[ { "id": "regime-0-00", "english": "In service region R2100, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2100, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2100 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-00", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2100 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2100, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2100 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-00", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2100 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2100, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2100 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-01", "english": "In service region R2101, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2101, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2101 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-01", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2101 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2101, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2101 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-01", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2101 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2101, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2101 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-02", "english": "In service region R2102, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2102, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2102 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-02", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2102 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2102, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2102 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-02", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2102 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2102, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2102 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-03", "english": "In service region R2103, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2103, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2103 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-03", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2103 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2103, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2103 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-03", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2103 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2103, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2103 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-04", "english": "In service region R2104, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2104, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2104 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-04", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2104 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2104, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2104 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-04", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2104 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2104, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2104 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-05", "english": "In service region R2105, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2105, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2105 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-05", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2105 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2105, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2105 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-05", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2105 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2105, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2105 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-06", "english": "In service region R2106, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2106, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2106 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-06", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2106 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2106, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2106 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-06", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2106 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2106, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2106 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-07", "english": "In service region R2107, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2107, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2107 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-07", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2107 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2107, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2107 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-07", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2107 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2107, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2107 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-08", "english": "In service region R2108, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2108, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2108 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-08", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2108 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2108, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2108 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-08", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2108 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2108, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2108 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-09", "english": "In service region R2109, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2109, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2109 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-09", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2109 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2109, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2109 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-09", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2109 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2109, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2109 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-10", "english": "In service region R2110, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2110, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2110 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-10", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2110 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2110, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2110 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-10", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2110 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2110, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2110 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-11", "english": "In service region R2111, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2111, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2111 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-11", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2111 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2111, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2111 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-11", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2111 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2111, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2111 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-12", "english": "In service region R2112, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2112, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2112 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-12", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2112 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2112, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2112 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-12", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2112 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2112, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2112 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-13", "english": "In service region R2113, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2113, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2113 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-13", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2113 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2113, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2113 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-13", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2113 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2113, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2113 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-14", "english": "In service region R2114, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2114, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2114 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-14", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2114 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2114, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2114 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-14", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2114 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2114, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2114 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-15", "english": "In service region R2115, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2115, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2115 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-15", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2115 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2115, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2115 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-15", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2115 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2115, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2115 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-16", "english": "In service region R2116, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2116, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2116 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-16", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2116 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2116, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2116 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-16", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2116 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2116, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2116 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-17", "english": "In service region R2117, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2117, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2117 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-17", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2117 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2117, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2117 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-17", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2117 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2117, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2117 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-18", "english": "In service region R2118, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2118, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2118 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-18", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2118 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2118, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2118 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-18", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2118 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2118, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2118 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-19", "english": "In service region R2119, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2119, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2119 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-19", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2119 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2119, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2119 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-19", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2119 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2119, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2119 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-20", "english": "In service region R2120, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2120, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2120 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-20", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2120 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2120, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2120 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-20", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2120 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2120, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2120 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-21", "english": "In service region R2121, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2121, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2121 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-21", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2121 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2121, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2121 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-21", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2121 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2121, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2121 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-22", "english": "In service region R2122, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2122, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2122 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-22", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2122 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2122, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2122 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-22", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2122 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2122, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2122 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-23", "english": "In service region R2123, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2123, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2123 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-23", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2123 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2123, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2123 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-23", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2123 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2123, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2123 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-24", "english": "In service region R2124, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2124, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2124 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-24", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2124 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2124, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2124 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-24", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2124 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2124, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2124 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-25", "english": "In service region R2125, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2125, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2125 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-25", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2125 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2125, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2125 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-25", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2125 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2125, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2125 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-26", "english": "In service region R2126, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2126, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2126 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-26", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2126 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2126, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2126 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-26", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2126 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2126, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2126 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-27", "english": "In service region R2127, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2127, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2127 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-27", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2127 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2127, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2127 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-27", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2127 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2127, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2127 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-28", "english": "In service region R2128, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2128, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2128 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-28", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2128 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2128, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2128 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-28", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2128 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2128, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2128 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-29", "english": "In service region R2129, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2129, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2129 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-29", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2129 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2129, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2129 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-29", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2129 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2129, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2129 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-30", "english": "In service region R2130, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2130, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2130 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-30", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2130 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2130, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2130 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-30", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2130 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2130, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2130 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-31", "english": "In service region R2131, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2131, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2131 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-31", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2131 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2131, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2131 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-31", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2131 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2131, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2131 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-32", "english": "In service region R2132, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2132, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2132 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-32", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2132 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2132, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2132 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-32", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2132 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2132, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2132 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-33", "english": "In service region R2133, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2133, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2133 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-33", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2133 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2133, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2133 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-33", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2133 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2133, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2133 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-34", "english": "In service region R2134, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2134, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2134 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-34", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2134 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2134, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2134 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-34", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2134 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2134, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2134 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-35", "english": "In service region R2135, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2135, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2135 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-35", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2135 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2135, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2135 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-35", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2135 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2135, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2135 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-36", "english": "In service region R2136, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2136, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2136 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-36", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2136 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2136, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2136 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-36", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2136 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2136, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2136 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-37", "english": "In service region R2137, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2137, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2137 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-37", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2137 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2137, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2137 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-37", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2137 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2137, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2137 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-38", "english": "In service region R2138, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2138, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2138 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-38", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2138 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2138, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2138 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-38", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2138 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2138, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2138 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-39", "english": "In service region R2139, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2139, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2139 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-39", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2139 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2139, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2139 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-39", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2139 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2139, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2139 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-40", "english": "In service region R2140, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2140, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2140 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-40", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2140 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2140, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2140 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-40", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2140 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2140, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2140 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-41", "english": "In service region R2141, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2141, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2141 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-41", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2141 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2141, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2141 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-41", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2141 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2141, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2141 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-42", "english": "In service region R2142, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2142, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2142 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-42", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2142 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2142, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2142 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-42", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2142 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2142, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2142 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-43", "english": "In service region R2143, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2143, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2143 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-43", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2143 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2143, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2143 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-43", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2143 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2143, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2143 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-44", "english": "In service region R2144, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2144, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2144 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-44", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2144 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2144, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2144 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-44", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2144 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2144, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2144 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-45", "english": "In service region R2145, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2145, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2145 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-45", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2145 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2145, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2145 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-45", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2145 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2145, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2145 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-46", "english": "In service region R2146, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2146, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2146 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-46", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2146 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2146, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2146 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-46", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2146 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2146, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2146 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-47", "english": "In service region R2147, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2147, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2147 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-47", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2147 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2147, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2147 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-47", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2147 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2147, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2147 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-48", "english": "In service region R2148, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2148, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2148 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-48", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2148 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2148, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2148 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-48", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2148 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2148, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2148 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-49", "english": "In service region R2149, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2149, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2149 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-49", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2149 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2149, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2149 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-49", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2149 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2149, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2149 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-50", "english": "In service region R2150, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2150, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2150 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-50", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2150 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2150, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2150 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-50", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2150 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2150, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2150 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-51", "english": "In service region R2151, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2151, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2151 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-51", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2151 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2151, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2151 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-51", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2151 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2151, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2151 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-52", "english": "In service region R2152, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2152, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2152 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-52", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2152 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2152, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2152 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-52", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2152 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2152, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2152 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-53", "english": "In service region R2153, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2153, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2153 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-53", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2153 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2153, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2153 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-53", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2153 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2153, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2153 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-54", "english": "In service region R2154, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2154, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2154 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-54", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2154 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2154, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2154 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-54", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2154 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2154, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2154 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-55", "english": "In service region R2155, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2155, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2155 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-55", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2155 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2155, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2155 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-55", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2155 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2155, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2155 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-0-56", "english": "In service region R2156, download replies are valid JSON: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2156, download replies are valid JSON by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2156 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-1-56", "english": "A standing rule requires download replies in service region R2156 to be valid JSON; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2156, download replies are valid JSON by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2156 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-2-56", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown download replies in service region R2156 to be valid JSON; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2156, download replies are valid JSON in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a reply that is not valid JSON in service region R2156 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 0 } }, { "id": "regime-0-57", "english": "In service region R2157, submitted receipts are signed: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2157, submitted receipts are signed by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2157 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-1-57", "english": "A standing rule requires submitted receipts in service region R2157 to be signed; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2157, submitted receipts are signed by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2157 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-2-57", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown submitted receipts in service region R2157 to be signed; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2157, submitted receipts are signed in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unsigned submitted receipt in service region R2157 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 1 } }, { "id": "regime-0-58", "english": "In service region R2158, archive entries are readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2158, archive entries are readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2158 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-1-58", "english": "A standing rule requires archive entries in service region R2158 to be readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2158, archive entries are readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2158 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-2-58", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown archive entries in service region R2158 to be readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2158, archive entries are readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unreadable archive entry in service region R2158 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 2 } }, { "id": "regime-0-59", "english": "In service region R2159, export bundles are encrypted: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2159, export bundles are encrypted by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2159 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-1-59", "english": "A standing rule requires export bundles in service region R2159 to be encrypted; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2159, export bundles are encrypted by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2159 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-2-59", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown export bundles in service region R2159 to be encrypted; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2159, export bundles are encrypted in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an unencrypted export bundle in service region R2159 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 3 } }, { "id": "regime-0-60", "english": "In service region R2160, payment notices are dated: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2160, payment notices are dated by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2160 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-1-60", "english": "A standing rule requires payment notices in service region R2160 to be dated; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2160, payment notices are dated by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2160 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-2-60", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown payment notices in service region R2160 to be dated; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2160, payment notices are dated in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an undated payment notice in service region R2160 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 4 } }, { "id": "regime-0-61", "english": "In service region R2161, sample labels are machine-readable: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2161, sample labels are machine-readable by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2161 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-1-61", "english": "A standing rule requires sample labels in service region R2161 to be machine-readable; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2161, sample labels are machine-readable by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2161 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-2-61", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown sample labels in service region R2161 to be machine-readable; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2161, sample labels are machine-readable in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be a sample label that a machine cannot read in service region R2161 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 5 } }, { "id": "regime-0-62", "english": "In service region R2162, delivery records are uniquely numbered: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2162, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2162 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-1-62", "english": "A standing rule requires delivery records in service region R2162 to be uniquely numbered; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2162, delivery records are uniquely numbered by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2162 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-2-62", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown delivery records in service region R2162 to be uniquely numbered; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2162, delivery records are uniquely numbered in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be two delivery records with the same number in service region R2162 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 6 } }, { "id": "regime-0-63", "english": "In service region R2163, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines: how the system is built makes an exception impossible while the system remains unchanged.", "ainglish": "In service region R2163, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-construction.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2163 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "settlement_stratum": "by-construction", "strata": { "form": "by-construction", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-1-63", "english": "A standing rule requires inventory summaries in service region R2163 to be free of duplicate lines; exceptions are possible and a responsible person owes repair or explanation for each violation.", "ainglish": "In service region R2163, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines by-rule.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2163 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "settlement_stratum": "by-rule", "strata": { "form": "by-rule", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-2-63", "english": "Everything observed so far has shown inventory summaries in service region R2163 to be free of duplicate lines; nothing in this statement prevents or forbids an exception.", "ainglish": "In service region R2163, inventory summaries are free of duplicate lines in-practice.", "question": "Take the statement literally, without assuming it is warranted. 1. Could there be an inventory summary with a duplicate line in service region R2163 while the system remains unchanged? 2. If that is then observed in the same unchanged system, what follows under this statement? Choose the complete pair of answers.", "options": [ "1: yes; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: no; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: no; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "1: no; 2: the claim about the mechanism was false", "1: yes; 2: a responsible person owes a remedy or explanation", "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim" ], "answer": "1: yes; 2: a new observation, with no duty created by this claim", "settlement_stratum": "in-practice", "strata": { "form": "in-practice", "domain": 7 } }, { "id": "regime-cal-0", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-400 is with either Davin or Sela.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-400 is with Davin, not Sela.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-400?", "options": [ "Davin", "Sela", "the information does not determine who", "neither person" ], "answer": "Davin" }, { "id": "regime-cal-1", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-401 is with either Orin or Tova.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-401 is with Orin, not Tova.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-401?", "options": [ "Tova", "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Orin" ], "answer": "Orin" }, { "id": "regime-cal-2", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-402 is with either Mika or Ruel.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-402 is with Mika, not Ruel.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-402?", "options": [ "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Mika", "Ruel" ], "answer": "Mika" }, { "id": "regime-cal-3", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-403 is with either Anya or Leif.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-403 is with Anya, not Leif.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-403?", "options": [ "neither person", "Anya", "Leif", "the information does not determine who" ], "answer": "Anya" }, { "id": "regime-cal-4", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-404 is with either Imra or Bryn.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-404 is with Imra, not Bryn.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-404?", "options": [ "Imra", "Bryn", "the information does not determine who", "neither person" ], "answer": "Imra" }, { "id": "regime-cal-5", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-405 is with either Zora or Huw.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-405 is with Zora, not Huw.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-405?", "options": [ "Huw", "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Zora" ], "answer": "Zora" }, { "id": "regime-cal-6", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-406 is with either Fenn or Nala.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-406 is with Fenn, not Nala.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-406?", "options": [ "the information does not determine who", "neither person", "Fenn", "Nala" ], "answer": "Fenn" }, { "id": "regime-cal-7", "calibration": true, "english": "The sealed bag REGIME-407 is with either Avra or Tari.", "ainglish": "The sealed bag REGIME-407 is with Avra, not Tari.", "question": "Who has the sealed bag REGIME-407?", "options": [ "neither person", "Avra", "Tari", "the information does not determine who" ], "answer": "Avra" } ]