[<a href='9122.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='9120.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='9123.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='9118.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 9121 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Oct 26 20:56:52 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Queen of Fools <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1514878925">On Tue, Oct 26/99, John Robertson &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:johnr@...">johnr@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; From: John Robertson &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:johnr@...">johnr@...</a>&gt;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; This is very common. The first thing I tell newbies in EQ to do is to move that &quot;a&quot; binding<br/>
&gt; somewhere else (I use ~).<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>This was a real common key that a lot of people I knew used and<br/>
recommended to others (especially those who rebound movement keys to the<br/>
wasd block). Worked fine in beta and even in release, until Verant<br/>
decided to put the transparent toggle on ~. Man did that drive me crazy.<br/>
I kept attack there for a week or two, suffering through the constant<br/>
toggling of transparent mode until I finally broke down and moved it.<br/>
Then, just as I started to get used to the new key, they released a<br/>
patch that allowed you to rebind the transparent toggle. GRRR!!!!.<br/>
<br/>
I don&#39;t understand why their interface developer has to be /feedbacked<br/>
to make every new key he adds configurable. How much extra work can it<br/>
be?<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>