[<a href='7838.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7836.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7851.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='7813.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 7837 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Oct  5 15:17:14 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Sheldon, Colin <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: Hey this sounded interesting.. <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-598362155">&lt;snip&gt;<br/>
  Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:30:11 PDT<br/>
   From: &quot;Reid _&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:re1d@...">re1d@...</a>&gt;<br/>
Subject: Re: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..<br/>
<br/>
Most casters I know have less problem moving through zones than melee&#39;ers <br/>
because of their ability to invis/camou.  An ability they have after 3 <br/>
seconds of rememorizing the spell.<br/>
<br/>
Does that affect your point at all?<br/>
<br/>
&lt;snip&gt;<br/>
<br/>
Not really, but I see where you&#39;re coming from. Not all casters get<br/>
invis/camo (CLE, SHA, NEC), and Wizards don&#39;t get it until level 16, so it<br/>
this is not a universal answer for casters.<br/>
<br/>
Regardless, your point makes a case for why casters may not need to be able<br/>
to bind anywhere, not for why melee classes can&#39;t live without bind/binding<br/>
anywhere, which is the argument I have been trying to counter.<br/>
<br/>
I hope my threads haven&#39;t been digressing to far away from bards.  If so, my<br/>
apologies.<br/>
<br/>
Ranulf<br/>
Tunare Server</div>