[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 9296
Date: Thu Oct 28 18:04:34 BST 1999
Author: Bobby
Subject: Re: Newbie questions


Well my main purpose for prefering a target spell interupter is because me
and my enchanter friend ALWAYS group togeather
and their area mez spell works AWSOME. If I area lulled, when they came out
they would not be happy or mezzed anymore. We RARELY take on ONE mob usually
its a couple fanatics prots etc.. he area mez we all /assist on the main
tank and take one at a time..


Tuldar
-----Original Message-----
From: kim@... <kim@...>
To: eqbards@onelist.com <eqbards@onelist.com>
Date: Thursday, October 28, 1999 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Newbie questions


>From: <kim@...>
>
>On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Bobby wrote:
>>
>> Question: I just got Pixie strike and was looking forward mostly to its
>> spell interupting ability, which seems to work really well. I being 28th
now
>> grouped with a 40th bard who was lookign for the mudwater rune. He stated
he
>> keeps Lucid lull or Lament armed for spell interuption. Thats the
question
>> does the target or area lull songs interupt spells extremely well.
>
>A lot of people never bothered with Pixie Strike because it's
>targeted. That means you either have to be very good at
>switching which mob you've targeted, or you keep one mob
>targeted and don't use your weapons (attack). I know a lot of
>bards just use Lullaby instead to avoid the targeting hassle.
>
>--
>John H. Kim
>kim@...
>
>>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to toren@...
with the subject lol.
>