Agreed, if anything it puts Bards smack dab in the middle. But at the
levels at which bind becomes available to all those people below us on your
list, I would argue some of them could beat us in simple melee, hell they
have sure beaten me.
Kitasi
-----Original Message-----
From:
kim@... [mailto:
kim@...]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 9:59 AM
To: '
eqbards@onelist.com'
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Hey this sounded interesting..
From: <
kim@...>
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
>
> My point was they are as much of hybrids as bards because they also have
> reasonably strong melee skills/abilities, but not as strong as
> rangers/paladins/shadowknights (neither do bards) and good casting
> abilities. It really applies more to clerics and shamans as druids are
more
> limited by their poor armor.
In terms of melee vs. casting ability, I'd say:
Strong melee
------------
Warrior
Monk
Paladin, shadowknight
Ranger
Bard
Cleric
Shaman
Druid
Wizard, necro, mage, enchanter
--------------
Strong casting
Where you draw the lines in the above chart to "categorize"
classes is completely arbitrary.
--
John H. Kim
kim@...