SII 2.74: original edition by Eugen Julius Theodor Hultzsch II. INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PALLAVA DYNASTY. No. 74. UDAYENDIRAM PLATES OF NANDIVARMAN PALLAVAMALLA. author of digital edition Emmanuel Francis DHARMA Paris, CEIAS DHARMA_INSSIIv02p0i0074 DHARMAbase

This inscription has been already published by the Rev. T.Foulkes in the Indian Antiquary (Vol. VIII, p. 273 ff.) and in the Manual of the Salem District (Vol. II, p. 355 ff.). The original plates, together with the originals of four other copper-plate inscriptionsNos. I, III, IV and V of the grants published in the Appendix to Vol. II of the Salem Manual. Nos. I, III and V have been lately re-edited by Professor Kielhorn in the Epigraphia Indica, Vol. III, Nos. 23, 14 and 13. which were also edited by Mr. Foulkes, are preserved at Udayēndiram,No. 174 on the Gudiyatam Taluk Map. a village at the southwestern extremity of the Guḍiyātam tālluqa of the North Arcot district, and were kindly borrowed for me from their present owner by Mr. F.A.Nicholson, I.C.S., Acting Collector of North Arcot. The present whereabouts of two other copper-plate inscriptions from Udayēndiram,Grants B and C, Salem Manual, Vol. II, p. 380 ff. of which Mr. Foulkes obtained transcripts in the Telugu character, I was unable to ascertain. According to Mr. Foulkes, these two inscriptions formed part of a find of “five, or, by another account, seven sets of copper-plate inscriptions,” which was made in 1850 in a subterranean chamber in the Brāhmaṇa street at Udayēndiram. Mr. Foulkes then believed that the remaining three or five sets of the find were lost. As, however, Mr. Foulkes' other grants (I, II, III, IV and V) are now preserved at Udayēndiram and are five in number, I think that they must be identical with the apparently missing five of the seven sets discovered at Udayēndiram in 1850.

The copper-plates which bear the subjoined inscription, are five in number. When they reached my hands, they were strung on a ring, which is cut and bears a circular seal. This contains, in high relief, on a counter-sunk surface, a recumbent bull, which faces the proper right and is placed on a pedestal between two lamps. Over the bull is a seated figure on a pedestal, and between two symbols which I cannot make out. The diameter of the seal is 3(1/4) inches, and that of the ring 4(1/2) to 4(7/8) inches. The ring is about (3/8) inch thick. A comparison of this description of the ring and seal with that given by Mr. Foulkes in the first paragraph of his edition of the plates, suggests that, when he examined the plates, they were accompanied by a different ring and seal. Besides, the seal which is now attached to the plates, does not resemble the seals of other Pallava grants, but is closely allied to the seal of the Udayēndiram plates of the Bāṇa king Vikramāditya II. (Mr. Foulkes' No. V) and of the Gaṅga-Bāṇa king Pṛithivīpati II. Hastimalla (No. 76 below).See No. 4 of the Plate opposite page 104 of Ep. Ind., Vol. III. I therefore believe that it may have originally belonged to one of the two Udayēndiram grants of the Bāṇa dynasty, which are now missing (Mr. Foulkes' grants B and C), and that the original seal-ring of the Pallava plates may have been attached by mistake to one of these two grants and lost along with the latter.

The inscription consists of two distinct portions,—a grant of the Pallava king Nandivarman Pallavamalla in the Sanskrit language and the Grantha character (ll. 1 to 105), and a short inscription of the time of the Chōḷa king Madirai-koṇḍa Kō-Parakēsarivarman in the Tamil language and character (ll. 105 to 109), which, however, looks as if it had been written by the same hand as the first or Pallava part of the inscription. Further, the Grantha and Tamil alphabet of both portions of the inscription is considerably more modern than that of other Pallava grants, and even than that of two other copper-plate inscriptions of Madirai-koṇḍa Kō-Parakēsarivarman.These are No. 76 below, and the Tamil endorsement of Mr. Foulkes' No. I. (Ep. Ind., Vol. III, No. 23). Consequently, the plates are either a forgery, or they are a copy, made at a later date, of two inscriptions, one of Nandivarman Pallavamalla, and one Madirai-koṇḍa Kō-Parakēsarivarman, the originals of which are not within our reach.

The Sanskrit portion of the inscription records that, in the twenty-first year of his reign (l. 38), the Pallava king Nandivarman (v. 4, ll. 36 f. and 37 f.), surnamed Pallavamalla (ll. 36, 46 and 47), granted a village to one hundred and eight Brāhmaṇas (l. 64 f.). This grant was made at the request of one of his military officers or vassals, named Udayachandra (v. 1 and l. 61), who belonged to the race of Pūchān (v. 2, l. 45 f. and v. 7), that had been in the hereditary service of the Pallava race, and who resided at the city of Vilvala (v. 2 and l. 44) on the river Vēgavatī (l. 41). This river passes Conjeeveram, and falls into the Pālāṟu near the village of Villivalam,See p. 345, note 9. which accordingly must be the Tamil original of Vilvala, the Sanskrit name of the capital of Udayachandra. The three opening verses refer to the god Sadāśiva, the chief Udayachandra, and the race of the Pallavas, respectively. Then follows, in prose, a genealogy of the reigning Pallava king, the mythical portion of which (l. 8 ff.) contains the following names:— Brahmā. Aṅgiras. Bṛihaspati. Śaṁyu. Bharadvāja. Drōṇa. Aśvatthāman. Pallava.

The list of the historical descendants of Pallava from Siṁhavishṇu to Paramēśvaravarman II. (l. 11 ff.) need not be repeated here, because it agrees with the list in the Kaśākūḍi plates (p. 344), and because the battles which Narasiṁhavarman I. and Paramēśvaravarman I. are reported to have won,Maṇimaṅgala, where Narasiṁhavarman I. defeated Pulikēśin II, is probably identical with the village of Maṇimaṅgalam in the Chingleput district, on which see Mr. Sewell's Lists of Antiquities, Vol. I, p. 187, and my Annual Report for 1891-92, p. 11. were noticed in the introduction to the Kūram plates (Vol. I, p. 145). A long prose passage (l. 19 ff.) opens with the words: “The son of this Paramēśvaravarman (II.) (was);” is interrupted by verses 4 to 6, which refer to the Pallava king Nandivarman; and appears to be taken up again by the words: “His son was Nandivarman Pallavamalla” (l. 36 f.). Mr. Foulkes concludes from this, that there were two successive Pallava kings of the name Nandivarman, the second of whom was the son of the first and bore the distinctive surname Pallavamalla.Ind. Ant., Vol. VIII, p. 280. I do not think it probable that verses 4 to 6 are to be considered as forming one sentence with the first prose passage (l. 19 ff.), but would prefer to treat these verses as a parenthesis, and the second prose passage (l. 36 f.) as the end of the same sentence which begins with the first prose passage. In this way we obtain only one Pallava king named Nandivarman, who bore the surname Pallavamalla and was the son of Paramēśvaravarman II. This statement is at variance with the Kaśākūḍi plates, according to which Nandivarman Pallavamalla was not the son of his predecessor, but belonged to an entirely different branch of the Pallavas. Here is another point which might induce us to stamp the Udayēndiram plates as a forgery. For, it is difficult to understand how one and the same king could call himself the son of his predecessor in an inscription of his 21st year, and the son of somebody else in an inscription of his 22nd year. Two explanations might, however, be attempted. Nandivarman may have thought it political to give himself out for the adopted son of his predecessor; or it may be assumed that, through mere carelessness, the scribe who drafted the inscription, used the word putra, ‘son’ (ll. 19 and 37), while he wanted to represent Nandivarman only as a successor, and not as the son, of Paramēśvaravarman II.

The most interesting portion of the inscription is the account of the services which Udayachandra rendered to his royal master. When Pallavamalla was besieged in Nandipura by the Dramiḷa princes, Udayachandra came to his rescue and killed with his own hand the Pallava king Chitramāya and others (l. 46 ff.). The name Chitramāya sounds more like a biruda than a real name. Thus the ancient Pallava king Narasiṁha had the biruda Amēyamāya,Vol. I, p. 3, No. 8. and Rājasiṁha that of Māyāchāra.Vol. I, No. 25, paragraph 24. It is not improbable that the Dramiḷa princes whose leader was Chitramāya, were the relations and followers of Nandivarman's predecessor Paramēśvaravarman II. and that they had to be overcome by force, before Nandivarman could establish himself on the throne. Further, Udayachandra is said to have bestowed the kingdom many times on Nandivarman by his victories at Nimba[vana], Chūtavana, Śaṁkaragrāma, Nellūr, Nelvēli, Śūṟāvaṛundūr, etc. (l. 48 ff.). Of these localities, Nellūr is the head-quarter station of the present Nellore district. Another of them, Nelvēli, is mentioned a second time immediately after, as the place near which Udayachandra killed the Śabara king Udayana (l. 52). The Śabaras are generally identified with the modern Sauras, a hill-tribe in the Gañjām and Vizagapatam districts. As, however, the different names of savage tribes are often treated as synonyms by Sanskrit writers, and as the Tamil name Nelvēli cannot possibly be located in the Telugu districts, it may be that the author of the inscription is referring to one of the hill-tribes of the Tamil country, and that Nelvēli is meant for the modern Tinnevelly.Tirunelvēli, ‘the sacred paddy-hedge,’ is the Tamil original of the Anglo-Indian Tinnevelly, the name of the head-quarters of the southernmost district of India. An inscription of Sundara-Pāṇḍya at Tinnevelly calls the deity of the temple Vrīhivṛitīśvara, i.e., ‘the lord of the paddy-hedge,’ and Vēṇuvanēśvara, i.e., ‘the lord of the bamboo-jungle;’ see my Annual Report for 1893-94, p. 7. An additional argument in favour of this view is that, immediately after the description of the war with the Śabaras, the author refers to Udayachandra's achievements “in the Northern region also.” He there pursued and defeated the Nishāda chief Pṛithivivyāghra, who was performing an Aśvamēdha, and drove him out of the district of Vishṇurāja, which he subjected to the Pallava king (l. 55 ff.). Nishāda is, like Śabara, one of the words by which Sanskrit writers designate savage tribes. The district of Vishṇurāja, which was situated to the north of the Pallava country, can be identified with certainty. As Nandivarman was a contemporary of the Western Chalukya king Vikramāditya II. who reigned from A.D. 733-34 to 746-47,See Ep. Ind., Vol. III, p. 2, Table. he was also a contemporary of the Eastern Chalukya king Vishṇuvardhana III. whose reign is placed by Dr. Fleet between A.D. 709 and 746.Ind. Ant., Vol. XX, pp. 99 and 283. He is evidently the Vishṇurāja of the Udayēndiram plates,This identification was already made by Mr. Venkayya in the Madras Christian College Magazine for August 1890. and his district (vishaya) is the country of Vēṅgī, over which the Eastern Chalukyas ruled. The last two items in the list of Udayachandra's deeds are, that he destroyed the fort of Kāḷidurga,Mr. Foulkes (Ind. Ant., Vol. VIII, p. 283) proposed to identify this place with the modern Calicut; but the Tamil form of this name is not Kāḷikkōṭṭai, but Kaḷḷikkōṭṭai, and its Malayāḷam name is Kōṛikkōḍu or Kōṛikkūḍu. and that he defeated the Pāṇḍya army at the village of Maṇṇaikuḍi (l. 59 ff.).

The grant which was made by Nandivarman Pallavamalla at the request of Udayachandra, consisted of the village of Kumāramaṅgala-Veḷḷaṭṭūr, which belonged to the district called Paśchimāśrayanadī-vishaya, and of two water-levers (jala-yantra) in the neighbouring village of Koṟṟagrāma, which appear to have been added in order to supply the former village with means of irrigation. As in the case of other grants, the original name of the village was changed into Udayachandramaṅgalam in commemoration of Udayachandra, at whose instance the donation was made (l. 62 ff.). The description of the boundaries of Udayachandramaṅgalam is given in great detail (l. 65 ff.). Among the boundaries we find, in the east, a small river; in the south, the temple of Koṟṟagrāma, the same village, a portion of which had been included in the granted village; in the north, the village of Kāñchidvāra, which, in its Tamil form Kāñchivāyil, is referred to in line 107 of the present inscription, and in another copper-plate grant from Udayēndiram;Ep. Ind., Vol. III, p. 144 f. See also Ind. Ant., Vol. XXII, p. 67, note 63. and in the north-east, the river Kshīranadī, the Tamil name of which is Pālāṟu. As the modern village of Udayēndiram is situated on the Pālāṟu river; as the original of the present inscription is preserved, and was most probably discovered, at Udayēndiram; and as the Tamil name Udayēndiram bears a close resemblance to the Sanskrit name Udayachandramaṅgalam, and still more so to the forms Udayēnduchaturvēdimaṅgalam and Udayēndumaṅgalam, which occur in two other Udayēndiram grants,No. 76 below, verse 26; and Ep. Ind., Vol. III, p. 75.—there is no doubt that Mr. Le Fanu is correct in identifying the granted village of Udayachandramaṅgalam with the modern Udayēndiram.Preface to the Salem Manual, Vol. I, p. iv. This village is now situated on the northern bank of the Pālāṟu, while Udayachandramaṅgalam is said to have been bounded by the Kshīranadī on the north-east, and by an unnamed small river on the east. It must be therefore assumed that either, as Mr. Le Fanu suggests, the Pālāṟu has changed its bed, or that the name Udayēndiram has travelled across the river in the course of the past eleven centuries. Paśchim-āśrayanadī-vishaya, the name of the district to which the granted village belonged, is a literal Sanskrit translation of the Tamil territorial term Mēl-Aḍaiyāṟu-nāḍu, which, according to another Udayēndiram grant (No. 76 below), was a subdivision of the district of Paḍuvūr-kōṭṭam.

The remainder of the prose portion enumerates the Brāhmaṇa donees (l. 75 ff.), who, according to line 64, were one hundred and eight in number. The actual number of the donees is, however, sixty-three, and that of the shares one hundred and thirty-three. This discrepancy is a third point which suggests that the inscription may be a forgery.

Of the two concluding verses, the first (v. 7) refers to the race of Pūchān, and the second (v. 8) informs us that the inscription,—which, like the Kūram and Kaśākūḍi inscriptions,See the two last lines of page 345. is styled a eulogy (praśasti, ll. 101 and 105),—was composed by the poet Paramēśvara, who also received one of the shares of the granted village (l. 101 f.).

The Tamil endorsement (l. 105 ff.) is dated in the 26th year of the reign of Madiraikoṇḍa Kō-Parakēsarivarman, i.e., of the Chōḷa king Parāntaka I.,See Vol. I, p. 112; Ep. Ind., Vol. III, p. 280; and the introductions to Nos. 75 and 76 below. and records that the villagers of Udayachandramaṅgalam agreed with those of the neighbouring village of Kāñchivāyil,See the first three lines of this page. which was also called Igaṉmaṟaimaṅgalam, to form one village of the two. Another copy of the Tamil endorsement has been added on the first, originally blank side of the first plate of another Udayēndiram grant.Ep. Ind., Vol. III, p. 147.

Further conversion of digital encoding to DHARMA encoding scheme according to EGD (Encoding Guide for Diplomatic Editions) Conversion of digital encoding to DHARMA encoding scheme according to EGD (Encoding Guide for Diplomatic Editions)

śriī svasti . sumerugirimūrddhani pravarayogabandhāsanaṁ jagattrayavibhūtaye raviśaśāṁkanetradvayamumāsahitamādarā dudayacandralatkṣmīpradam·ṁ sadāśivamahannamāmi śirasā jaṭādhā riṇam· . 1 śrīmānanekaraṇabhuūvmiṣu pallavāya rājyapradaḥ para hitaḥ paracakradaṇḍī . pūcānkulasya tilakaḥ prathitaḥ praṛthivyāṁ sthe yātsa vilvalapurādhipaniścirāya . 2 bhūpālavanditapadadvayapallavānā ndānām·bubhāravinamantkarapallavānām . samyagguṇāoccayanīirastavipalla vānāmaṁ vaṁśaścirañjagati tiṣṭhatu pallavānām· 3 Avyaktātdbrahmā Aājāya ta brahmaṇoṁgirā Aṁgiraso bṛhaspatiḥrbraṛhaspateḥ śaṁyuḥ śaṁ yorbharadvājaḥo bharadvājāddroṇaḥo Aśvatthāmā tato nirākṛtāakulavipallavaḥ pallavaḥ . Evamanu krameṇa santatiparamparayābhivarddhamāne pallavakule bhaktyārādhi taviṣṇuḥ siṁhaviṣṇuḥ . siṁhaviṣṇorapi mahendrasadraṛśavikramo mahendravarmmā . tasmāt·dagastya Iva vimathitavātāpiḥ pariyaḷamaṇimaṁ galaśūramāraprabhraṛtiṣu jetā bahuśo vallabharājasya narasiṁ havarmmā . tasya putraḥ punareva mahendravarmmā . tataḥ peruvaḷanallūryyuddhe vi jitaḥvallabhabalaḥ parameśvaravarmmā . tasmātparamamāheśvaraḥ paramabrahma ṇyo narasiṁhavarmmā . tasya parameśvara Ivādhikadarśanaḥ paramadhārmmikaḥ parameśvaravarmmā . tasya parameśvaravarmṇṇaḥ putro bharata Iva sarvvadama no merurivācalaḥo divasakara Iva svakaraireva riputamasānniro dhabhedakaḥ śaśadhara Iva sakalakalāpariṇataḥo nyakkṛtanraṛganaḷaniṣadhana huṣanābhāgabhagīrathādyamānaḥ paranarapatigaṇḍasthalavigaḷitama dajalāadhārādurddinakalmāṣiīkṛtavāmetarabāhuda ṇḍaḥo digarantavijraṛm·bhamāṇakumudavanavipulakiīttrtiḥ praṇatāvanipatima kuṭamālikālīḍhacaraṇāravindaḥ kusumacāpa Iva vapuṣi vatsarāa ja Iva kuñjareṣu nakula Iva turaṁgameṣu Aṣvarjjuana Iva kārmmuke droṇa I va dhanurvvede kāvyanāṭakākhyāyikāsu praviṇaḥī ṇe bindumatīgūḍhacatu rtthapraṇairttarakṣaracyutakamātraācyutakādiṣu nipuṇaḥo nayanidhirddhana bhājanaḥ kalaṁkarahitaḥ kalibalamarddanaḥ kalpakavrataḥ . kṛtānto ripūṇāmanaṁ go vadhūnāmalaṁghyo balānāmanūno guṇānāṁ . śaraṇyaḥ prajānāṁ satāṁ kalpavraṛkṣaḥ kṛtī nandivarmmā patiḥ pallavaānaām· 4 tīkṣṇairbāṇairyyo na ranāthaḥ karisainyam· bhindannājau rājati rājā raṇaśūraḥ . mandam· bhindandhvā ntasamūhaṁ karajālairudyannadrau paṁkajabandhussaviteva . 5 jaitra ndhanuẖkaravibhūṣaṇamaṁgarāgassenāmukheṣu ripuvāraṇadānavāri . Ā kalvalpamatutra parametadudārakiīrtteryyasya prabhorbhavati palla vaketanasya 6 narapatiradhipatiravanernnayabharaḥ pallavamallo na ndivarmmā tasya putro babhūva tasminmahiīṁ śāsati narapatau tasyaiva na ndivarmmaṇo Ekaviṁśatisaṁkhyām pūrayati saṁvatsare kramukanā ḷikerasahakāratālahintālatamālanāgapunnāgaraktāśokakura svakamādhavīkaṇṇrṇīkāraprabhūṛtitarubhavanopaśobhitatīrāyāḥ mada vighūṇṇrṇītamānasamaānīinikucamukhodvyātakuṁkumagandhaaāyā vegavatyā nadyāḥ patirjjalaladāgamajalamerarasarasāsitajaladopamapa ravāraṇakulapuṣkaravivarāntaraparinirggatasalilotlbaṇakaṇikā citavipaṇīpathasya sakalabhuvanatalalalāmabhūtasya vilvalā bhidhānasya nagarasyādhipatiḥ pallavakulaḥparam·parāgate pūcā nkule prasūto dramiḷanarapatibhiruparuddham· pallavamallannandipuure draṛṣṭvā tada kṣamayā kuvalayadaladyutinā niśitena kṛpāṇena pallavamallaśatrubravṛnda sya kṛtānta Iva vijraṛm·bhamāṇaścitramāyapallavarājamukhānnihatya sakala meva rājyaṁ prayaccchannim·bavanacūtavanaśaṁkaragrāmanellūr·nelveliśūṟāvaḻu ntūr·prabhṛtiṣu raṇabhuūvmiṣu pallavāya bahuśaḥ parabalamṁ vijetā praaākṛtajanadurvvigāhye bhairanenavetabāhudaṇḍaḥ pratipakṣamudayanā bhidhānaṁ śabararājam· bhi nelvelisaṁgrāme śaṁkhbarasenaāpa tisamaaārūḍhadantidantayugaḷasaṁghaṭṭanakṣaritamadajālasamaaālaṁ kṛtabāhudaṇḍaḥ pratipakṣamudayanābhidhānaṁ śabararājam· hbhi ttvā mayūrakalāpaviracitandarppaṇaddhvajaṁ graṛhītavāna Uuttarasyā mapi diśi praṛthivivyāghrābhidhānanniṣaaādapatim· prabalāyamānamaśvame dhaturaṁgamaaānusaāraiṇamiāpatamanusraṛtya vijitya viṣṇurājaviṣayātpa llavaṁsātkṛtyādiśanniravadyapramukhāṁśuhārān·naparimitasuva ṇṇrṇasandheṁcayaṁ kuñjarānapi yo jagrāha kāḷībhagavatiīpari pālitakāḷidurggaṁ vighaṭayitvāyya maṇṇaikuṭḍigrāme pāṇḍyasenāṁ vijitavāna Uuudayacandrāa>khyadhīravaraḥ paracakradaṇḍī svāmine vijñapta vānan . tadvijñoāpanayā sakalarājyapradāturasidhārāniṣkrayārttha m· paśrimāśrayanadiīviṣaye kumāramaṁgalaveḷḷaṭṭuūrkkoṟṟagrā me jalayantradvayañṁ ca Uodayacandramaṁgalamiti nāma kṛtvāAṣṭottaraśatebhyo brāhmaṇebhyo dadau . tasya purastātsīmā stokanadiī . dakṣi ṇatassīmā samudradattaccaturvvedimaṁgalasyottarataścakratīrtthā duttaratastataḥ paścime koṟṟagrāmadevagraṛhāduttaratastataḥ paści me pūrvvavatsamudradattaccaturvvedimaṁgalasya paścimottaratassīmā duragahradāduttaratastasmātpaścimeAnaḍutpālācaladakṣiṇapārśvam· Asya pratīcayaḥ siīmā lohitagiristasmāduttarato gatvā ve ḷālaśikharātpaurastātkṛṣṇaśilaśiloccayātpaścime rau hiṇaguhā paścimottaratassīmā sinduvārahra daḥ . Uttaratassiīmā kāñcidvāranāmagrāmasya dakṣiṇatassiīmāddakṣi ṇataḥ . prāgudiīcasaḥ sīmā kṣiīranadido . Evañcatussīmāntarāṁ nadiīkulyājāalabho gyāṁ suasarvvaparihāraām· Amanyānadhammrmakṛtyāanvināśya bhūmindattavān· kauṇḍinya gotrāya pravajcanasūtrāya rutdraśarmmaṇe bhāgadvayam· . tatdgotrasūtrāya gaṇadiṇḍa śarmmaṇe tatdgotrasūtrāya gaṇamātaśarmmaṇe tatdgotrasūtrāya dāmaśammrma ṇe tatdgotrasūtrāya Agniśarmmaṇe tatdgotrasūtrāya maṇṭaśarmmaṇe tatdgotraĀvaāyāpa stam·bhasūtrāya mādhavaśammrmaṇe tatdgotrasūtrāya maṇaṇṭaśarmmaṇe tatdgotrasūtrāya nārā yaṇaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavaddroṇaśammrmaṇe pūrvvavat· Agniśammrmaṇe kāśyapagotrāya Ā pastam·basūtrāya bhavamātabhaṭṭāya bhāgatrayantadvanmaṇiśarmmaṇe bhāgadvayantadvatkāḷaśammrma ṇe tadvat· tiṇṭaśammrmaṇe tadvadviīramaṇṭāya tadvatkūḷāya bhāradvājagotra Āvāyāpastam·bhasūtrāya ru drakumārāya tadvatsuskandāya tadvannārāyaṇāya tadvattāḻiśarmmaṇe tadvacceṭṭaśarmmaṇe tatdgo trāya pravacanasūtrāya śūlamaṇṭāya tadvatskantdāya tadvaddroṇarudrāya jātugaūkarṇagotrāya pravajca nasūtrāya poṟkūḷakeyāya vatsagotrāya Āvpastam·bhasūtrāya Abhuṇḍigovinda śarmmaṇe pūrvvavata māvanmādhavaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavatdbhadrakāḷāya pū pūrvvavattāḻiśarmmaṇe pūrvvavannīlakaṇaṇṭṭhaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavat· rāmaśammrmaṇe AĀgni vaieśyagotre Aāyāpastam·bhasūtrāya droṇaśarmmaṇe vādhūlagotrāya Āpastam·bha sūtrāya nārāyaṇāya Ātreyagotrāya Āpastam·pabhasūtrāya caṭṭipuranandine viṣṇaupravṛddhagotrāya bahuvraṛcaāya nimabadāsiśammrmaṇe pūrvvavannīlaka ṇṭhāya pūrvvavatpiṭṭaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavanniīlakaṇṭhāya leohitagotrāya Āpa stam·bhasūtrāya kārām·pbinantdiśammrmaṇe vasiṣṭhagotrāya pravacanasūtrāya kāva nūrmaṇaṇṭaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavat droṇaśarmmaṇe gotamagotrāya Āpastam·bhasūtrā ya nimambaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavata Adagniśammrmaṇe tatdgotrāya pravacanasūtrāya rudramaṇṭāya bhā gadvayam· . parāśaragotrāya pravacanasūtrāya gaṇamātaśarmmaṇe pūrvvavanmādhavaśarmmaṇe tatdgotrāya Āpastam·bhasūtrāya nākgaśarmmaṇe haritagotrāyāpastam·bhasūtrāya vinā yakaśarmmaṇe tadvat· skandāya tadvatkoṇṭāya tadvattddāmaśarmmaṇe tadvattddevaśammrmaṇe mu tdgalagotrāyāpastam·bhasūtrāya cannakāḷine pūrvvavaddroṇāya kauśikago trāyāpastam·bhasūtrāya kumāramaṇṭāya tatdvaccacnakumārāya tatgotrāya pravacanasūtrāya tiṇaṇṭadroṇaśarmmaṇe bhāgadvayam· . tatdgotrāyāpastam·bhasūtrāya kūḷaśarmmaṇe . kaṭukucattipālapocanan Oṟṟiyūran . praśattstikatre parameśvarāya Uttarakākulo tdbhavāyaiko bhāgaḥ . vaijdyabhāgaśca . gaṁgapuravāsinano droṇaśreṣṭhiraṇaputrasya re vatināmnaḥ paramamāheśvarasya dvau bhāgau yāvaccarati khe bhānuryyāvattiṣṭha nti parvvatāḥ . pūcānkulañca vai tāvat· stheyādācandratārakam· . 7 putraḥ śriīcandradevasya kavi tvastu parameśvaraḥ praśasteḥ kavitāñcakre sa medhāvikulotdbhavaḥ . 8 ...

matirai koṇṭa kopparakesaripanmaṟkku yāṇṭu Irupattāṟāvatu Utayacantiramaṅkala ttu sabhaiyomum kāñcivāyilākiya Ikanmaṟaimaṅkalattu sabhaiyomum . Ivviraṇṭuūromuṅkūṭiyonṟānamaiyil Itan melppaṭṭatu Oruūrāy vā ḻvomānom ...

°bandhāsanaṁ The anusvāra stands at the beginning of the next line. °dvayamumā° Separate ºdvayam umāº. °vānāmaṁ vaṁśa° Read ºvānāṁ vaṁśaº; the missing va appears to be entered above the line by the engraver himself. °maṇimaṁ The anusvāra stands at the beginning of the next line. °rtthapraṇairttarakṣara° Read ºthaipādaprehīlakākṣaraº ? bhindannājau jau appears to be corrected from jai. °vaketanasya va appears to be corrected from vi. patirjjalaladāgama° A second, obliterated la stands below the la of jalada. °gamajalamerarasarasāsita° Read ºgamakālamelārasāsitaº ? °pūure Corrected from pūre by the engraver. °nellū° The e and the second l of nellūr are doubtful; on the facsimile published in the Ind. Ant., the e looks like va, which must be due to retouching. bhairanenave The bracketted words which follow, were entered by mistake and subsequently cancelled by the engraver himself; they occur in their proper place in line 54. °siīmād° Read sīmāº. Here and in line 68 f. the incorrect masculine sīma is used instead of sīmā or sīman. pū This line appears to have originally ended with the letter pū, which was erased by the engraver, because he had repeated it at the beginning of line 87. . In the original, this sign of punctuation looks like a double ṟa.
A.—Sanskrit portion.

Hail! Prosperity!

(Verse 1.) I bow my head devoutly to Sadāśiva, who is seated in the position of profound meditation on the peak of the Sumēru mountain for the welfare of the three worlds; whose two eyes are the sun and the moon; who is united with Umā; who has conferred splendour on Udayachandra; (and) who wears matted hair.

(V. 2.) Let him remain for a long time, the glorious lord of Vilvalapura, the ornament of the race of Pūchān, who has conferred the kingdom on the Pallava (king) on many battle-fields, who is benevolent, who is a chastiser of hostile armies, (and) who is renowned on earth!

(V. 3.) Let it remain in the world for a long time, the race of the Pallavas, whose feet, (tender) as sprouts, are worshipped by kings; whose hands, (tender) as sprouts, are bending under the weight of the water (poured out) at donations; (and) who have driven away (even) the slightest calamity by the multitude of (their) excellent virtues!

(Line 8.) From the supreme soul was produced Brahmā; from Brahmā, Aṅgiras; from Aṅgiras, Bṛihaspati; from Bṛihaspati, Śaṁyu; from Śaṁyu, Bharadvāja; from Bharadvāja, Drōṇa; from Drōṇa, Aśvatthāman, the splendour of whose power was immeasurable; (and) from him, Pallava, who drove away (even) the smallest calamity from (his) race.

(L. 11.) In the race of Pallava, which thus flourished in an uninterrupted line of regular descent, (was born) Siṁhavishṇu, a devout worshipper of Vishṇu; from Siṁhavishṇu, Mahēndravarman, whose valour equalled (that of) Mahēndra; from him, Narasiṁhavarman, who destroyed (the city of) Vātāpi, just as Agastya destroyed (the demon) Vātāpi, (and) who frequently conquered Vallabharāja at Pariyaḷa, Maṇimaṅgala, Śūramāra and other (places). His son (was) another Mahēndravarman. From him (came) Paramēśvaravarman, who defeated the army of Vallabha in the battle of Peruvaḷanallūr; from him, Narasiṁhavarman, who was a devout worshipper of Mahēśvara (and) a great patron of Brāhmaṇas. His (son was) the very pious Paramēśvaravarman, whose beauty (darśana) surpassed (that of all others), just as Paramēśvara (Śiva) has (one) eye (darśana) more (than all others).

(L. 19.) The son of this Paramēśvaravarman (was) he who was a conqueror of all, like Bharata; who was immovable, like (Mount) Mēru; who broke the opposing (forces of his) enemies by his own hands, as the sun breaks the opposing (masses of) darkness by his own rays; who was versed in all the fine arts (kalā), just as the (full-) moon possesses all digits (kalā); who lowered the pride of Nṛiga, Nala (of) Nishadha, Nahusha, Nābhāga, Bhagīratha and other (kings); whose powerful right arm had become spotted by showers of streams of rutting-juice, which oozed from the temples (of the elephants) of hostile kings; whose great fame, (which resembled) a group of white water-lilies, filled (all) quarters; whose lotus feet were rubbed by the multitude of the diadems of prostrate kings; who resembled Cupid in beauty, the king of VatsaSee p. 357, note 6. in (the knowledge of) elephants, Nakula in (the management of) horses, Arjuna in (the use of) the bow, (and) Drōṇa in archery; who was versed in poems, dramas and stories; who was skilled in the bindumatī, gūḍhachaturthapāda, prahēlikā, aksharachyutaka, mātrāchyutaka and similar (verses);These terms are explained in the commentary on the Kādambarī, p. 14 f. of the Bombay edition of 1890. who was a treasury of policy, a vessel of wealth, free from spots, a destroyer of the power of the Kali (age), (and) devoted (to liberality) as the Kalpaka (tree);—This sentence is interrupted by verses 4 to 6, but is again taken up in line 36.

(V. 4.) The virtuous Nandivarman, the lord of the Pallavas, (is) the death of enemies, a Cupid to women, unconquerable by armies, rich in virtues, the refuge of subjects, (and) a Kalpa tree to good men.

(V. 5.) Breaking in battle an army of elephants by sharp arrows, this king, the lord of men (and) hero in war, shines like the sun, the friend of the lotus, who gradually breaks the mass of darkness by the bundles of (his) rays (and) rises over the mountain.

(V. 6.) Until the end of the world, the favourite (ornaments) on earth of this renowned lord, the banner of the Pallavas, are the following:—the victorious bow (which is) the ornament of (his) hand, (and) the rutting-juice of hostile elephants at the head of battles, (which is) the unguent of (his) body.

(L. 36.) His sonThe words tasya putraḥ are here repeated for the sake of clearness, though they had already occurred in line 19, at the beginning of the prose passage which was interrupted in line 29 by verses 4 to 6. was Nandivarman, the lord of men, the lord of the earth, the statesman,With the epithet Nayabhara compare Bahunaya and Nayānusārin, two epithets of Rājasiṁha; Vol. I, No. 25, paragraphs 3 and 42. the wrestler of the Pallavas (Pallavamalla).

(L. 37.) While this lord of men was ruling the earth, in the year which was completing the number twenty-one (of the years of the reign) of this same Nandivarman, a requestThis request, which refers to a grant of land, is specified in l. 62 ff. was made to the lord (viz., Nandivarman) by the chastiser of hostile armies,The same epithet occurs in verse 2. the excellent hero, called Udayachandra, who was the lord of the river Vēgavatī, the banks of which are adorned with bowers of areca-palms, cocoanut-trees, mango-trees, palmyras, hintāla, tamāla, nāga, puṁnāga, red aśōka, kuravaka, mādhavī, karṇikāra and other trees, (and) which smells of saffron that has come off from the tips of the breasts of proud women, whose minds are intoxicated with passion; who was the lord of the city called Vilvala, which is the ornament of the whole world, (and) the bāzār roads of which are covered with copious drops of water, that has trickled out of the nostrils of the trunks of troops of hostile elephants, which resemble clouds, black like ink, in the rainy season; who was born in the race of Pūchān, which had been handed down by (i.e., had been in the hereditary service of) the uninterrupted succession of the Pallava race; who, when he perceived that Pallavamalla was besieged in Nandipura by the Dramiḷa princes, unable to bear this, like the visible death of the crowd of the enemies of Pallavamalla, slew with (his) sharp sword, which glittered like the petal of a water-lily, the Pallava king Chitramāya and others; who defeated the hostile army on the battle-fields of Nimba[vana], Chūtavana, Śaṁkaragrāma, Nellūr, Nelvēli, Śūṟāvaṛundūr and so forth, and (thus) bestowed the whole kingdom many times on the Pallava; who, while his strong arm became adorned with the copious rutting-juiceCompare line 23 and verse 6. which oozed out at (his) collision with the pair of tusks of the elephant on which the leader of the Śabara army was mounted, split (the head of) the opposing Śabara king, called Udayana, in the terrible battle of Nelvēli, which could hardly be entered by a common man, and seized (his) mirror-banner made of a peacock's tail; who, in the Northern region also, pursued the Nishāda chief, called Pṛithivivyāghra, who, desiring to become very powerful, was running after the horse of the Aśvamēdha, defeated (him), ordered (him) out of the district (vishaya) of Vishṇurāja, (which) he subjected to the Pallava, and seized faultless pearl necklaces of excellent lustre, an immeasurable heap of gold, and elephants; (and) who destroyed (the fort of) Kāḷidurga, which was protected by the goddess Kālī, and defeated the Pāṇḍya army at the village of Maṇṇaikuḍi.

(L. 62.) At his (Udayachandra's) request, (king Nandivarman) gave, in order to reward (the deeds of) the edge of the sword of him who had bestowed the whole kingdom (on his lord),Compare the words sakalameva rājyaṁ prayacchan . . . . . raṇabhūmiṣu pallavAya in l. 48 ff. and anekaraṇabhūmiṣu pallavāya rājyapradaḥ in verse 2. to one hundred and eight Brāhmaṇas the village of Kumāramaṅgala-Veḷḷaṭṭūr in the Paśchimāśrayanadī-vishaya, and two water-levers (jala-yantra) in (the village of) Koṟṟagrāma, having conferred (on the granted village) the (new) name of Udayachandramaṅgalam.

(L. 65.) The eastern boundary of this (village is) a small river. The southern boundary (is) on the north of (the village called) Samudradatta-chaturvēdimaṅgalam, (and) on the north of (the tank called) Chakratīrtha; (going) to the west from this, on the north of the temple (dēvagṛiha) of Koṟṟagrāma; (going) to the west from this, on the north of the north-western boundary of the previously (mentioned village of) Samudradatta-chaturvēdimaṅgalam (and) of (the tank called) Uragahrada; (and going) to the west from this, the southern side of (the hill called) Anaḍutpālāchala. Its western boundary (is the hill called) Lōhitagiri; going north from this, (the western boundary is) on the east of (the hill called) Vēḷālaśikhara; (and) on the west of (the hill called) Kṛishṇaśila-śilōchchaya, (the cave called) Rauhiṇaguhā. The north-western boundary (is the tank called) Sindhuvārahrada. The northern boundary (is) on the south of the southern boundary of the village called Kāñchidvāra. The north-eastern boundary (is) the (river) Kshīranadī.

(L. 74.) (The king) gave the land included within these four boundaries, with the use of the water of the rivers and canals, with all exemptions, having expropriated others (viz., Jaina hereties ?),Compare No. 76 below, verse 27 f. and line 97 f. whose observances were not in accordance with the law.

(L. 75.) LIST OF DONEES. [[here is a table]]. [C1]No. [C2]Gōtra. [C3]Sūtra. [C4]Residence. [C5]Name of donee. [C6]Number of shares. [C1]1. [C2]Kauṇḍinya. [C3]Pravachana [C4]... [C5]Rudraśarman [C6]2 [C1]2. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Gaṇadiṇḍaśarman [C6]3 [C1]3. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Gaṇamātaśarman [C6]3 [C1]4. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Dāmaśarman [C6]3 [C1]5. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Agniśarman [C6]3 [C1]6. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Maṇṭaśarman [C6]3 [C1]7. [C2]Do. [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Mādhavaśarman [C6]3 [C1]8. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Maṇṭaśarman [C6]3 [C1]9. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Nārāyaṇaśarman [C6]3 [C1]10. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Drōṇaśarman [C6]3 [C1]11. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Agniśarman [C6]3 [C1]12. [C2]Kāśyapa. [C3]ĀpastambaThis is the only instance, in which the name of the sūtra is spelled in the usual manner, while the form Āpastambha is employed in all other cases. [C4]... [C5]Bhavamātabhaṭṭa [C6]3 [C1]13. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Maṇiśarman [C6]2 [C1]14. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Kāḷaśarman [C6]2 [C1]15. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Tiṇṭaśarman [C6]2 [C1]16. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Vīramaṇṭa [C6]2 [C1]17. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Kūḷa [C6]2 [C1]18. [C2]Bhāradvāja [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Rudrakumāra [C6]2 [C1]19. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Skanda [C6]2 [C1]20. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Nārāyaṇa [C6]2 [C1]21. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Tāṛiśarman [C6]2 [C1]22. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]ChēṭṭaśarmanThis would be Jyēshṭhaśarman in Sanskrit. [C6]2 [C1]23. [C2]Do. [C3]Pravachana [C4]... [C5]Śūlamaṇṭa [C6]2 [C1]24. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Skanda [C6]2 [C1]25. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Drōṇarudra [C6]2 [C1]26. [C2]Jātūkarṇa [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Poṟkūḷakēya [C6]2 [C1]27. [C2]Vatsa. [C3]Āpastambha [C4]Abhuṇḍi [C5]Gōvindaśarman [C6]2 [C1]28. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Mādhavaśarman [C6]2 [C1]29. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Bhadrakāḷa [C6]2 [C1]30. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Tāṛiśarman [C6]2 [C1]31. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Nīlakaṇṭhaśarman [C6]2 [C1]32. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Rāmaśarman [C6]2 [C1]33. [C2]Āgnivēśya [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Drōṇaśarman [C6]2 [C1]34. [C2]Vādhūla [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Nārāyaṇa [C6]2 [C1]35. [C2]Ātrēya [C3]Do. [C4]Chaṭṭipura [C5]Nandin [C6]2 [C1]36. [C2]Vishṇuvṛiddha [C3]BahvṛichaThis is not the name of a sūtra, but that of a śākha; the sūtra is not mentioned in this case. [C4]... [C5]Nimbadāsiśarman [C6]2 [C1]37. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Nīlakaṇṭha [C6]2 [C1]38. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Piṭṭaśarman [C6]2 [C1]39. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Nīlakaṇṭha [C6]2 [C1]40. [C2]Lōhita [C3]Āpastambha [C4]Kārāmbi [C5]Nandiśarman [C6]2 [C1]41. [C2]Vasishṭha [C3]Pravachana [C4]Kāvanūr [C5]Maṇṭaśarman [C6]2 [C1]42. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Drōṇaśarman [C6]2 [C1]43. [C2]Gōtama [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Nimbaśarman [C6]2 [C1]44. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Agniśarman [C6]2 [C1]45. [C2]Do. [C3]Pravachana [C4]... [C5]Rudramaṇṭa [C6]2 [C1]46. [C2]Parāśara [C3]Pravachana [C4]... [C5]Gaṇamātaśarman [C6]2 [C1]47. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Mādhavaśarman [C6]2 [C1]48. [C2]Do. [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Nāgaśarman [C6]2 [C1]49. [C2]Harita [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Vināyakaśarman [C6]2 [C1]50. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Skanda [C6]2 [C1]51. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Koṇṭa [C6]2 [C1]52. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Dāmaśarman [C6]2 [C1]53. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Dēvaśarman [C6]2 [C1]54. [C2]Mudgala [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Channakāḷin [C6]2 [C1]55. [C2]... [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Drōṇa [C6]2 [C1]56. [C2]Kauśika [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Kumāramaṇṭa [C6]2 [C1]57. [C2]Do. [C3]Do. [C4]... [C5]Channakumāra [C6]2 [C1]58. [C2]Do. [C3]Pravachana [C4]... [C5]Tiṇṭadrōṇaśarman [C6]2 [C1]59. [C2]Do. [C3]Āpastambha [C4]... [C5]Kūḷaśarman [C6]1 [C1]60. [C2]... [C3]... [C4]OṟṟiyūrThis is Tiruvoṟṟiyūr near Madras; see p. 290, note 1. [C5]Kaṭukuchatti-PālapōchanThis is the Tamil spelling of the Sanskrit Bāla-Bhāja. [C6]1 [C1]61. [C2]... [C3]... [C4]UttarakākulaI.e., ‘the northern Kākula.’ This appears to refer to Chicacole in the Gañjām district, as distinguished from the more southern Śrīkākuḷam in the Kistna district. [C5]“To the author of the (above) eulogy (praśasti), Paramēśvara.” [C6]1 [C1]62. [C2]... [C3]... [C4]... [C5]“To the (village) physician.”With vaidya-bhāga compare maruttuva-pēṟu in No. 4, paragraph 3, and vaidya-vṛitti in Vol. I, p. 91. [C6]1 [C1]63. [C2]... [C3]... [C4]Gaṅgapura [C5]“To the devout worshipper of Mahēśvara, called Rēvati, who was the son of Drōṇaśrēshṭhiraṇa.” [C6]2 [C1]Total [C2]133

(V. 7.) As long as the sun moves in the sky, as long as the mountains stand, (and) as long as the moon and the stars (endure), so long let the race of Pūchān remain!

(V. 8.) The poet Paramēśvara, who was the son of the illustrious Chandradēva (and) was born from the race of Mēdhāvin, made the poetry of the (above) eulogy (praśasti).

B.—Tamil portion.

(L. 105.) In the twenty-sixth year (of the reign) of Madirai-koṇḍa Kō-Parakēsarivarman, we, (the members of) the assembly (sabhā) of Uda[ya]chandramaṅgalam, and we, (the members of) the assembly of Kāñchivāyil, alias Igaṉmaṟaimaṅgalam, (have agreed as follows):—

(L. 108.) We, (the inhabitants of) these two villages, having joined (and) having become one, shall prosper as one village from this (date).

Digital edition of SII 2.74 by converted to DHARMA conventions by Emmanuel Francis.

361-374 74