7441
Date: Thu Sep 30 23:03:25 BST 1999
Author: Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)
Subject: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..


bards are tough to categorize. if it comes down to it and a gun is put to
my head, i'll say we are hybrids and i think verant says the same. since we
bards are such a mixture of everything, let's take bards out of the
equation. now as far as the definition of hybrid: The offspring of the
union of two distinct species (or classes in this case). by definition you
can not classify shaman, cleric, or druid as hybrids. this is not an
opinion. SHD, RNG, PAL are hybrids. the priests are not. bard is the only
room for discussion. can we put this hybrid thread to rest? talk about
binding is fine, let's just not talk about who is or is not a hybrid. it's
obvious. it's not what your abilities are, it's where your class came from.
only those 3, and maybe bard, are a combination of two other classes.

Shada D'ukal, Level 50 Wood Elf Bard
Erisi Dlarit, Level 24 High Elf Paladin
Tyria Sarkin, Level 22 High Elf Wizard
Mithaniel Marr Server


> From: "Kimes, Dean W." <Dean_Kimes@...>
>
> If that's your logic why are bards rogue/enchanters? We
> cannot enchant
> anything. We have pathetic unuseable rogue abilities. We
> are hardly a
> combination of the two unless Andy Warhol is a deity in this
> world too.
>
> Kookoocachoo I am the Diceman