[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7903
Date: Tue Oct 5 22:20:58 BST 1999
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..


Not sure about Shaman's getting camo, but they get SoW at 9th which among
melee classes is only comparable to Bard's Acellerando. I agree it isn't
critical that binding be the same throughout the classes, but it would be
equitable. Had a good laugh last nite. actually saw 2 different groups
/auctioning in S Karana for tanks. One group went so far as to offer double
looting for any tank that would join them. They were still auctioning an
hour and a half later. Still think people aren't bolting from tanks to
binders? At least on E'ci its happening.

Kitasi

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheldon, Colin [mailto:Colin.Sheldon@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 2:57 PM
To: eqbards@onelist.com
Subject: [eqbards] RE: Hey this sounded interesting..


From: "Sheldon, Colin" <Colin.Sheldon@...>


<snip>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 15:36:36 -0400
From: "Naeeldar" <jackal@...>
Subject: Re: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..

Um Necros get it (invisibility) at level 8 and shamans get it at 29 I think.

Naeeldar
<snip>

Hmmm....you're right about necros -- Gathering Shadows they call it -- my
mistake. I wondered why they had been zeroed out. Don't know about shamans.
I know they don't get it before 20, and the one spell list I have seen that
has spells up that high didn't have it listed. However, even if it is there
at 29, it is a long time to go before you get it.

Again, though, this is still irrelevant to my main premise, which is that
there isn't a compelling need for melee classes to be able to bind or bind
anywhere. I can't argue that it wouldn't be more convenient, because it
would be, I just don't believe that it is critical.

Ranulf