[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 7604
Date: Fri Oct 1 20:22:19 BST 1999
Author: Reece, Tom - 25IDL G4
Subject: RE: Melee binding compromise (was:RE: Hey this sounded interesting..)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rokenn Swiftsong [SMTP:rokenn@...]
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 6:05 AM
> To: eqbards@onelist.com
> Subject: Melee binding compromise (was:RE: [eqbards] Hey this sounded
> interesting..)
>
> From: "Rokenn Swiftsong" <rokenn@...>
>
> >From: <kim@...>
> >On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Blair, Keith (Keith Blair) wrote:
> > >
> > > > How about just having us re-pop with say 50HP
> > >
> > > Not a bad idea, but 30-50% health would be better
> > > in my personal opinion. 50 hp to a high level
> > > player out of their total of over 1000 would
> > > simply be unrealistic. But it's a good idea
> > > all the same.
> >
> >50 hp would certainly make casters think twice about binding
> >outside of city zones. :-)
> >
> >--
> >John H. Kim
> >kim@...
>
> How is this for a compromise. When you respawn you have the current rez
> effect, plus you only have 10% of your max HPs. Then change the binding
> rules to allow casters to bind anyone, anywhere (with a yes/no box). I
> feel
> this would balance the risk/reward factor, and make it so people could not
>
> use suicide binding tactics when fighting Dragons and such.
>
> Rokenn Swiftsong - Karana server
> Master Craftsmen of Societus Argenti
>
>