{
  "kind": "dexagon.ainglish.flagship-comprehension-closure-carrier.v1",
  "proposal_revision": "must-as-rule-must-as-inference-does-must-impose-a-requiremen",
  "construct": "must-as-rule / must-as-inference",
  "comparison": "complete-careful-English mapping versus the registered compact form",
  "reader_calls": 0,
  "items": [
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-01",
      "english": "The release rule requires the signer to be Alice; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The signer must-as-rule be Alice.",
      "question": "Suppose Alice is not the signer. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the release rule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-01",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the signer is Alice; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The signer must-as-inference be Alice; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose Alice is not the signer. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-02",
      "english": "The security policy requires the gateway to reject unsigned requests; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The gateway must-as-rule reject unsigned requests.",
      "question": "Suppose an unsigned request was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the security policy",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-02",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the gateway rejects unsigned requests; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The gateway must-as-inference reject unsigned requests; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an unsigned request was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-03",
      "english": "The retention specification requires the archive to retain the receipt; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The archive must-as-rule retain the receipt.",
      "question": "Suppose the receipt is missing. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the retention specification",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-03",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the archive retains the receipt; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The archive must-as-inference retain the receipt; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the receipt is missing. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-04",
      "english": "The deployment instruction requires the worker to use the approved image; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The worker must-as-rule use the approved image.",
      "question": "Suppose an unapproved image was used. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the deployment instruction",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-04",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the worker uses the approved image; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The worker must-as-inference use the approved image; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an unapproved image was used. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-05",
      "english": "The reporting standard requires the report to include the checksum; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The report must-as-rule include the checksum.",
      "question": "Suppose the checksum is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the reporting standard",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-05",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the report includes the checksum; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The report must-as-inference include the checksum; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the checksum is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-06",
      "english": "The review rule requires the reviewer to be independent; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The reviewer must-as-rule be independent.",
      "question": "Suppose the reviewer is linked to the author. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the review rule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-06",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the reviewer is independent; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The reviewer must-as-inference be independent; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the reviewer is linked to the author. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-07",
      "english": "The custody policy requires the key to remain offline; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The key must-as-rule remain offline.",
      "question": "Suppose the key was connected. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the custody policy",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-07",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the key remains offline; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The key must-as-inference remain offline; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the key was connected. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-08",
      "english": "The protocol requires the request to carry a nonce; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The request must-as-rule carry a nonce.",
      "question": "Suppose the nonce is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the protocol",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-08",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the request carries a nonce; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The request must-as-inference carry a nonce; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the nonce is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-09",
      "english": "The release schedule requires the build to finish before noon; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The build must-as-rule finish before noon.",
      "question": "Suppose the build finished after noon. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the release schedule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-09",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the build finishes before noon; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The build must-as-inference finish before noon; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the build finished after noon. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-10",
      "english": "The data policy requires the dataset to exclude personal records; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The dataset must-as-rule exclude personal records.",
      "question": "Suppose a personal record is present. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the data policy",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-10",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the dataset excludes personal records; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The dataset must-as-inference exclude personal records; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose a personal record is present. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-11",
      "english": "The governance rule requires the ballot to remain open for one day; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The ballot must-as-rule remain open for one day.",
      "question": "Suppose the ballot closed early. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the governance rule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-11",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the ballot remains open for one day; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The ballot must-as-inference remain open for one day; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the ballot closed early. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-12",
      "english": "The integrity requirement requires the replica to match the digest; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The replica must-as-rule match the digest.",
      "question": "Suppose the digest differs. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the integrity requirement",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-12",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the replica matches the digest; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The replica must-as-inference match the digest; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the digest differs. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-13",
      "english": "The audit instruction requires the operator to record every abort; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The operator must-as-rule record every abort.",
      "question": "Suppose an abort was not recorded. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the audit instruction",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-13",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the operator records every abort; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The operator must-as-inference record every abort; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an abort was not recorded. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-14",
      "english": "The fail-closed contract requires the client to refuse an unknown mode; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The client must-as-rule refuse an unknown mode.",
      "question": "Suppose an unknown mode was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the fail-closed contract",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-14",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the client refuses an unknown mode; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The client must-as-inference refuse an unknown mode; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an unknown mode was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-15",
      "english": "The publication requirement requires the package to include the licence; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The package must-as-rule include the licence.",
      "question": "Suppose the licence is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the publication requirement",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-15",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the package includes the licence; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The package must-as-inference include the licence; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the licence is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-16",
      "english": "The measurement protocol requires the runner to mint before inference; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The runner must-as-rule mint before inference.",
      "question": "Suppose inference began before minting. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the measurement protocol",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-16",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the runner mints before inference; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The runner must-as-inference mint before inference; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose inference began before minting. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-17",
      "english": "The release rule requires the signer to be Alice in test case 17; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The signer must-as-rule be Alice in test case 17.",
      "question": "Suppose Alice is not the signer. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the release rule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-17",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the signer is Alice in test case 17; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The signer must-as-inference be Alice in test case 17; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose Alice is not the signer. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-18",
      "english": "The security policy requires the gateway to reject unsigned requests in test case 18; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The gateway must-as-rule reject unsigned requests in test case 18.",
      "question": "Suppose an unsigned request was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the security policy",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-18",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the gateway rejects unsigned requests in test case 18; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The gateway must-as-inference reject unsigned requests in test case 18; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an unsigned request was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-19",
      "english": "The retention specification requires the archive to retain the receipt in test case 19; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The archive must-as-rule retain the receipt in test case 19.",
      "question": "Suppose the receipt is missing. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the retention specification",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-19",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the archive retains the receipt in test case 19; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The archive must-as-inference retain the receipt in test case 19; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the receipt is missing. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-20",
      "english": "The deployment instruction requires the worker to use the approved image in test case 20; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The worker must-as-rule use the approved image in test case 20.",
      "question": "Suppose an unapproved image was used. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the deployment instruction",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-20",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the worker uses the approved image in test case 20; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The worker must-as-inference use the approved image in test case 20; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an unapproved image was used. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-21",
      "english": "The reporting standard requires the report to include the checksum in test case 21; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The report must-as-rule include the checksum in test case 21.",
      "question": "Suppose the checksum is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the reporting standard",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-21",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the report includes the checksum in test case 21; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The report must-as-inference include the checksum in test case 21; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the checksum is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-22",
      "english": "The review rule requires the reviewer to be independent in test case 22; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The reviewer must-as-rule be independent in test case 22.",
      "question": "Suppose the reviewer is linked to the author. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the review rule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-22",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the reviewer is independent in test case 22; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The reviewer must-as-inference be independent in test case 22; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the reviewer is linked to the author. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-23",
      "english": "The custody policy requires the key to remain offline in test case 23; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The key must-as-rule remain offline in test case 23.",
      "question": "Suppose the key was connected. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the custody policy",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-23",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the key remains offline in test case 23; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The key must-as-inference remain offline in test case 23; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the key was connected. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-24",
      "english": "The protocol requires the request to carry a nonce in test case 24; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The request must-as-rule carry a nonce in test case 24.",
      "question": "Suppose the nonce is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the protocol",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-24",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the request carries a nonce in test case 24; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The request must-as-inference carry a nonce in test case 24; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the nonce is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-25",
      "english": "The release schedule requires the build to finish before noon in test case 25; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The build must-as-rule finish before noon in test case 25.",
      "question": "Suppose the build finished after noon. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the release schedule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-25",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the build finishes before noon in test case 25; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The build must-as-inference finish before noon in test case 25; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the build finished after noon. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-26",
      "english": "The data policy requires the dataset to exclude personal records in test case 26; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The dataset must-as-rule exclude personal records in test case 26.",
      "question": "Suppose a personal record is present. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the data policy",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-26",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the dataset excludes personal records in test case 26; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The dataset must-as-inference exclude personal records in test case 26; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose a personal record is present. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-27",
      "english": "The governance rule requires the ballot to remain open for one day in test case 27; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The ballot must-as-rule remain open for one day in test case 27.",
      "question": "Suppose the ballot closed early. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the governance rule",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-27",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the ballot remains open for one day in test case 27; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The ballot must-as-inference remain open for one day in test case 27; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the ballot closed early. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-28",
      "english": "The integrity requirement requires the replica to match the digest in test case 28; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The replica must-as-rule match the digest in test case 28.",
      "question": "Suppose the digest differs. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the integrity requirement",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-28",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the replica matches the digest in test case 28; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The replica must-as-inference match the digest in test case 28; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the digest differs. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-29",
      "english": "The audit instruction requires the operator to record every abort in test case 29; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The operator must-as-rule record every abort in test case 29.",
      "question": "Suppose an abort was not recorded. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the audit instruction",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-29",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the operator records every abort in test case 29; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The operator must-as-inference record every abort in test case 29; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an abort was not recorded. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-30",
      "english": "The fail-closed contract requires the client to refuse an unknown mode in test case 30; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The client must-as-rule refuse an unknown mode in test case 30.",
      "question": "Suppose an unknown mode was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the fail-closed contract",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-30",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the client refuses an unknown mode in test case 30; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The client must-as-inference refuse an unknown mode in test case 30; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose an unknown mode was accepted. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-31",
      "english": "The publication requirement requires the package to include the licence in test case 31; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The package must-as-rule include the licence in test case 31.",
      "question": "Suppose the licence is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the publication requirement",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-31",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the package includes the licence in test case 31; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The package must-as-inference include the licence in test case 31; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose the licence is absent. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "both consequences necessarily follow",
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-rule-32",
      "english": "The measurement protocol requires the runner to mint before inference in test case 32; this states a duty, not a conclusion that the proposition currently holds.",
      "ainglish": "The runner must-as-rule mint before inference in test case 32.",
      "question": "Suppose inference began before minting. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "neither consequence follows",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a requirement was created by the evidence",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "an applicable requirement was breached",
      "form": "must-as-rule",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-rule",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "the measurement protocol",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-inference-32",
      "english": "The available evidence supports the conclusion that the runner mints before inference in test case 32; this reports an inference and creates no duty.",
      "ainglish": "The runner must-as-inference mint before inference in test case 32; the available evidence points to that conclusion.",
      "question": "Suppose inference began before minting. Which consequence follows from the message?",
      "options": [
        "the stated inference was mistaken",
        "an applicable requirement was breached",
        "a new duty was created",
        "both consequences necessarily follow"
      ],
      "answer": "the stated inference was mistaken",
      "form": "must-as-inference",
      "settlement_stratum": "must-as-inference",
      "strata": {
        "basis": "available evidence",
        "probe": "false-proposition consequence"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-01",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the amber token, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the amber token is in locker 7.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the amber token is?",
      "options": [
        "locker 7",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated"
      ],
      "answer": "locker 7",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-02",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the blue key, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the blue key is in locker 12.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the blue key is?",
      "options": [
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "locker 12"
      ],
      "answer": "locker 12",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-03",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the cedar card, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the cedar card is in drawer 4.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the cedar card is?",
      "options": [
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "drawer 4",
        "the dispatch desk"
      ],
      "answer": "drawer 4",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-04",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the dune badge, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the dune badge is in cabinet 9.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the dune badge is?",
      "options": [
        "the location is not stated",
        "cabinet 9",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room"
      ],
      "answer": "cabinet 9",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-05",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the elm seal, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the elm seal is in vault 3.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the elm seal is?",
      "options": [
        "vault 3",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated"
      ],
      "answer": "vault 3",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-06",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the flint pass, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the flint pass is in locker 15.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the flint pass is?",
      "options": [
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "locker 15"
      ],
      "answer": "locker 15",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-07",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the granite tag, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the granite tag is in drawer 8.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the granite tag is?",
      "options": [
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "drawer 8",
        "the dispatch desk"
      ],
      "answer": "drawer 8",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-08",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the hazel chip, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the hazel chip is in cabinet 2.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the hazel chip is?",
      "options": [
        "the location is not stated",
        "cabinet 2",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room"
      ],
      "answer": "cabinet 2",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-09",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the indigo note, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the indigo note is in vault 11.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the indigo note is?",
      "options": [
        "vault 11",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated"
      ],
      "answer": "vault 11",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-10",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the jade disk, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the jade disk is in locker 5.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the jade disk is?",
      "options": [
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "locker 5"
      ],
      "answer": "locker 5",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-11",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the kelp token, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the kelp token is in drawer 14.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the kelp token is?",
      "options": [
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "drawer 14",
        "the dispatch desk"
      ],
      "answer": "drawer 14",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-12",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the linen key, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the linen key is in cabinet 6.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the linen key is?",
      "options": [
        "the location is not stated",
        "cabinet 6",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room"
      ],
      "answer": "cabinet 6",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-13",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the maple card, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the maple card is in vault 13.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the maple card is?",
      "options": [
        "vault 13",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated"
      ],
      "answer": "vault 13",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-14",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the nickel badge, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the nickel badge is in locker 10.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the nickel badge is?",
      "options": [
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "locker 10"
      ],
      "answer": "locker 10",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-15",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the ochre seal, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the ochre seal is in drawer 1.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the ochre seal is?",
      "options": [
        "the archive room",
        "the location is not stated",
        "drawer 1",
        "the dispatch desk"
      ],
      "answer": "drawer 1",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    },
    {
      "id": "must-force-cal-16",
      "calibration": true,
      "english": "A sealed inventory note mentions the pearl pass, but gives no location.",
      "ainglish": "A sealed inventory note states that the pearl pass is in cabinet 16.",
      "question": "Where does the note state that the pearl pass is?",
      "options": [
        "the location is not stated",
        "cabinet 16",
        "the dispatch desk",
        "the archive room"
      ],
      "answer": "cabinet 16",
      "probe": "construct-free explicit-location planted effect"
    }
  ]
}