[<a href='8607.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='8605.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='8605.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 8606 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Oct 13 18:30:25 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Robert Roy <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Digest Number 433] <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-152123851">It definately matters.  Anytime you ever give anything at all to an NPC, and<br/>
that item is stackable, you should split them up into separate &quot;boxes&quot;.  Just<br/>
like making things with trade skills, EQ register&#39;s stacked items in a trade<br/>
(or a combiner) as a single item, so in this case, you&#39;d lose a ruby (and that<br/>
would suck).<br/>
<br/>
Mikal Stormsong 23rd song<br/>
Rathe<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;My question regards getting the product of a lambent stone and a gem. For <br/>
 </span></blockquote>example if i want a Lambent star ruby i must give the NPC ( can&#39;t recall the<br/>
name ) 2 star ruby&#39;s and a lambent stone. So my question is , do i give the<br/>
rubies to him/her stacked ( only taking up 1 trade box ) or seperate ( using<br/>
2) ? Or does it even matter ? I just really have zero interest in screwing<br/>
this up , any and all opinions are welcome .<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
____________________________________________________________________<br/>
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://webmail.netscape.com">http://webmail.netscape.com</a></div>