Heh well you seem to forget the priests and Bards obviously don't fit
intothat. The Priests are healers which in itself is it's own category.

Naeeldar

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Keith (Keith Blair) <kblair@...>
To: eqbards@onelist.com <eqbards@onelist.com>
Date: Friday, October 01, 1999 9:14 AM
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Hey this sounded interesting..

>From: "Blair, Keith (Keith Blair)" <kblair@...>
>
>> in order to be a hybrid, you must be a
>> combination of 2 classes (thus the term
>> hybrid). only SHD, PAL, RNG can be
>> classified in this way. you can not name
>> 2 classes that make up cleric, shaman,
>> druid.
>
>Pure Caster = Wizard, Magician, Enchanter
>Pure Fighter = Warrior
>
>Anything else is a hybrid (in my opinion,
>although Verant does not agree).
>
>A cleric could easily be considered a hybrid
>of a fighter and a mix of the 3 caster classes.
>A shaman, even more so a part of the fighting
>class and perhaps a mix of the enchanter.
>
>A cleric is not a pure casting class, nor is
>a shaman. They can both bind.
>
>> bard is a toss-up, but if it comes
>> down to it can be classified a hybrid just
>> by default not being in another category.
>
>With this logic, then you must also agree that
>a cleric and a shaman are hybrids as they by
>default do not belong in the pure caster or the
>pure fighter categories.
>
>You are either a caster, a fighter or a mix.
>
>>