{ "kind": "dexagon.ainglish.verdict-fail-comprehension-carrier.v1", "proposal_public_id": "a-6974j2deetg3rcb5", "proposal_revision": "verdict-fail-no-verdict", "construct": "verdict-fail / no-verdict", "replicates_hash": "f68f899dd4a737c36733f3d9aaac2a9558f6727ed0c920280ad23974c7d721ed", "comparator": { "kind": "complete-careful-english-v1" }, "items": [ { "id": "verdict-fail-01-01", "english": "For case-41-11, the deployment smoke suite ran to completion and found the release candidate defective: three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-41-11: verdict-fail — three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the release candidate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The release candidate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-01", "english": "For case-41-11, the deployment smoke suite did not reach a result because runner timed out before assertions; the release candidate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-41-11: no-verdict — runner timed out before assertions; release candidate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-02", "english": "For case-41-12, the archive integrity scan ran to completion and found the archive defective: two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-41-12: verdict-fail — two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the archive.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The archive passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The archive is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the archive" ], "answer": "The archive is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-02", "english": "For case-41-12, the archive integrity scan did not reach a result because object store was unreachable; the archive's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-41-12: no-verdict — object store was unreachable; archive condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "The archive is reported as defective", "The archive passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-03", "english": "For case-41-13, the schema conformance gate ran to completion and found the dataset defective: four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-41-13: verdict-fail — four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the dataset.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The dataset is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-03", "english": "For case-41-13, the schema conformance gate did not reach a result because schema fixture could not be loaded; the dataset's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-41-13: no-verdict — schema fixture could not be loaded; dataset condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-04", "english": "For case-41-14, the certificate verifier ran to completion and found the certificate defective: the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-41-14: verdict-fail — the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the certificate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The certificate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate" ], "answer": "The certificate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-04", "english": "For case-41-14, the certificate verifier did not reach a result because revocation service rate-limited the verifier; the certificate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-41-14: no-verdict — revocation service rate-limited the verifier; certificate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The certificate passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-05", "english": "For case-41-15, the replica health probe ran to completion and found the replica defective: the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-41-15: verdict-fail — the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the replica.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The replica is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-05", "english": "For case-41-15, the replica health probe did not reach a result because the probe process crashed before connecting; the replica's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-41-15: no-verdict — the probe process crashed before connecting; replica condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the replica" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-06", "english": "For case-41-16, the policy compliance check ran to completion and found the policy bundle defective: a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-41-16: verdict-fail — a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the policy bundle.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The policy bundle passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle" ], "answer": "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-06", "english": "For case-41-16, the policy compliance check did not reach a result because the evaluator lacked the policy input; the policy bundle's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-41-16: no-verdict — the evaluator lacked the policy input; policy bundle condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The policy bundle passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-07", "english": "For case-41-17, the model safety evaluation ran to completion and found the model build defective: the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-41-17: verdict-fail — the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the model build.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The model build is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-07", "english": "For case-41-17, the model safety evaluation did not reach a result because the evaluation host lost power mid-run; the model build's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-41-17: no-verdict — the evaluation host lost power mid-run; model build condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the model build" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-01-08", "english": "For case-41-18, the migration validation job ran to completion and found the migration defective: the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-41-18: verdict-fail — the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the migration.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The migration passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The migration is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the migration" ], "answer": "The migration is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-01-08", "english": "For case-41-18, the migration validation job did not reach a result because the validation database never started; the migration's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-41-18: no-verdict — the validation database never started; migration condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "The migration is reported as defective", "The migration passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-01", "english": "For case-42-11, the deployment smoke suite ran to completion and found the release candidate defective: three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-42-11: verdict-fail — three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the release candidate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The release candidate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-01", "english": "For case-42-11, the deployment smoke suite did not reach a result because runner timed out before assertions; the release candidate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-42-11: no-verdict — runner timed out before assertions; release candidate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-02", "english": "For case-42-12, the archive integrity scan ran to completion and found the archive defective: two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-42-12: verdict-fail — two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the archive.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The archive passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The archive is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the archive" ], "answer": "The archive is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-02", "english": "For case-42-12, the archive integrity scan did not reach a result because object store was unreachable; the archive's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-42-12: no-verdict — object store was unreachable; archive condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "The archive is reported as defective", "The archive passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-03", "english": "For case-42-13, the schema conformance gate ran to completion and found the dataset defective: four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-42-13: verdict-fail — four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the dataset.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The dataset is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-03", "english": "For case-42-13, the schema conformance gate did not reach a result because schema fixture could not be loaded; the dataset's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-42-13: no-verdict — schema fixture could not be loaded; dataset condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-04", "english": "For case-42-14, the certificate verifier ran to completion and found the certificate defective: the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-42-14: verdict-fail — the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the certificate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The certificate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate" ], "answer": "The certificate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-04", "english": "For case-42-14, the certificate verifier did not reach a result because revocation service rate-limited the verifier; the certificate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-42-14: no-verdict — revocation service rate-limited the verifier; certificate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The certificate passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-05", "english": "For case-42-15, the replica health probe ran to completion and found the replica defective: the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-42-15: verdict-fail — the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the replica.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The replica is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-05", "english": "For case-42-15, the replica health probe did not reach a result because the probe process crashed before connecting; the replica's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-42-15: no-verdict — the probe process crashed before connecting; replica condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the replica" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-06", "english": "For case-42-16, the policy compliance check ran to completion and found the policy bundle defective: a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-42-16: verdict-fail — a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the policy bundle.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The policy bundle passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle" ], "answer": "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-06", "english": "For case-42-16, the policy compliance check did not reach a result because the evaluator lacked the policy input; the policy bundle's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-42-16: no-verdict — the evaluator lacked the policy input; policy bundle condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The policy bundle passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-07", "english": "For case-42-17, the model safety evaluation ran to completion and found the model build defective: the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-42-17: verdict-fail — the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the model build.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The model build is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-07", "english": "For case-42-17, the model safety evaluation did not reach a result because the evaluation host lost power mid-run; the model build's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-42-17: no-verdict — the evaluation host lost power mid-run; model build condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the model build" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-02-08", "english": "For case-42-18, the migration validation job ran to completion and found the migration defective: the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-42-18: verdict-fail — the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the migration.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The migration passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The migration is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the migration" ], "answer": "The migration is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-02-08", "english": "For case-42-18, the migration validation job did not reach a result because the validation database never started; the migration's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-42-18: no-verdict — the validation database never started; migration condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "The migration is reported as defective", "The migration passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-01", "english": "For case-43-11, the deployment smoke suite ran to completion and found the release candidate defective: three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-43-11: verdict-fail — three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the release candidate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The release candidate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-01", "english": "For case-43-11, the deployment smoke suite did not reach a result because runner timed out before assertions; the release candidate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-43-11: no-verdict — runner timed out before assertions; release candidate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-02", "english": "For case-43-12, the archive integrity scan ran to completion and found the archive defective: two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-43-12: verdict-fail — two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the archive.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The archive passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The archive is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the archive" ], "answer": "The archive is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-02", "english": "For case-43-12, the archive integrity scan did not reach a result because object store was unreachable; the archive's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-43-12: no-verdict — object store was unreachable; archive condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "The archive is reported as defective", "The archive passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-03", "english": "For case-43-13, the schema conformance gate ran to completion and found the dataset defective: four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-43-13: verdict-fail — four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the dataset.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The dataset is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-03", "english": "For case-43-13, the schema conformance gate did not reach a result because schema fixture could not be loaded; the dataset's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-43-13: no-verdict — schema fixture could not be loaded; dataset condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-04", "english": "For case-43-14, the certificate verifier ran to completion and found the certificate defective: the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-43-14: verdict-fail — the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the certificate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The certificate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate" ], "answer": "The certificate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-04", "english": "For case-43-14, the certificate verifier did not reach a result because revocation service rate-limited the verifier; the certificate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-43-14: no-verdict — revocation service rate-limited the verifier; certificate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The certificate passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-05", "english": "For case-43-15, the replica health probe ran to completion and found the replica defective: the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-43-15: verdict-fail — the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the replica.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The replica is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-05", "english": "For case-43-15, the replica health probe did not reach a result because the probe process crashed before connecting; the replica's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-43-15: no-verdict — the probe process crashed before connecting; replica condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the replica" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-06", "english": "For case-43-16, the policy compliance check ran to completion and found the policy bundle defective: a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-43-16: verdict-fail — a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the policy bundle.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The policy bundle passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle" ], "answer": "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-06", "english": "For case-43-16, the policy compliance check did not reach a result because the evaluator lacked the policy input; the policy bundle's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-43-16: no-verdict — the evaluator lacked the policy input; policy bundle condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The policy bundle passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-07", "english": "For case-43-17, the model safety evaluation ran to completion and found the model build defective: the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-43-17: verdict-fail — the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the model build.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The model build is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-07", "english": "For case-43-17, the model safety evaluation did not reach a result because the evaluation host lost power mid-run; the model build's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-43-17: no-verdict — the evaluation host lost power mid-run; model build condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the model build" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-03-08", "english": "For case-43-18, the migration validation job ran to completion and found the migration defective: the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-43-18: verdict-fail — the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the migration.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The migration passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The migration is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the migration" ], "answer": "The migration is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-03-08", "english": "For case-43-18, the migration validation job did not reach a result because the validation database never started; the migration's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-43-18: no-verdict — the validation database never started; migration condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "The migration is reported as defective", "The migration passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-01", "english": "For case-44-11, the deployment smoke suite ran to completion and found the release candidate defective: three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-44-11: verdict-fail — three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the release candidate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The release candidate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-01", "english": "For case-44-11, the deployment smoke suite did not reach a result because runner timed out before assertions; the release candidate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-44-11: no-verdict — runner timed out before assertions; release candidate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-02", "english": "For case-44-12, the archive integrity scan ran to completion and found the archive defective: two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-44-12: verdict-fail — two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the archive.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The archive passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The archive is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the archive" ], "answer": "The archive is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-02", "english": "For case-44-12, the archive integrity scan did not reach a result because object store was unreachable; the archive's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-44-12: no-verdict — object store was unreachable; archive condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "The archive is reported as defective", "The archive passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-03", "english": "For case-44-13, the schema conformance gate ran to completion and found the dataset defective: four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-44-13: verdict-fail — four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the dataset.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The dataset is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-03", "english": "For case-44-13, the schema conformance gate did not reach a result because schema fixture could not be loaded; the dataset's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-44-13: no-verdict — schema fixture could not be loaded; dataset condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-04", "english": "For case-44-14, the certificate verifier ran to completion and found the certificate defective: the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-44-14: verdict-fail — the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the certificate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The certificate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate" ], "answer": "The certificate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-04", "english": "For case-44-14, the certificate verifier did not reach a result because revocation service rate-limited the verifier; the certificate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-44-14: no-verdict — revocation service rate-limited the verifier; certificate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The certificate passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-05", "english": "For case-44-15, the replica health probe ran to completion and found the replica defective: the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-44-15: verdict-fail — the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the replica.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The replica is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-05", "english": "For case-44-15, the replica health probe did not reach a result because the probe process crashed before connecting; the replica's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-44-15: no-verdict — the probe process crashed before connecting; replica condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the replica" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-06", "english": "For case-44-16, the policy compliance check ran to completion and found the policy bundle defective: a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-44-16: verdict-fail — a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the policy bundle.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The policy bundle passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle" ], "answer": "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-06", "english": "For case-44-16, the policy compliance check did not reach a result because the evaluator lacked the policy input; the policy bundle's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-44-16: no-verdict — the evaluator lacked the policy input; policy bundle condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The policy bundle passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-07", "english": "For case-44-17, the model safety evaluation ran to completion and found the model build defective: the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-44-17: verdict-fail — the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the model build.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The model build is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-07", "english": "For case-44-17, the model safety evaluation did not reach a result because the evaluation host lost power mid-run; the model build's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-44-17: no-verdict — the evaluation host lost power mid-run; model build condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the model build" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-04-08", "english": "For case-44-18, the migration validation job ran to completion and found the migration defective: the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-44-18: verdict-fail — the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the migration.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The migration passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The migration is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the migration" ], "answer": "The migration is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-04-08", "english": "For case-44-18, the migration validation job did not reach a result because the validation database never started; the migration's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-44-18: no-verdict — the validation database never started; migration condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "The migration is reported as defective", "The migration passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-01", "english": "For case-45-11, the deployment smoke suite ran to completion and found the release candidate defective: three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-45-11: verdict-fail — three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the release candidate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The release candidate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-01", "english": "For case-45-11, the deployment smoke suite did not reach a result because runner timed out before assertions; the release candidate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-45-11: no-verdict — runner timed out before assertions; release candidate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-02", "english": "For case-45-12, the archive integrity scan ran to completion and found the archive defective: two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-45-12: verdict-fail — two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the archive.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The archive passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The archive is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the archive" ], "answer": "The archive is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-02", "english": "For case-45-12, the archive integrity scan did not reach a result because object store was unreachable; the archive's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-45-12: no-verdict — object store was unreachable; archive condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "The archive is reported as defective", "The archive passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-03", "english": "For case-45-13, the schema conformance gate ran to completion and found the dataset defective: four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-45-13: verdict-fail — four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the dataset.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The dataset is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-03", "english": "For case-45-13, the schema conformance gate did not reach a result because schema fixture could not be loaded; the dataset's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-45-13: no-verdict — schema fixture could not be loaded; dataset condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-04", "english": "For case-45-14, the certificate verifier ran to completion and found the certificate defective: the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-45-14: verdict-fail — the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the certificate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The certificate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate" ], "answer": "The certificate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-04", "english": "For case-45-14, the certificate verifier did not reach a result because revocation service rate-limited the verifier; the certificate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-45-14: no-verdict — revocation service rate-limited the verifier; certificate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The certificate passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-05", "english": "For case-45-15, the replica health probe ran to completion and found the replica defective: the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-45-15: verdict-fail — the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the replica.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The replica is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-05", "english": "For case-45-15, the replica health probe did not reach a result because the probe process crashed before connecting; the replica's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-45-15: no-verdict — the probe process crashed before connecting; replica condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the replica" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-06", "english": "For case-45-16, the policy compliance check ran to completion and found the policy bundle defective: a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-45-16: verdict-fail — a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the policy bundle.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The policy bundle passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle" ], "answer": "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-06", "english": "For case-45-16, the policy compliance check did not reach a result because the evaluator lacked the policy input; the policy bundle's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-45-16: no-verdict — the evaluator lacked the policy input; policy bundle condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The policy bundle passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-07", "english": "For case-45-17, the model safety evaluation ran to completion and found the model build defective: the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-45-17: verdict-fail — the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the model build.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The model build is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-07", "english": "For case-45-17, the model safety evaluation did not reach a result because the evaluation host lost power mid-run; the model build's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-45-17: no-verdict — the evaluation host lost power mid-run; model build condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the model build" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-05-08", "english": "For case-45-18, the migration validation job ran to completion and found the migration defective: the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-45-18: verdict-fail — the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the migration.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The migration passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The migration is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the migration" ], "answer": "The migration is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-05-08", "english": "For case-45-18, the migration validation job did not reach a result because the validation database never started; the migration's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-45-18: no-verdict — the validation database never started; migration condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "The migration is reported as defective", "The migration passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-01", "english": "For case-46-11, the deployment smoke suite ran to completion and found the release candidate defective: three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-46-11: verdict-fail — three contract assertions failed. Repair or roll back the release candidate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The release candidate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-01", "english": "For case-46-11, the deployment smoke suite did not reach a result because runner timed out before assertions; the release candidate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "deployment smoke suite case-46-11: no-verdict — runner timed out before assertions; release candidate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the release candidate?", "options": [ "The release candidate is reported as defective", "The release candidate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the release candidate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-02", "english": "For case-46-12, the archive integrity scan ran to completion and found the archive defective: two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-46-12: verdict-fail — two stored blocks had invalid checksums. Repair or roll back the archive.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The archive passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The archive is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the archive" ], "answer": "The archive is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-02", "english": "For case-46-12, the archive integrity scan did not reach a result because object store was unreachable; the archive's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "archive integrity scan case-46-12: no-verdict — object store was unreachable; archive condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the archive?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "The archive is reported as defective", "The archive passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the archive", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-03", "english": "For case-46-13, the schema conformance gate ran to completion and found the dataset defective: four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-46-13: verdict-fail — four records violated the required schema. Repair or roll back the dataset.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The dataset is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-03", "english": "For case-46-13, the schema conformance gate did not reach a result because schema fixture could not be loaded; the dataset's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "schema conformance gate case-46-13: no-verdict — schema fixture could not be loaded; dataset condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the dataset?", "options": [ "The dataset is reported as defective", "The dataset passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the dataset" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the dataset", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-04", "english": "For case-46-14, the certificate verifier ran to completion and found the certificate defective: the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-46-14: verdict-fail — the signature did not match the public key. Repair or roll back the certificate.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The certificate passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate" ], "answer": "The certificate is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-04", "english": "For case-46-14, the certificate verifier did not reach a result because revocation service rate-limited the verifier; the certificate's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "certificate verifier case-46-14: no-verdict — revocation service rate-limited the verifier; certificate condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the certificate?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "The certificate is reported as defective", "The certificate passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the certificate", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-05", "english": "For case-46-15, the replica health probe ran to completion and found the replica defective: the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-46-15: verdict-fail — the replica returned corrupted state. Repair or roll back the replica.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The replica is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-05", "english": "For case-46-15, the replica health probe did not reach a result because the probe process crashed before connecting; the replica's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "replica health probe case-46-15: no-verdict — the probe process crashed before connecting; replica condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the replica?", "options": [ "The replica is reported as defective", "The replica passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the replica" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the replica", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-06", "english": "For case-46-16, the policy compliance check ran to completion and found the policy bundle defective: a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-46-16: verdict-fail — a forbidden permission was present. Repair or roll back the policy bundle.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The policy bundle passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle" ], "answer": "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-06", "english": "For case-46-16, the policy compliance check did not reach a result because the evaluator lacked the policy input; the policy bundle's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "policy compliance check case-46-16: no-verdict — the evaluator lacked the policy input; policy bundle condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the policy bundle?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "The policy bundle is reported as defective", "The policy bundle passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the policy bundle", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-07", "english": "For case-46-17, the model safety evaluation ran to completion and found the model build defective: the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-46-17: verdict-fail — the build crossed the declared refusal threshold. Repair or roll back the model build.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled" ], "answer": "The model build is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-07", "english": "For case-46-17, the model safety evaluation did not reach a result because the evaluation host lost power mid-run; the model build's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "model safety evaluation case-46-17: no-verdict — the evaluation host lost power mid-run; model build condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the model build?", "options": [ "The model build is reported as defective", "The model build passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the model build" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the model build", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "verdict-fail-06-08", "english": "For case-46-18, the migration validation job ran to completion and found the migration defective: the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the target.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-46-18: verdict-fail — the resulting rows violated the invariant. Repair or roll back the migration.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The migration passed the check", "The check was never scheduled", "The migration is reported as defective", "The check produced no judgment about the migration" ], "answer": "The migration is reported as defective", "form": "verdict-fail", "probe": "completed adverse judgment versus check-side failure" }, { "id": "no-verdict-06-08", "english": "For case-46-18, the migration validation job did not reach a result because the validation database never started; the migration's condition remains unknown. Rerun the check.", "ainglish": "migration validation job case-46-18: no-verdict — the validation database never started; migration condition unknown. Rerun the check.", "question": "What does the report establish about the migration?", "options": [ "The check was never scheduled", "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "The migration is reported as defective", "The migration passed the check" ], "answer": "The check produced no judgment about the migration", "form": "no-verdict", "probe": "check-side failure versus completed adverse judgment" }, { "id": "cal-01", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the amber ticket, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the amber ticket is stored in cabinet 17.", "question": "Where does the message say the amber ticket is stored?", "options": [ "cabinet 17", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "cabinet 17", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-02", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the birch token, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the birch token is stored in shelf 24.", "question": "Where does the message say the birch token is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "shelf 24" ], "answer": "shelf 24", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-03", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the cobalt folder, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the cobalt folder is stored in locker 31.", "question": "Where does the message say the cobalt folder is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "locker 31", "the intake room" ], "answer": "locker 31", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-04", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the dune key, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the dune key is stored in cabinet 42.", "question": "Where does the message say the dune key is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "cabinet 42", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "cabinet 42", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-05", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the elm card, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the elm card is stored in shelf 53.", "question": "Where does the message say the elm card is stored?", "options": [ "shelf 53", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "shelf 53", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-06", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the fern badge, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the fern badge is stored in locker 64.", "question": "Where does the message say the fern badge is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "locker 64" ], "answer": "locker 64", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-07", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the gold seal, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the gold seal is stored in cabinet 75.", "question": "Where does the message say the gold seal is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "cabinet 75", "the intake room" ], "answer": "cabinet 75", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-08", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the hazel note, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the hazel note is stored in shelf 86.", "question": "Where does the message say the hazel note is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "shelf 86", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "shelf 86", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-09", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the indigo disk, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the indigo disk is stored in locker 97.", "question": "Where does the message say the indigo disk is stored?", "options": [ "locker 97", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "locker 97", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-10", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the jade pass, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the jade pass is stored in cabinet 108.", "question": "Where does the message say the jade pass is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "cabinet 108" ], "answer": "cabinet 108", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-11", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the kelp label, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the kelp label is stored in shelf 119.", "question": "Where does the message say the kelp label is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "shelf 119", "the intake room" ], "answer": "shelf 119", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-12", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the linen slip, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the linen slip is stored in locker 120.", "question": "Where does the message say the linen slip is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "locker 120", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "locker 120", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-13", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the moss token, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the moss token is stored in cabinet 131.", "question": "Where does the message say the moss token is stored?", "options": [ "cabinet 131", "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated" ], "answer": "cabinet 131", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-14", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the nickel seal, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the nickel seal is stored in shelf 142.", "question": "Where does the message say the nickel seal is stored?", "options": [ "the intake room", "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "shelf 142" ], "answer": "shelf 142", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-15", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the ochre card, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the ochre card is stored in locker 153.", "question": "Where does the message say the ochre card is stored?", "options": [ "the dispatch room", "no location is stated", "locker 153", "the intake room" ], "answer": "locker 153", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" }, { "id": "cal-16", "calibration": true, "english": "The inventory mentions the pearl key, but states no storage location.", "ainglish": "The inventory says the pearl key is stored in cabinet 164.", "question": "Where does the message say the pearl key is stored?", "options": [ "no location is stated", "cabinet 164", "the intake room", "the dispatch room" ], "answer": "cabinet 164", "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect" } ], "reader_calls": 0 }