Of course, you could look at juggling as singing a medley. Since both tunes
are in the compilation, both effects are present.Since this is a game, and
not real life, we don't have the option of linking the songs to make musical
sense. But we can view the bard as having done so in the game. We just have
to deal with the odd implementation in RL(i.e. alternating buttons, vice a
linked string of different tunes).

Or, you could imagine that using two songs together is actually a third,
totally different song with a melody, and countermelody. I know I've sung
choral tunes with this structure.

Just a couple of options for viewing juggling in an RP sense, rather than
just a game mechanic.

Kristian Leitzen wrote:

> From: Kristian Leitzen <kleit@...>
>
> I am also a RL musician, and i don't think that anyone, no matter what
> you try to say on here, sings one verse of one song, then one verse of
> another song, then the second verse of the first song, then the second
> verse of the second song, etc. if you do then you are annoying the
> hell out of everybody. this is what i mean when i say that a bard
> wouldn't do it. a bard is proud of his singing and wouldn't want to
> appear foolish even if it did boost his stats. this is all IMHO by the
> way. everyone is free to their own opinion.
> Olczyk
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <dean_witcraft@...>
> > To: <eqbards@onelist.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 12:50 PM
> > Subject: [eqbards] juggling justified
> >
> >
> > > From: dean_witcraft@...
> > >
> > > The juggling is EXACTLY what I do as a RL solo
> > club musician. It isn't
> > the song that continues when you stop singing. It's
> > the EFFECT that the
> > song has on you. When I sing a sad song, the
> > listener doesn't stop feeling
> > sad immediately after I stop singing. It's this
> > *effect* that carries over
> > into the next song. If the next song is a
> > toe-tapper, the audience may
> > still feel a little sad for a while even as they
> > start tapping.
> > >
> >
> >