[<a href='9800.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='9798.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='9762.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 9799 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Nov 10 18:03:59 GMT 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> silky@xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: Missing bard songs (was Updated Song Analysis 21+) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-297214779"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;Other than that I can&#39;t see what they have in mind.  There is little need<br/>
&gt;for an upgrade to most of our existing songs, upgrade to hymn highly<br/>
&gt;unlikely to ever occur.  I still greatly doubt that a high level binding<br/>
&gt;song would be unbalancing.  Given the lack of knowledge other classes have<br/>
&gt;about bards, if it was self only most people would never even know it<br/>
&gt;existed.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>If I had a plat for every time I&#39;ve been ask to bind - or sow - I&#39;d be one<br/>
rich bard.<br/>
<br/>
Note - this is usually asked as I have a lute in my hand.</div>