# Collection Plan Template Copy this to plan a collection effort before running any discipline. The plan turns the compendium from a course into an operation: fill the six instantiation variables, pick the two or three disciplines that feed your decision (never all eight), and set the cadence to how fast each evidence channel actually changes. **If [DECISION] is blank, stop — research without a decision is a hobby.** ## Template ```markdown # Collection Plan: [TARGET] / [CAPABILITY] ## Instantiation [TARGET] = [the competitor, partner, or acquirer] [MARKET] = [category + NAICS/SIC/NACE codes or nearest equivalent] [GEOGRAPHY] = [regions in scope, at COUNTRY level] [BUYER] = [who signs the check] [CAPABILITY] = [the strategic move you suspect] [DECISION] = [what this research will change — REQUIRED] ## Discipline Selection _Pick from the artifact-mapping table — run the disciplines that feed the decision, not all eight._ | Discipline | Running? | Why (which signal chains) | Key sources (free first) | |---|---|---|---| | OSINT | | | | | FININT | | | | | GEOINT/DEMOINT | | | | | TECHINT | | | | | HUMINT | | | | | SIGINT | | | | | MASINT | | | | ## Cadence - Weekly (SIGINT sweep, ~30 min): [what gets checked] - Monthly (OSINT + HUMINT digest): [what gets checked] - Quarterly (FININT + TECHINT deep pass): [what gets checked] - Event-driven (react within 48h): [which tripwires] ## Fusion Table (fill as signals land) | Discipline | Signal found | Label | Source URL + date | |---|---|---|---| | | | | | **Fusion verdict:** ____ disciplines, one story → [watch item / working hypothesis / actionable] → recommended response: ____ ## Provenance & Guardrails - Every signal archived at collection time (portals restructure; files get replaced) - All sources published, filed, posted, or publicly observable — the stage test applies to every method ``` ## Quality checks before you call it done - [DECISION] is filled in and specific — it selects the disciplines and defines "enough" - Two or three disciplines are marked Running, with chain-level reasons — eight checkmarks means no plan - The fusion verdict uses the stacking rule (1 = watch, 2 = hypothesis, 3+ = actionable, conflict = dig) - Announcements in the fusion table are labeled intent until FININT/MASINT/HUMINT corroborate