[<a href='942.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='940.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='940.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 941 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu May 20 21:03:37 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jay schultze <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: OT: Enchanters <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1910327405"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;Just wanted to comment that my other character is an enchanter, and I<br/>
&gt;seriously have to disagree here.  I have NEVER grouped, soloed the entire<br/>
&gt;way, and have levelled about twice as fast as my Bard.<br/>
&gt;Enchanters start to suck at higher levels, because the resistance system is<br/>
&gt;messed up, so enchanters are getting large numbers of resists vs. green<br/>
&gt;creatures currently.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Just my two cp<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Talies the Wanderer<br/>
&gt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://amtgard.pinkpig.com/bards/eqbard.htm">http://amtgard.pinkpig.com/bards/eqbard.htm</a><br/>
&gt;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I find this really sad. During beta enchanters were very rare (well, high <br/>
level enchanters, anyways), but always a welcome addition. My dream party <br/>
combo would include an enchanter for sure.<br/>
I think my favorite mix for a full party is something like: A paladin or <br/>
ranger or warrior (preferably a ranger or paladin), Cleric, Bard, Enchanter, <br/>
Wizard, Druid. 2 spellchuckers, 2 healers, and 1 and 1/2 tanks =)<br/>
I think it works very well.<br/>
<br/>
Sartori of Kelethin<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
_______________________________________________________________<br/>
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.msn.com">http://www.msn.com</a></div>