[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 9855
Date: Thu Nov 11 00:53:50 GMT 1999
Author: jay schultze
Subject: Re: Casters vs platemail wearers (was AC Dilemma)
>From: "Reece, Tom - 25IDL G4" <g4mntofcr@...>Welp, things may have changed (I did miss out on the first 2 months of
>Reply-To: eqbards@onelist.com
>To: eqbards@onelist.com
>Subject: [eqbards] Casters vs platemail wearers (was AC Dilemma)
>Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:26:00 -1000
>
>Sartori,
>
>I want to believe that you are 100% correct. However, gonna put on the
>devil's advocate hat here for the sake of discussion.
>
>First: There is a big difference between the AC of a caster and the AC of
>someone wearing platemail, especially if they are the same level. The only
>way a caster will have a higher AC over a plate wearing class is if they
>are
>higher in level and get the benefit of a higher Defense skill rating. In
>the observations where you have seen casters getting hit for more damage
>than plate wearers, were the casters a lot higher in level or similar in
>level to the plate wearing classes? If they were a lot higher in level and
>therefore, in theory, had AC values that were close to one another, then
>the
>fact that the caster was getting hit for more damage than the platemail
>wearer could be attributed to the platemail deflecting part of the blow.
>If
>the caster and platemail wearer were similar in levels, I don't think you
>can compare the two. The platemail wearer would almost certainly have had
>a
>higher AC than the caster and therefore shouldn't have been hit for as much
>damage.
>
>Second, there have been so many patches since beta who's to say that
>changes
>made in beta are still in effect?
>
>I grant that you have a lot more first hand experience than I have (my only
>character is 26th level) and you may be very well correct. But like I said
>earlier, I haven't seen an analysis posted anywhere, even on this list,
>that
>had conclusive evidence that armor type can deflect part of the blow.
>Everything I have read indicates that the only thing that matters is total
>AC. If you or anyone else knows where an objective analysis with hard data
>is posted on this topic I would like to read it.
>
>Thanks
>Galtin of E'ci