[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7553
Date: Fri Oct 1 16:26:19 BST 1999
Author: Rokenn Swiftsong
Subject: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..


>From: "Blair, Keith (Keith Blair)" <kblair@...>
> > Clerics, Druids, and shaman are priest classes.
>
>Ok let's go with that. What is that?
>
>They can cast spells.. Caster.
>They can use weapons and armor.. Fighter.
>
>Sorry, from what I can tell that's a hybrid. If you
>want to call it a priest, then I'd say a priest is
>a hybrid. If Clerics, Druids or Shamen aren't
>hybrids because they're priests and get their powers
>from their dieties, then a Bard isn't a hybrid either
>because their power comes from music. NO other class
>does that.
>
>You're claiming that "preists" aren't hybrids because
>of *where* their abilities come from. Thinking along
>those lines you simply can not disagree that a Bard
>wouldn't be a hybrid because of where HIS abilities
>come from like no other.
>
>The fact is that they have multiple abilities from
>other different classes just like a Bard does.

This whole conversation about was is/isn't a hybrid is pointless. Under
Verant's system Druids, Clerics, and Shamans are NOT hybirds.
The Hybrid classes are Rangers, Paladins, Shadow Knights, and Bards.
End of discussion.

Can we please KABONG the whole what is/isn't hybrid thread? The binding
arguement is creating enough email as it is :p

Rokenn Swiftsong - Karana server
Master Craftsmen of Societus Argenti