[<a href='7824.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7822.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7824.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='7822.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 7823 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Oct  5 06:04:37 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Talies the Wanderer <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Binding or not... <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2008313974">At 10:54 AM 10/4/99 -0700, you wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;At least on our server, the GM&#39;s have told us that using that way in to<br/>
&gt;do a Vox raid would be considered an exploit. They do have a huge agro<br/>
&gt;range too. On our server, we&#39;ve managed Nagafen, but Vox kicked our<br/>
&gt;butts.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>What?!?!?!!!<br/>
I&#39;m sorry, but THIS I don&#39;t understand.  Now they want to say that using a<br/>
DIFFICULT TO ACCESS &quot;secret entrance&quot; is an EXPLOIT!?<br/>
<br/>
Okay, so, using invisibility to sneak past an aggro mob should be an<br/>
exploit, and so should using your sword if the mob doesn&#39;t have one.<br/>
<br/>
Good ghod!  Is there no end?!  If I hear so much as a breath of something<br/>
this inane on my server, I will probably sign off.  For good.  That&#39;s just<br/>
too far, I&#39;m sorry.  If they didn&#39;t want the hole to be there, they<br/>
wouldn&#39;t have built it.<br/>
<br/>
*sheesh*<br/>
<br/>
Talies the Wanderer<br/>
Check out the EverQuesting Bard:<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://amtgard.pinkpig.com/bards/eqbard.htm">http://amtgard.pinkpig.com/bards/eqbard.htm</a></div>