[
  {
    "id": "since-0-00",
    "english": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, Because the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-00",
    "english": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, Ever since the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-00",
    "english": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-00",
    "english": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8100, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-01",
    "english": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-01",
    "english": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-01",
    "english": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-01",
    "english": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8101, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-02",
    "english": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, Because the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-02",
    "english": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, Ever since the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-02",
    "english": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-02",
    "english": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8102, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-03",
    "english": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-03",
    "english": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-03",
    "english": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-03",
    "english": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8103, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-04",
    "english": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, Because the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-04",
    "english": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, Ever since the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-04",
    "english": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-04",
    "english": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8104, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-05",
    "english": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-05",
    "english": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-05",
    "english": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-05",
    "english": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8105, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-06",
    "english": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, Because the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-06",
    "english": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, Ever since the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-06",
    "english": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-06",
    "english": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8106, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-07",
    "english": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-07",
    "english": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-07",
    "english": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-07",
    "english": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8107, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-08",
    "english": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, Because the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-08",
    "english": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, Ever since the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-08",
    "english": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-08",
    "english": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8108, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-09",
    "english": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-09",
    "english": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-09",
    "english": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-09",
    "english": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8109, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-10",
    "english": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, Because the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-10",
    "english": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, Ever since the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-10",
    "english": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-10",
    "english": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8110, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-11",
    "english": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-11",
    "english": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-11",
    "english": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-11",
    "english": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8111, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-12",
    "english": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, Because the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-12",
    "english": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, Ever since the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-12",
    "english": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-12",
    "english": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8112, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-13",
    "english": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-13",
    "english": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-13",
    "english": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-13",
    "english": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8113, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-14",
    "english": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, Because the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-14",
    "english": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, Ever since the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-14",
    "english": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-14",
    "english": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8114, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-15",
    "english": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-15",
    "english": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-15",
    "english": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-15",
    "english": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8115, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-16",
    "english": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, Because the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-16",
    "english": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, Ever since the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-16",
    "english": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-16",
    "english": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8116, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-17",
    "english": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-17",
    "english": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-17",
    "english": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-17",
    "english": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8117, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-18",
    "english": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, Because the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-18",
    "english": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, Ever since the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-18",
    "english": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-18",
    "english": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8118, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-19",
    "english": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-19",
    "english": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-19",
    "english": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-19",
    "english": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8119, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-20",
    "english": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, Because the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-20",
    "english": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, Ever since the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-20",
    "english": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-20",
    "english": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8120, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-21",
    "english": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-21",
    "english": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-21",
    "english": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-21",
    "english": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8121, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-22",
    "english": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, Because the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-22",
    "english": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, Ever since the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-22",
    "english": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-22",
    "english": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8122, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-23",
    "english": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-23",
    "english": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-23",
    "english": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-23",
    "english": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8123, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-24",
    "english": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, Because the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-24",
    "english": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, Ever since the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-24",
    "english": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-24",
    "english": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8124, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-25",
    "english": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-25",
    "english": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-25",
    "english": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-25",
    "english": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8125, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-26",
    "english": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, Because the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-26",
    "english": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, Ever since the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-26",
    "english": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-26",
    "english": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8126, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-27",
    "english": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-27",
    "english": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-27",
    "english": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-27",
    "english": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8127, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-28",
    "english": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, Because the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-28",
    "english": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, Ever since the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-28",
    "english": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-28",
    "english": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8128, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-29",
    "english": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-29",
    "english": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-29",
    "english": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-29",
    "english": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8129, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-30",
    "english": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, Because the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-30",
    "english": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, Ever since the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-30",
    "english": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-30",
    "english": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8130, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-31",
    "english": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-31",
    "english": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-31",
    "english": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-31",
    "english": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8131, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-32",
    "english": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, Because the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-32",
    "english": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, Ever since the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-32",
    "english": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-32",
    "english": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8132, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-33",
    "english": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-33",
    "english": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-33",
    "english": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-33",
    "english": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8133, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-34",
    "english": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, Because the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-34",
    "english": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, Ever since the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-34",
    "english": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-34",
    "english": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8134, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-35",
    "english": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-35",
    "english": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-35",
    "english": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-35",
    "english": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8135, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-36",
    "english": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, Because the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-36",
    "english": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, Ever since the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-36",
    "english": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-36",
    "english": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8136, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-37",
    "english": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-37",
    "english": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-37",
    "english": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-37",
    "english": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8137, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-38",
    "english": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, Because the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-38",
    "english": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, Ever since the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-38",
    "english": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-38",
    "english": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8138, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-39",
    "english": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-39",
    "english": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-39",
    "english": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-39",
    "english": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8139, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-40",
    "english": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, Because the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-40",
    "english": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, Ever since the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-40",
    "english": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-40",
    "english": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8140, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-41",
    "english": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-41",
    "english": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-41",
    "english": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-41",
    "english": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8141, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-42",
    "english": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, Because the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-42",
    "english": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, Ever since the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-42",
    "english": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-42",
    "english": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8142, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-43",
    "english": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-43",
    "english": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-43",
    "english": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-43",
    "english": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8143, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-44",
    "english": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, Because the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-44",
    "english": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, Ever since the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-44",
    "english": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-44",
    "english": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8144, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-45",
    "english": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-45",
    "english": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-45",
    "english": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-45",
    "english": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8145, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-46",
    "english": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, Because the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-46",
    "english": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, Ever since the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-46",
    "english": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-46",
    "english": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8146, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-47",
    "english": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-47",
    "english": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-47",
    "english": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-47",
    "english": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8147, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-48",
    "english": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, Because the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-48",
    "english": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, Ever since the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-48",
    "english": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-48",
    "english": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8148, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-49",
    "english": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-49",
    "english": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-49",
    "english": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-49",
    "english": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8149, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-50",
    "english": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, Because the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-50",
    "english": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, Ever since the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-50",
    "english": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-50",
    "english": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8150, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-51",
    "english": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-51",
    "english": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-51",
    "english": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-51",
    "english": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8151, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-52",
    "english": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, Because the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-52",
    "english": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, Ever since the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-52",
    "english": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-52",
    "english": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8152, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-53",
    "english": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-53",
    "english": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-53",
    "english": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-53",
    "english": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8153, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-54",
    "english": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, Because the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-54",
    "english": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, Ever since the relay reset, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-54",
    "english": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-54",
    "english": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8154, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-55",
    "english": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-55",
    "english": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-55",
    "english": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-55",
    "english": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8155, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-56",
    "english": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, Because the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-56",
    "english": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, Ever since the access rule changed, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-56",
    "english": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-56",
    "english": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8156, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-57",
    "english": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-57",
    "english": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-57",
    "english": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-57",
    "english": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8157, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-58",
    "english": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, Because the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-58",
    "english": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, Ever since the monitor was recalibrated, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-58",
    "english": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-58",
    "english": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8158, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-59",
    "english": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-59",
    "english": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-59",
    "english": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-59",
    "english": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8159, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-60",
    "english": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, Because the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-60",
    "english": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, Ever since the new rota began, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-60",
    "english": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-60",
    "english": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8160, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-61",
    "english": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-61",
    "english": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-61",
    "english": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-61",
    "english": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8161, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-62",
    "english": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, Because the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-62",
    "english": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, Ever since the meeting moved online, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-62",
    "english": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-62",
    "english": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8162, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-63",
    "english": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-63",
    "english": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet throughout the interval from that event (the relay reset) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-63",
    "english": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the relay reset explains why the alarms have stayed quiet; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the alarms have stayed quiet ever since the relay reset, and because the relay reset.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-63",
    "english": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8163, as of the stated review date, the relay reset. Separately, the alarms have stayed quiet.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "incident response",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "incident response:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-64",
    "english": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, Because the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-64",
    "english": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully throughout the interval from that event (the routing patch landed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, Ever since the routing patch landed, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-64",
    "english": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed explains why the service has answered successfully; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, the service has answered successfully ever since the routing patch landed, and because the routing patch landed.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-64",
    "english": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8164, as of the stated review date, the routing patch landed. Separately, the service has answered successfully.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "deployments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "deployments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-65",
    "english": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-65",
    "english": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked throughout the interval from that event (the access rule changed) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-65",
    "english": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed explains why the account has remained locked; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the account has remained locked ever since the access rule changed, and because the access rule changed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-65",
    "english": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8165, as of the stated review date, the access rule changed. Separately, the account has remained locked.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "access policy",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "access policy:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-66",
    "english": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, Because the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-66",
    "english": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening throughout the interval from that event (the bank link reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, Ever since the bank link reopened, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-66",
    "english": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened explains why payments have cleared every evening; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, payments have cleared every evening ever since the bank link reopened, and because the bank link reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-66",
    "english": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8166, as of the stated review date, the bank link reopened. Separately, payments have cleared every evening.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "payments",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "payments:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-67",
    "english": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-67",
    "english": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range throughout the interval from that event (the monitor was recalibrated) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-67",
    "english": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated explains why the readings have stayed within range; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the readings have stayed within range ever since the monitor was recalibrated, and because the monitor was recalibrated.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-67",
    "english": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8167, as of the stated review date, the monitor was recalibrated. Separately, the readings have stayed within range.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "health monitoring",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "health monitoring:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-68",
    "english": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, Because the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-68",
    "english": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning throughout the interval from that event (the depot reopened) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, Ever since the depot reopened, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-68",
    "english": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened explains why deliveries have arrived each morning; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, deliveries have arrived each morning ever since the depot reopened, and because the depot reopened.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-68",
    "english": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8168, as of the stated review date, the depot reopened. Separately, deliveries have arrived each morning.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "logistics",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "logistics:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-69",
    "english": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-69",
    "english": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed throughout the interval from that event (the new rota began) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-69",
    "english": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the new rota began explains why the desk has remained staffed; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the desk has remained staffed ever since the new rota began, and because the new rota began.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-69",
    "english": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8169, as of the stated review date, the new rota began. Separately, the desk has remained staffed.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "scheduling",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "scheduling:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-70",
    "english": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, Because the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-70",
    "english": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily throughout the interval from that event (the sensor was replaced) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, Ever since the sensor was replaced, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-70",
    "english": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced explains why the lab has logged observations daily; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, the lab has logged observations daily ever since the sensor was replaced, and because the sensor was replaced.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: yes. B = 1: yes; 2: no. C = 1: no; 2: yes. D = 1: no; 2: no.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "C": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: no; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-70",
    "english": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8170, as of the stated review date, the sensor was replaced. Separately, the lab has logged observations daily.",
    "question": "1. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? 2. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: yes. B = 1: no; 2: no. C = 1: yes; 2: yes. D = 1: yes; 2: no.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "research reporting",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": true,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "B": "1: no; 2: no",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: no"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "research reporting:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-0-71",
    "english": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "B",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "reason",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:reason"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-1-71",
    "english": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week throughout the interval from that event (the meeting moved online) through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "C",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "interval",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:interval"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-2-71",
    "english": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online explains why the team has met every week; this has held or recurred from that event through the review date.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the team has met every week ever since the meeting moved online, and because the meeting moved online.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: yes; 2: no. B = 1: no; 2: yes. C = 1: no; 2: no. D = 1: yes; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "D",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "both",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": true,
      "interval_asserted": true,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: yes; 2: yes",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "B": "1: no; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: no; 2: no",
        "D": "1: yes; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:both"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-3-71",
    "english": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "ainglish": "In case S8171, as of the stated review date, the meeting moved online. Separately, the team has met every week.",
    "question": "1. Does it itself assert a condition holding or recurring from that event through the review date? 2. Does this sentence itself say that the event explains why the main condition holds? Answer what is asserted, not what might also be true in the world. A = 1: no; 2: no. B = 1: yes; 2: yes. C = 1: yes; 2: no. D = 1: no; 2: yes.",
    "answer": "A",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "settlement_stratum": "neither",
    "ledger": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false
    },
    "strata": {
      "domain": "ordinary coordination",
      "reason_asserted": false,
      "interval_asserted": false,
      "reason_first": false,
      "semantic_gold": "1: no; 2: no",
      "answer_options": {
        "A": "1: no; 2: no",
        "B": "1: yes; 2: yes",
        "C": "1: yes; 2: no",
        "D": "1: no; 2: yes"
      },
      "frame_cluster": "ordinary coordination:neither"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-0",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-0-K, since-sep6-person-0-L, since-sep6-person-0-M holds parcel since-sep6-0. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-0-K, since-sep6-person-0-L, since-sep6-person-0-M holds parcel since-sep6-0. The record identifies since-sep6-person-0-K as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-0, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-0-K. B = not determined from the record. C = since-sep6-person-0-L. D = since-sep6-person-0-M.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "A",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "A",
      "other": "B"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-1",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-1-L, since-sep6-person-1-M, since-sep6-person-1-K holds parcel since-sep6-1. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-1-L, since-sep6-person-1-M, since-sep6-person-1-K holds parcel since-sep6-1. The record identifies since-sep6-person-1-L as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-1, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-1-L. B = since-sep6-person-1-K. C = not determined from the record. D = since-sep6-person-1-M.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "A",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "A",
      "other": "C"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-2",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-2-M, since-sep6-person-2-K, since-sep6-person-2-L holds parcel since-sep6-2. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-2-M, since-sep6-person-2-K, since-sep6-person-2-L holds parcel since-sep6-2. The record identifies since-sep6-person-2-M as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-2, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-2-M. B = since-sep6-person-2-K. C = since-sep6-person-2-L. D = not determined from the record.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "A",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "A",
      "other": "D"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-3",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-3-K, since-sep6-person-3-L, since-sep6-person-3-M holds parcel since-sep6-3. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-3-K, since-sep6-person-3-L, since-sep6-person-3-M holds parcel since-sep6-3. The record identifies since-sep6-person-3-K as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-3, according to this record? A = not determined from the record. B = since-sep6-person-3-K. C = since-sep6-person-3-L. D = since-sep6-person-3-M.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "B",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "B",
      "other": "A"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-4",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-4-L, since-sep6-person-4-M, since-sep6-person-4-K holds parcel since-sep6-4. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-4-L, since-sep6-person-4-M, since-sep6-person-4-K holds parcel since-sep6-4. The record identifies since-sep6-person-4-M as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-4, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-4-K. B = since-sep6-person-4-M. C = not determined from the record. D = since-sep6-person-4-L.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "B",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "B",
      "other": "C"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-5",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-5-M, since-sep6-person-5-K, since-sep6-person-5-L holds parcel since-sep6-5. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-5-M, since-sep6-person-5-K, since-sep6-person-5-L holds parcel since-sep6-5. The record identifies since-sep6-person-5-K as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-5, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-5-L. B = since-sep6-person-5-K. C = since-sep6-person-5-M. D = not determined from the record.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "B",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "B",
      "other": "D"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-6",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-6-K, since-sep6-person-6-L, since-sep6-person-6-M holds parcel since-sep6-6. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-6-K, since-sep6-person-6-L, since-sep6-person-6-M holds parcel since-sep6-6. The record identifies since-sep6-person-6-L as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-6, according to this record? A = not determined from the record. B = since-sep6-person-6-K. C = since-sep6-person-6-L. D = since-sep6-person-6-M.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "C",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "C",
      "other": "A"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-7",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-7-L, since-sep6-person-7-M, since-sep6-person-7-K holds parcel since-sep6-7. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-7-L, since-sep6-person-7-M, since-sep6-person-7-K holds parcel since-sep6-7. The record identifies since-sep6-person-7-M as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-7, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-7-K. B = not determined from the record. C = since-sep6-person-7-M. D = since-sep6-person-7-L.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "C",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "C",
      "other": "B"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-8",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-8-M, since-sep6-person-8-K, since-sep6-person-8-L holds parcel since-sep6-8. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-8-M, since-sep6-person-8-K, since-sep6-person-8-L holds parcel since-sep6-8. The record identifies since-sep6-person-8-L as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-8, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-8-K. B = since-sep6-person-8-M. C = since-sep6-person-8-L. D = not determined from the record.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "C",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "C",
      "other": "D"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-9",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-9-K, since-sep6-person-9-L, since-sep6-person-9-M holds parcel since-sep6-9. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-9-K, since-sep6-person-9-L, since-sep6-person-9-M holds parcel since-sep6-9. The record identifies since-sep6-person-9-M as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-9, according to this record? A = not determined from the record. B = since-sep6-person-9-K. C = since-sep6-person-9-L. D = since-sep6-person-9-M.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "D",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "D",
      "other": "A"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-10",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-10-L, since-sep6-person-10-M, since-sep6-person-10-K holds parcel since-sep6-10. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-10-L, since-sep6-person-10-M, since-sep6-person-10-K holds parcel since-sep6-10. The record identifies since-sep6-person-10-K as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-10, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-10-L. B = not determined from the record. C = since-sep6-person-10-M. D = since-sep6-person-10-K.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "D",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "D",
      "other": "B"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "since-sep6-11",
    "english": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-11-M, since-sep6-person-11-K, since-sep6-person-11-L holds parcel since-sep6-11. The record does not identify its holder.",
    "ainglish": "Exactly one of since-sep6-person-11-M, since-sep6-person-11-K, since-sep6-person-11-L holds parcel since-sep6-11. The record identifies since-sep6-person-11-L as its holder.",
    "question": "Who holds parcel since-sep6-11, according to this record? A = since-sep6-person-11-K. B = since-sep6-person-11-M. C = not determined from the record. D = since-sep6-person-11-L.",
    "options": [
      "A",
      "B",
      "C",
      "D"
    ],
    "answer": "D",
    "calibration": true,
    "calibration_truth": {
      "detectable": "D",
      "other": "C"
    }
  }
]