{ "kind": "dexagon.ainglish.dispute-settlement-carrier.v1", "proposal_public_id": "a-4fsc7etzs8ctsjwp", "proposal_revision": "each-group-group-set-ref-clause-groups-combined-group-set", "construct": "each-group / groups-combined", "replicates_hash": "92d85061748d813965520e6be3f6e57e1c8549fe65d98f2407f86c94b565e293", "comparator": { "kind": "complete-careful-english-v1" }, "items": [ { "id": "group-each-01-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-41-3, the conversion rate exceeds 55% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-41-3): conversion rate>55% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-41-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 55%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-41-3): conversion rate>55% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-41-4, the recovery rate exceeds 58% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-41-4): recovery rate>58% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-41-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 58%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-41-4): recovery rate>58% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-41-5, the accuracy exceeds 61% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-41-5): accuracy>61% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-41-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 61%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-41-5): accuracy>61% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-41-6, the failure rate exceeds 64% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-41-6): failure rate>64% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-41-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 64%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-41-6): failure rate>64% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-41-7, the attendance rate exceeds 67% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-41-7): attendance rate>67% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-41-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 67%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-41-7): attendance rate>67% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-41-8, the damage rate exceeds 70% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-41-8): damage rate>70% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 70% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-41-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 70%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-41-8): damage rate>70% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 70% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-41-9, the completion rate exceeds 73% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-41-9): completion rate>73% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 73% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-41-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 73%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-41-9): completion rate>73% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 73% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-41-10, the latency exceeds 76% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-41-10): latency>76% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 76% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-41-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 76%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-41-10): latency>76% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 76% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-41-11, the employment rate exceeds 79% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-41-11): employment rate>79% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 79% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-41-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 79%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-41-11): employment rate>79% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 79% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-41-12, the agreement rate exceeds 82% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-41-12): agreement rate>82% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 82% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-41-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 82%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-41-12): agreement rate>82% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 82% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-41-13, the defect rate exceeds 85% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-41-13): defect rate>85% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 85% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-41-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 85%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-41-13): defect rate>85% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 85% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-01-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-41-14, the delivery rate exceeds 88% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-41-14): delivery rate>88% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 88% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-01-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-41-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 88%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-41-14): delivery rate>88% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 88% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-42-3, the conversion rate exceeds 62% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-42-3): conversion rate>62% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 62% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-42-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 62%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-42-3): conversion rate>62% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 62% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-42-4, the recovery rate exceeds 65% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-42-4): recovery rate>65% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 65% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-42-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 65%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-42-4): recovery rate>65% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 65% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-42-5, the accuracy exceeds 68% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-42-5): accuracy>68% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 68% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-42-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 68%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-42-5): accuracy>68% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 68% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-42-6, the failure rate exceeds 71% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-42-6): failure rate>71% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 71% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-42-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 71%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-42-6): failure rate>71% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 71% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-42-7, the attendance rate exceeds 74% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-42-7): attendance rate>74% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 74% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-42-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 74%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-42-7): attendance rate>74% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 74% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-42-8, the damage rate exceeds 77% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-42-8): damage rate>77% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 77% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-42-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 77%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-42-8): damage rate>77% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 77% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-42-9, the completion rate exceeds 80% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-42-9): completion rate>80% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 80% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-42-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 80%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-42-9): completion rate>80% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 80% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-42-10, the latency exceeds 83% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-42-10): latency>83% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 83% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-42-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 83%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-42-10): latency>83% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 83% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-42-11, the employment rate exceeds 86% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-42-11): employment rate>86% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 86% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-42-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 86%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-42-11): employment rate>86% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 86% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-42-12, the agreement rate exceeds 89% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-42-12): agreement rate>89% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 89% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-42-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 89%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-42-12): agreement rate>89% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 89% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-42-13, the defect rate exceeds 57% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-42-13): defect rate>57% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 57% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-42-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 57%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-42-13): defect rate>57% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 57% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-02-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-42-14, the delivery rate exceeds 60% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-42-14): delivery rate>60% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 60% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-02-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-42-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 60%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-42-14): delivery rate>60% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 60% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-43-3, the conversion rate exceeds 69% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-43-3): conversion rate>69% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 69% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-43-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 69%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-43-3): conversion rate>69% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 69% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-43-4, the recovery rate exceeds 72% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-43-4): recovery rate>72% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 72% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-43-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 72%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-43-4): recovery rate>72% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 72% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-43-5, the accuracy exceeds 75% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-43-5): accuracy>75% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 75% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-43-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 75%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-43-5): accuracy>75% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 75% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-43-6, the failure rate exceeds 78% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-43-6): failure rate>78% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 78% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-43-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 78%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-43-6): failure rate>78% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 78% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-43-7, the attendance rate exceeds 81% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-43-7): attendance rate>81% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 81% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-43-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 81%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-43-7): attendance rate>81% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 81% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-43-8, the damage rate exceeds 84% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-43-8): damage rate>84% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 84% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-43-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 84%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-43-8): damage rate>84% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 84% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-43-9, the completion rate exceeds 87% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-43-9): completion rate>87% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 87% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-43-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 87%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-43-9): completion rate>87% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 87% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-43-10, the latency exceeds 55% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-43-10): latency>55% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-43-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 55%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-43-10): latency>55% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-43-11, the employment rate exceeds 58% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-43-11): employment rate>58% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-43-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 58%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-43-11): employment rate>58% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-43-12, the agreement rate exceeds 61% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-43-12): agreement rate>61% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-43-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 61%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-43-12): agreement rate>61% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-43-13, the defect rate exceeds 64% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-43-13): defect rate>64% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-43-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 64%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-43-13): defect rate>64% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-03-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-43-14, the delivery rate exceeds 67% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-43-14): delivery rate>67% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-03-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-43-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 67%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-43-14): delivery rate>67% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-44-3, the conversion rate exceeds 76% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-44-3): conversion rate>76% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 76% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-44-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 76%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-44-3): conversion rate>76% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 76% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-44-4, the recovery rate exceeds 79% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-44-4): recovery rate>79% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 79% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-44-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 79%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-44-4): recovery rate>79% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 79% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-44-5, the accuracy exceeds 82% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-44-5): accuracy>82% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 82% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-44-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 82%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-44-5): accuracy>82% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 82% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-44-6, the failure rate exceeds 85% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-44-6): failure rate>85% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 85% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-44-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 85%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-44-6): failure rate>85% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 85% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-44-7, the attendance rate exceeds 88% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-44-7): attendance rate>88% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 88% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-44-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 88%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-44-7): attendance rate>88% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 88% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-44-8, the damage rate exceeds 56% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-44-8): damage rate>56% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 56% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-44-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 56%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-44-8): damage rate>56% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 56% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-44-9, the completion rate exceeds 59% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-44-9): completion rate>59% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 59% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-44-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 59%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-44-9): completion rate>59% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 59% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-44-10, the latency exceeds 62% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-44-10): latency>62% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 62% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-44-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 62%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-44-10): latency>62% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 62% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-44-11, the employment rate exceeds 65% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-44-11): employment rate>65% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 65% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-44-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 65%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-44-11): employment rate>65% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 65% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-44-12, the agreement rate exceeds 68% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-44-12): agreement rate>68% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 68% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-44-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 68%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-44-12): agreement rate>68% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 68% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-44-13, the defect rate exceeds 71% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-44-13): defect rate>71% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 71% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-44-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 71%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-44-13): defect rate>71% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 71% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-04-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-44-14, the delivery rate exceeds 74% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-44-14): delivery rate>74% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 74% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-04-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-44-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 74%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-44-14): delivery rate>74% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 74% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-45-3, the conversion rate exceeds 83% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-45-3): conversion rate>83% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 83% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-45-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 83%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-45-3): conversion rate>83% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 83% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-45-4, the recovery rate exceeds 86% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-45-4): recovery rate>86% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 86% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-45-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 86%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-45-4): recovery rate>86% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 86% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-45-5, the accuracy exceeds 89% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-45-5): accuracy>89% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 89% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-45-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 89%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-45-5): accuracy>89% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 89% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-45-6, the failure rate exceeds 57% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-45-6): failure rate>57% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 57% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-45-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 57%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-45-6): failure rate>57% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 57% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-45-7, the attendance rate exceeds 60% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-45-7): attendance rate>60% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 60% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-45-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 60%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-45-7): attendance rate>60% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 60% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-45-8, the damage rate exceeds 63% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-45-8): damage rate>63% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 63% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-45-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 63%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-45-8): damage rate>63% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 63% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-45-9, the completion rate exceeds 66% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-45-9): completion rate>66% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 66% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-45-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 66%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-45-9): completion rate>66% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 66% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-45-10, the latency exceeds 69% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-45-10): latency>69% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 69% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-45-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 69%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-45-10): latency>69% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 69% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-45-11, the employment rate exceeds 72% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-45-11): employment rate>72% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 72% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-45-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 72%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-45-11): employment rate>72% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 72% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-45-12, the agreement rate exceeds 75% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-45-12): agreement rate>75% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 75% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-45-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 75%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-45-12): agreement rate>75% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 75% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-45-13, the defect rate exceeds 78% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-45-13): defect rate>78% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 78% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-45-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 78%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-45-13): defect rate>78% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 78% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-05-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-45-14, the delivery rate exceeds 81% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-45-14): delivery rate>81% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 81% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-05-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-45-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 81%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-45-14): delivery rate>81% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 81% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-46-3, the conversion rate exceeds 55% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-46-3): conversion rate>55% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-46-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 55%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-46-3): conversion rate>55% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-46-4, the recovery rate exceeds 58% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-46-4): recovery rate>58% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-46-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 58%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-46-4): recovery rate>58% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-46-5, the accuracy exceeds 61% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-46-5): accuracy>61% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-46-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 61%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-46-5): accuracy>61% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-46-6, the failure rate exceeds 64% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-46-6): failure rate>64% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-46-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 64%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-46-6): failure rate>64% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-46-7, the attendance rate exceeds 67% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-46-7): attendance rate>67% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-46-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 67%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-46-7): attendance rate>67% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-46-8, the damage rate exceeds 70% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-46-8): damage rate>70% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 70% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-46-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 70%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-46-8): damage rate>70% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 70% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-46-9, the completion rate exceeds 73% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-46-9): completion rate>73% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 73% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-46-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 73%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-46-9): completion rate>73% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 73% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-46-10, the latency exceeds 76% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-46-10): latency>76% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 76% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-46-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 76%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-46-10): latency>76% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 76% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-46-11, the employment rate exceeds 79% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-46-11): employment rate>79% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 79% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-46-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 79%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-46-11): employment rate>79% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 79% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-46-12, the agreement rate exceeds 82% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-46-12): agreement rate>82% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 82% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-46-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 82%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-46-12): agreement rate>82% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 82% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-46-13, the defect rate exceeds 85% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-46-13): defect rate>85% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 85% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-46-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 85%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-46-13): defect rate>85% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 85% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-06-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-46-14, the delivery rate exceeds 88% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-46-14): delivery rate>88% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 88% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-06-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-46-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 88%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-46-14): delivery rate>88% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 88% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-47-3, the conversion rate exceeds 62% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-47-3): conversion rate>62% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 62% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-47-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 62%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-47-3): conversion rate>62% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 62% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-47-4, the recovery rate exceeds 65% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-47-4): recovery rate>65% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 65% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-47-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 65%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-47-4): recovery rate>65% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 65% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-47-5, the accuracy exceeds 68% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-47-5): accuracy>68% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 68% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-47-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 68%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-47-5): accuracy>68% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 68% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-47-6, the failure rate exceeds 71% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-47-6): failure rate>71% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 71% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-47-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 71%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-47-6): failure rate>71% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 71% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-47-7, the attendance rate exceeds 74% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-47-7): attendance rate>74% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 74% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-47-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 74%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-47-7): attendance rate>74% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 74% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-47-8, the damage rate exceeds 77% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-47-8): damage rate>77% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 77% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-47-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 77%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-47-8): damage rate>77% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 77% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-47-9, the completion rate exceeds 80% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-47-9): completion rate>80% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 80% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-47-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 80%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-47-9): completion rate>80% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 80% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-47-10, the latency exceeds 83% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-47-10): latency>83% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 83% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-47-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 83%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-47-10): latency>83% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 83% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-47-11, the employment rate exceeds 86% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-47-11): employment rate>86% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 86% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-47-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 86%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-47-11): employment rate>86% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 86% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-47-12, the agreement rate exceeds 89% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-47-12): agreement rate>89% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 89% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-47-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 89%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-47-12): agreement rate>89% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 89% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-47-13, the defect rate exceeds 57% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-47-13): defect rate>57% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 57% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-47-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 57%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-47-13): defect rate>57% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 57% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-07-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-47-14, the delivery rate exceeds 60% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-47-14): delivery rate>60% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 60% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-07-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-47-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 60%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-47-14): delivery rate>60% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 60% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-48-3, the conversion rate exceeds 69% in every named region, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(regions-set-48-3): conversion rate>69% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 69% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-01", "english": "Using membership revision regions-set-48-3, after the observations from all named regions are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled conversion rate exceeds 69%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(regions-set-48-3): conversion rate>69% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named region be at or below 69% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-48-4, the recovery rate exceeds 72% in every named clinic, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(clinics-set-48-4): recovery rate>72% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 72% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-02", "english": "Using membership revision clinics-set-48-4, after the observations from all named clinics are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled recovery rate exceeds 72%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(clinics-set-48-4): recovery rate>72% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named clinic be at or below 72% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-48-5, the accuracy exceeds 75% in every named model, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(models-set-48-5): accuracy>75% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 75% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-03", "english": "Using membership revision models-set-48-5, after the observations from all named models are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled accuracy exceeds 75%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(models-set-48-5): accuracy>75% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named model be at or below 75% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-48-6, the failure rate exceeds 78% in every named queue, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(queues-set-48-6): failure rate>78% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 78% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-04", "english": "Using membership revision queues-set-48-6, after the observations from all named queues are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled failure rate exceeds 78%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(queues-set-48-6): failure rate>78% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named queue be at or below 78% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-48-7, the attendance rate exceeds 81% in every named school, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(schools-set-48-7): attendance rate>81% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 81% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-05", "english": "Using membership revision schools-set-48-7, after the observations from all named schools are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled attendance rate exceeds 81%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(schools-set-48-7): attendance rate>81% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named school be at or below 81% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-48-8, the damage rate exceeds 84% in every named warehouse, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(warehouses-set-48-8): damage rate>84% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 84% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-06", "english": "Using membership revision warehouses-set-48-8, after the observations from all named warehouses are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled damage rate exceeds 84%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(warehouses-set-48-8): damage rate>84% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named warehouse be at or below 84% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-48-9, the completion rate exceeds 87% in every named team, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(teams-set-48-9): completion rate>87% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 87% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-07", "english": "Using membership revision teams-set-48-9, after the observations from all named teams are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled completion rate exceeds 87%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(teams-set-48-9): completion rate>87% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named team be at or below 87% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-48-10, the latency exceeds 55% in every named device, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(devices-set-48-10): latency>55% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-08", "english": "Using membership revision devices-set-48-10, after the observations from all named devices are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled latency exceeds 55%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(devices-set-48-10): latency>55% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named device be at or below 55% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-48-11, the employment rate exceeds 58% in every named district, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(districts-set-48-11): employment rate>58% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-09", "english": "Using membership revision districts-set-48-11, after the observations from all named districts are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled employment rate exceeds 58%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(districts-set-48-11): employment rate>58% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named district be at or below 58% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-48-12, the agreement rate exceeds 61% in every named auditor, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(auditors-set-48-12): agreement rate>61% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-10", "english": "Using membership revision auditors-set-48-12, after the observations from all named auditors are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled agreement rate exceeds 61%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(auditors-set-48-12): agreement rate>61% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named auditor be at or below 61% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-48-13, the defect rate exceeds 64% in every named batche, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(batches-set-48-13): defect rate>64% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold", "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-11", "english": "Using membership revision batches-set-48-13, after the observations from all named batches are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled defect rate exceeds 64%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(batches-set-48-13): defect rate>64% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named batche be at or below 64% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-each-08-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-48-14, the delivery rate exceeds 67% in every named route, with each one assessed separately under the same rule and window.", "ainglish": "each-group(routes-set-48-14): delivery rate>67% under the declared rule and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "Yes; the message requires equal effect sizes but not threshold passage", "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "Yes; only the pooled observations must exceed the threshold" ], "answer": "No; the statement requires the threshold to hold separately in every named group", "form": "each-group", "probe": "member-level entailment" }, { "id": "group-combined-08-12", "english": "Using membership revision routes-set-48-14, after the observations from all named routes are combined under the declared weighting and denominator, the pooled delivery rate exceeds 67%; no member-level result is asserted.", "ainglish": "groups-combined(routes-set-48-14): delivery rate>67% under the declared weighting, denominator, and window.", "question": "Could one named route be at or below 67% without contradicting this message?", "options": [ "The message does not identify which group set is in scope", "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "No; every named group must separately exceed the threshold", "No; the message asserts equal effect sizes in every group" ], "answer": "Yes; the combined result can exceed the threshold even when one named group does not", "form": "groups-combined", "probe": "aggregate-only entailment" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-01", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the acorn ticket, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the acorn ticket is stored in bay 17.", "question": "Where does the message say the acorn ticket is stored?", "options": [ "bay 17", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "bay 17", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-02", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the bronze tag, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the bronze tag is stored in shelf 24.", "question": "Where does the message say the bronze tag is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "shelf 24" ], "answer": "shelf 24", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-03", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the cerulean folder, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the cerulean folder is stored in rack 31.", "question": "Where does the message say the cerulean folder is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "rack 31", "the intake room" ], "answer": "rack 31", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-04", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the driftwood key, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the driftwood key is stored in bay 42.", "question": "Where does the message say the driftwood key is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "bay 42", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "bay 42", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-05", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the egret card, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the egret card is stored in shelf 53.", "question": "Where does the message say the egret card is stored?", "options": [ "shelf 53", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "shelf 53", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-06", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the fallow token, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the fallow token is stored in rack 64.", "question": "Where does the message say the fallow token is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "rack 64" ], "answer": "rack 64", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-07", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the ginger seal, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the ginger seal is stored in bay 75.", "question": "Where does the message say the ginger seal is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "bay 75", "the intake room" ], "answer": "bay 75", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-08", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the heather note, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the heather note is stored in shelf 86.", "question": "Where does the message say the heather note is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "shelf 86", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "shelf 86", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-09", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the ivory disk, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the ivory disk is stored in rack 97.", "question": "Where does the message say the ivory disk is stored?", "options": [ "rack 97", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "rack 97", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-10", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the juniper pass, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the juniper pass is stored in bay 108.", "question": "Where does the message say the juniper pass is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "bay 108" ], "answer": "bay 108", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-11", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the khaki badge, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the khaki badge is stored in shelf 119.", "question": "Where does the message say the khaki badge is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "shelf 119", "the intake room" ], "answer": "shelf 119", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-12", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the lilac slip, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the lilac slip is stored in rack 120.", "question": "Where does the message say the lilac slip is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "rack 120", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "rack 120", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-13", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the marble token, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the marble token is stored in bay 131.", "question": "Where does the message say the marble token is stored?", "options": [ "bay 131", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "bay 131", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-14", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the navy seal, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the navy seal is stored in shelf 142.", "question": "Where does the message say the navy seal is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "shelf 142" ], "answer": "shelf 142", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-15", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the opal card, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the opal card is stored in rack 153.", "question": "Where does the message say the opal card is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "rack 153", "the intake room" ], "answer": "rack 153", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "group-scope-cal-16", "calibration": true, "english": "The register mentions the poppy key, but gives no storage location.", "ainglish": "The register says the poppy key is stored in bay 164.", "question": "Where does the message say the poppy key is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "bay 164", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "bay 164", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" } ], "reader_calls": 0 }