[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 7710
Date: Mon Oct 4 18:07:01 BST 1999
Author: jhenders@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: Hey this sounded interesting..
> From: Miriana <miriana@...>Doubt all you want, but if you think a naked bard with a spare weapon in
>
> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 jhenders@... wrote:
>
> > I'd probably keep myself bound in a city. But then I play with clerics,
> > so I haven't run back to my corpse in months. Corpse recovery is much
> > more an issue than mere running for your corpse at higher levels.
>
> Actually I doubt it. If you were fighting in a dungeon, why would
> you leave yourself bound in a city and make the easiest way of getting
> back to your corpse a cleric res? That would be silly, especially since
> you pointed out that corpse retrieval is much more of the issue. If you
> were in a group, and they need you to help out with retrieval, why would
> it be in your best interest to waste 30 minutes of the group's time and
> 600 mana for the druid to go over their, pick you up to the nearest gate,
> and wait as you run the rest of the way back.
> No one is saying there aren't other options other than runningAt higher levels an unarmored and weakly armed player is more of a
> from freeport to lower guk at the later levels. However, if you have the
> option of binding yourself right outside the dungeon, you'd be silly not
> to do it. After all, you can't gate, so the bind is only really useful if
> you die.