[ { "id": "fact-choice-000-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9400, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9400.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 0 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-000-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9400, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9400.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 0 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-001-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9401, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9401.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 1 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-001-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9401, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9401.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 1 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-002-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9402, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9402.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 2 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-002-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9402, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9402.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 2 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-003-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9403, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9403.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 3 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-003-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9403, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9403.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 3 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-004-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9404, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9404.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 4 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-004-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9404, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9404.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 4 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-005-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9405, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9405.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 5 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-005-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9405, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9405.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 5 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-006-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9406, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9406.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 6 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-006-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9406, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9406.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 6 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-007-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9407, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9407.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 7 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-007-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9407, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9407.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 7 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-008-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9408, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9408.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 8 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-008-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9408, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9408.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 8 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-009-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9409, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9409.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 9 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-009-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9409, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9409.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 9 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-010-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9410, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9410.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 10 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-010-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9410, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9410.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 10 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-011-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9411, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9411.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 11 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-011-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9411, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9411.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 11 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-012-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region is excluded for case F9412, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region is excluded for case F9412.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 12 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-012-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region is excluded for case F9412, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region is excluded for case F9412.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 12 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-013-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region is excluded for case F9413, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region is excluded for case F9413.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 13 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-013-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region is excluded for case F9413, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region is excluded for case F9413.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 13 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-014-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9414, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9414.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 14 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-014-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9414, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9414.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 14 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-015-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9415, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which deployment region applies to case F9415.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 15 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-015-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which deployment region applies to case F9415, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which deployment region applies to case F9415.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "deployment region", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 15 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-016-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9416, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9416.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 16 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-016-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9416, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9416.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 16 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-017-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9417, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9417.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 17 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-017-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9417, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9417.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 17 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-018-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9418, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9418.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 18 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-018-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9418, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9418.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 18 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-019-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9419, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9419.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 19 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-019-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9419, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9419.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 19 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-020-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9420, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9420.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 20 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-020-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9420, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9420.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 20 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-021-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9421, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9421.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 21 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-021-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9421, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9421.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 21 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-022-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9422, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9422.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 22 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-022-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9422, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9422.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 22 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-023-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9423, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9423.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 23 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-023-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9423, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9423.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 23 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-024-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9424, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9424.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 24 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-024-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9424, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9424.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 24 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-025-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9425, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9425.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 25 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-025-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9425, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9425.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 25 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-026-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9426, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9426.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 26 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-026-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9426, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9426.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 26 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-027-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9427, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9427.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 27 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-027-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9427, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9427.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 27 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-028-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination is excluded for case F9428, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination is excluded for case F9428.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 28 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-028-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination is excluded for case F9428, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination is excluded for case F9428.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 28 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-029-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination is excluded for case F9429, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination is excluded for case F9429.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 29 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-029-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination is excluded for case F9429, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination is excluded for case F9429.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 29 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-030-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9430, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9430.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 30 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-030-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9430, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9430.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 30 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-031-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9431, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which payment destination applies to case F9431.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 31 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-031-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which payment destination applies to case F9431, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which payment destination applies to case F9431.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "payment destination", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 31 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-032-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9432, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9432.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 32 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-032-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9432, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9432.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 32 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-033-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9433, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9433.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 33 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-033-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9433, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9433.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 33 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-034-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9434, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9434.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 34 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-034-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9434, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9434.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 34 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-035-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9435, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9435.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 35 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-035-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9435, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9435.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 35 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-036-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9436, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9436.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 36 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-036-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9436, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9436.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 36 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-037-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9437, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9437.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 37 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-037-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9437, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9437.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 37 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-038-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9438, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9438.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 38 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-038-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9438, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9438.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 38 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-039-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9439, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9439.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 39 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-039-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9439, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9439.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 39 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-040-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9440, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9440.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 40 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-040-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9440, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9440.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 40 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-041-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9441, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9441.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 41 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-041-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9441, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9441.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 41 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-042-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9442, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9442.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 42 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-042-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9442, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9442.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 42 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-043-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9443, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9443.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 43 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-043-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9443, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9443.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 43 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-044-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment is excluded for case F9444, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment is excluded for case F9444.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 44 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-044-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment is excluded for case F9444, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment is excluded for case F9444.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 44 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-045-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment is excluded for case F9445, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment is excluded for case F9445.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 45 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-045-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment is excluded for case F9445, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment is excluded for case F9445.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 45 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-046-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9446, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9446.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 46 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-046-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9446, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9446.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 46 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-047-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9447, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which shift assignment applies to case F9447.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 47 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-047-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which shift assignment applies to case F9447, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which shift assignment applies to case F9447.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "shift assignment", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 47 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-048-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9448, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9448.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 48 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-048-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9448, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9448.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 48 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-049-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9449, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9449.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 49 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-049-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9449, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9449.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 49 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-050-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9450, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9450.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 50 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-050-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9450, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9450.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 50 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-051-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9451, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9451.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 51 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-051-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9451, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9451.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 51 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-052-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9452, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9452.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 52 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-052-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9452, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9452.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 52 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-053-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9453, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9453.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 53 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-053-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9453, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9453.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 53 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-054-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9454, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9454.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 54 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-054-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9454, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9454.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 54 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-055-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9455, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9455.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 55 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-055-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9455, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9455.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 55 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-056-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9456, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9456.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 56 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-056-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9456, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9456.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 56 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-057-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9457, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9457.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 57 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-057-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9457, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9457.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 57 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-058-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9458, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9458.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 58 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-058-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9458, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9458.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 58 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-059-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9459, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9459.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 59 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-059-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9459, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9459.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 59 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-060-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option is excluded for case F9460, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option is excluded for case F9460.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 60 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-060-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option is excluded for case F9460, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option is excluded for case F9460.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 60 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-061-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option is excluded for case F9461, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option is excluded for case F9461.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 61 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-061-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option is excluded for case F9461, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option is excluded for case F9461.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 61 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-062-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9462, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9462.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 62 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-062-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9462, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9462.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 62 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-063-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9463, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which policy option applies to case F9463.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "policy option", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 63 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-063-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which policy option applies to case F9463, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which policy option applies to case F9463.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "policy option", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 63 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-064-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9464, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9464.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 64 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-064-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9464, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9464.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 64 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-065-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9465, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9465.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 65 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-065-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9465, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9465.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 65 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-066-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9466, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9466.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 66 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-066-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9466, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9466.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 66 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-067-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9467, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9467.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 67 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-067-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9467, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9467.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 67 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-068-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9468, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9468.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 68 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-068-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9468, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9468.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 68 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-069-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9469, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9469.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 69 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-069-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9469, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9469.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 69 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-070-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9470, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9470.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 70 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-070-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9470, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9470.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 70 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-071-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9471, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9471.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 71 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-071-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9471, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9471.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 71 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-072-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9472, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9472.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 72 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-072-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9472, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9472.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 72 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-073-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9473, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9473.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 73 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-073-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9473, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9473.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 73 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-074-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9474, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9474.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 74 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-074-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9474, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9474.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 74 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-075-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9475, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9475.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 75 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-075-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9475, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9475.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 75 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-076-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9476, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9476.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 76 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-076-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9476, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9476.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 76 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-077-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9477, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9477.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 77 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-077-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9477, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier is excluded for case F9477.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 77 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-078-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9478, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9478.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 78 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-078-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9478, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9478.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 78 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-079-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9479, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which procurement supplier applies to case F9479.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 79 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-079-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which procurement supplier applies to case F9479, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which procurement supplier applies to case F9479.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "procurement supplier", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 79 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-080-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9480, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9480.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 80 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-080-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9480, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9480.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 80 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-081-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9481, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9481.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 81 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-081-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9481, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9481.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 81 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-082-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9482, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9482.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 82 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-082-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9482, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9482.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 82 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-083-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9483, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9483.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 83 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-083-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9483, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9483.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 83 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-084-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9484, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9484.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 84 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-084-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9484, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9484.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 84 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-085-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9485, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9485.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 85 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-085-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9485, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9485.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 85 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-086-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9486, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9486.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 86 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-086-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9486, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9486.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 86 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-087-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9487, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9487.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 87 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-087-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9487, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9487.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 87 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-088-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9488, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9488.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 88 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-088-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9488, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9488.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 88 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-089-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9489, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9489.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 89 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-089-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9489, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9489.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 89 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-090-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9490, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9490.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 90 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-090-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9490, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9490.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 90 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-091-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9491, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9491.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 91 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-091-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9491, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9491.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 91 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-092-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9492, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9492.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 92 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-092-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9492, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9492.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 92 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-093-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9493, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9493.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 93 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-093-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9493, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation is excluded for case F9493.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 93 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-094-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9494, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9494.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 94 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-094-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9494, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9494.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 94 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-095-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9495, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which inventory allocation applies to case F9495.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 95 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-095-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which inventory allocation applies to case F9495, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which inventory allocation applies to case F9495.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "inventory allocation", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 95 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-096-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9496, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9496.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 96 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-096-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9496, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9496.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 96 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-097-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9497, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9497.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 97 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-097-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9497, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9497.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 97 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-098-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9498, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9498.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 98 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-098-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9498, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9498.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 98 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-099-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9499, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9499.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 99 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-099-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9499, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9499.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 99 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-100-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9500, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9500.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 100 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-100-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9500, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9500.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 100 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-101-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9501, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9501.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 101 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-101-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9501, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9501.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 101 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-102-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9502, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9502.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 102 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-102-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9502, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9502.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 102 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-103-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9503, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9503.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 103 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-103-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9503, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9503.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 103 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-104-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9504, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9504.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 104 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-104-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9504, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9504.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 104 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-105-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9505, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9505.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 105 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-105-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9505, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9505.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 105 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-106-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9506, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9506.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 106 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-106-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9506, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9506.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 106 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-107-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9507, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9507.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 107 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-107-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9507, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9507.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 107 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-108-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9508, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9508.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 108 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-108-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9508, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9508.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 108 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-109-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9509, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9509.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 109 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-109-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9509, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold is excluded for case F9509.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 109 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-110-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9510, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9510.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 110 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-110-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9510, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9510.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 110 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-111-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9511, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which analysis threshold applies to case F9511.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 111 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-111-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which analysis threshold applies to case F9511, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which analysis threshold applies to case F9511.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "analysis threshold", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 111 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-112-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9512, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9512.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 112 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-112-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9512, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9512.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 0, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 112 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-113-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9513, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9513.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 113 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-113-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9513, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Only the current operative answer matters here, not a prediction. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9513.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 0, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 113 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-114-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9514, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9514.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 114 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-114-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9514, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9514.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 1, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 114 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-115-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9515, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9515.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 115 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-115-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9515, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. One colleague has expressed a preference; a preference alone is not binding. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9515.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 1, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 115 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-116-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9516, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9516.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 116 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-116-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9516, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9516.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 2, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 116 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-117-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9517, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9517.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 117 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-117-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9517, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. A published finality rule distinguishes tentative progress from a governing outcome. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9517.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 2, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 117 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-118-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9518, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9518.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 118 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-118-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9518, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9518.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 3, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 118 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-119-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9519, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9519.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 119 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-119-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9519, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Implementation is a separate task; this issue concerns the operative answer, not whether it was applied. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9519.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 3, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 119 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-120-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9520, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9520.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 120 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-120-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9520, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9520.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 4, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 120 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-121-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9521, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9521.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 121 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-121-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9521, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Other participants may have information that the speaker does not have. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9521.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 4, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 121 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-122-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9522, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9522.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 122 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-122-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9522, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9522.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 5, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 122 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-123-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9523, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9523.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 123 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-123-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9523, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. Several earlier drafts exist. The issue concerns the current case, not a superseded draft. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9523.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 5, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 123 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-124-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date is excluded for case F9524, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date is excluded for case F9524.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 124 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-124-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date is excluded for case F9524, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date is excluded for case F9524.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 6, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 124 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-125-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date is excluded for case F9525, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date is excluded for case F9525.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 125 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-125-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date is excluded for case F9525, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. The issue is which option is excluded, rather than which option is favoured. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date is excluded for case F9525.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 6, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 125 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-126-0", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9526, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9526.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 126 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-126-1", "english": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9526, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The human coordinator is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9526.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 7, "authority": "human coordinator", "frame_cluster": 126 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-127-0", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9527, a governing answer already exists, but I lack the evidence to state it; finding or calculating the relevant information can settle the gap without a new selection.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nfact-not-known — which release date applies to case F9527.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out", "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: finding out", "settlement_stratum": "fact-not-known", "strata": { "form": "fact-not-known", "domain": "release date", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 127 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-127-1", "english": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nFor which release date applies to case F9527, no operative selection has been made; information may help, but the authorised chooser must select to settle the gap.", "ainglish": "The authorised software agent is the relevant chooser. This issue belongs to a named subtask; decisions about the parent task do not answer it. The speaker reports one unresolved issue.\nchoice-not-made — which release date applies to case F9527.", "question": "1. Is there already a governing answer to discover? 2. Which next step closes the reported gap? Choose the complete pair.", "options": [ "1: cannot tell; 2: neither step", "1: cannot tell; 2: finding out", "1: yes; 2: finding out", "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: yes; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "1: no; 2: finding out" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: an authorised chooser deciding", "settlement_stratum": "choice-not-made", "strata": { "form": "choice-not-made", "domain": "release date", "context": 7, "authority": "authorised software agent", "frame_cluster": 127 } }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-0", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-840 is with either Iven or Nola.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-840 is with Iven, not Nola.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-840?", "answer": "Iven", "options": [ "Iven", "Nola", "the information does not determine who", "neither person" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-1", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-841 is with either Sarin or Eda.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-841 is with Sarin, not Eda.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-841?", "answer": "Sarin", "options": [ "neither person", "Sarin", "Eda", "the information does not determine who" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-2", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-842 is with either Orla or Kavi.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-842 is with Orla, not Kavi.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-842?", "answer": "Orla", "options": [ "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Orla", "Kavi" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-3", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-843 is with either Tarin or Luma.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-843 is with Tarin, not Luma.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-843?", "answer": "Tarin", "options": [ "Luma", "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Tarin" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-4", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-844 is with either Yara or Oren.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-844 is with Yara, not Oren.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-844?", "answer": "Yara", "options": [ "Yara", "Oren", "the information does not determine who", "neither person" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-5", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-845 is with either Bela or Faris.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-845 is with Bela, not Faris.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-845?", "answer": "Bela", "options": [ "neither person", "Bela", "Faris", "the information does not determine who" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-6", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-846 is with either Enna or Rafi.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-846 is with Enna, not Rafi.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-846?", "answer": "Enna", "options": [ "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Enna", "Rafi" ] }, { "id": "fact-choice-control-7", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-847 is with either Miro or Zena.", "ainglish": "The sealed parcel TR-fact-choice-847 is with Miro, not Zena.", "question": "Who has parcel TR-fact-choice-847?", "answer": "Miro", "options": [ "Zena", "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Miro" ] } ]