this is it for me for the day. going to actually try to play barring
unforeseen griffene tupperware parties at zone lines. I think at some point
Verant will have to decide how to keep players in the game who have less
time to play on a regular basis and still keep those more fortunate ones
who can play more interested. Those with more time run out of challenges,
those with less time are challenged to advance. They only have so many
resources, if they don't address this issue they will lose a valuable part
of the player base either way you look at it. What is going to happen when
Kunark comes online with an evil city? Will there be a place for the good
races to bind or will Verant see it as a challenge for good players to
adventure there since its a boat ride from their nearest reasonable bind
point if they aren't a binder? Given their lack of forethought in some
other areas I am not convinced they will deal with this issue well.

Kitasi of E'ci

-----Original Message-----
From: Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)
[mailto:Michael.Garramone@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 6:05 PM
To: 'eqbards@onelist.com'
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Hey this sounded interesting..

From: "Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)" <Michael.Garramone@...>

the same for Kitasi, and i do understand. and like you said, i play more
and thus can not relate to death in the same way.

Shada

> As I have said before, for casual gamers who don't get
> to play EQ
> that much, not being able to bind in non-cities has a major
> impact. When I
> die, that pretty much writes off the rest of the gaming
> session for me.
> Thats why I support a change to the policy.
>
> Galtin of E'ci