[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7832
Date: Tue Oct 5 14:40:37 BST 1999
Author: Rokenn Swiftsong
Subject: RE: Binding (sigh)


>From: "Blair, Keith (Keith Blair)" <kblair@...>
>Reply-To: eqbards@onelist.com
>To: eqbards@onelist.com
>Subject: RE: [eqbards] Binding (sigh)
>Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 07:08:04 -0600
>
> > No, it's not an argument, but it really does end the
> > conversation. No matter how you or anyone feels about
> > it, and we've seen many many long winded posts, Verant
> > won't do it. Period. All that's left is pointlessly
> > arguing over why Verant "should".
>
>Eeent. Next contestant please. You're wrong. Period.
>
>They said rearrangable spellbooks (my favorite example
>at the moment) would never happen. Guess what..
>

No Brad said in an interview that the programmer in charge of that said it
would be a lot of work, not that it would never happen. My guess is when
he/she started working on it the programmer found a simpler solution.


Rokenn Swiftsong - Karana server
Master Craftsmen of Societus Argenti