[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 7870
Date: Tue Oct 5 20:36:36 BST 1999
Author: Naeeldar
Subject: Re: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..
>From: "Sheldon, Colin" <Colin.Sheldon@...>my
>
>
><snip>
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:30:11 PDT
> From: "Reid _" <re1d@...>
>Subject: Re: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..
>
>Most casters I know have less problem moving through zones than melee'ers
>because of their ability to invis/camou. An ability they have after 3
>seconds of rememorizing the spell.
>
>Does that affect your point at all?
>
><snip>
>
>Not really, but I see where you're coming from. Not all casters get
>invis/camo (CLE, SHA, NEC), and Wizards don't get it until level 16, so it
>this is not a universal answer for casters.
>
>Regardless, your point makes a case for why casters may not need to be able
>to bind anywhere, not for why melee classes can't live without bind/binding
>anywhere, which is the argument I have been trying to counter.
>
>I hope my threads haven't been digressing to far away from bards. If so,
>apologies.
>
>Ranulf
>Tunare Server
>
>>