[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7895
Date: Tue Oct 5 21:53:38 BST 1999
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: Twinking


I bet this is the way it is. I tried hitting my 35th level monk friend with
a newbie ranger in the Arena in Qeynos and logged it. 343 attacks and zero
hits. We want to try again with 10 or so newbies and see if there is an AC
reduction for multiple attackers!

-----Original Message-----
From: kim@... [mailto:kim@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 2:53 PM
To: 'eqbards@onelist.com'
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Twinking


From: <kim@...>

On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
>
> An open-ended roll would acount for the extremes without messing up the
fit
> from a straight subtraction. that means if you were 96% sure you would
> instantly be 146% sure on the average, heh heh.

Well yes, but I was thinking more in terms of 1000 AC vs 1 Atk
not being 100% guaranteed to prevent being hit, while at the
same time 1 AC vs. 1000 Atk does not 100% guarantee a
successful hit. If you went with straight subtraction, you'd
have to apply a cutoff, beyond which extra AC or Atk just
doesn't matter. The few pieces of EQ's underlying number
system strongly suggests Verant wouldn't go for such a simple
solution.

--
John H. Kim
kim@...