These two records engraved in early Grantha and Vaṭṭeḻuttu characters belong to Māṟañjaḍaiyaṉ who is also called Parāntaka. They are important because the Kali year 3871 is also quoted for this king, thus furnishing a valuable chronological land mark for early Pāṇḍya history. The rock-cut temple of Narasiṁha was begun by Māṟaṉ-Kāri alias Muvēndamaggalappēraraiyaṉ, a vaidya of Karavandapura alias Kaḷakkuḍi and an Uttaramantrin (minister) of the Pāṇḍya king,Ep. Ind., Vol. XVII, pp. 296 ff.alias Pāṇḍimaṅgala-Viśaiyaraiyaṉ who succeeded him in the office of minister, who added the mukhamaṇḍapa and had the consecration ceremony performed. As the person first mentioned had also the title Madhurakavi, it has been tentatively assumed that he had some connection with the Vaishṇava Āḻvār named Kāri Māṟaṉ alias Nammāḷvār, the author of the Tiruvāymoḻi. Karavandapuram has been identified with Ukkiraṉkōṭṭai in the Tirunelveli taluk of the district of the same name, in the inscriptions copied from which, the village is called Kaḷakkuḍi and Kaḷandai.Ibid., Vol. XXIII, p. 283 and n.
karavandapura nivāsī śrīmātvaidyaḥ śilā
gṛham viṣṇōḥ
dhūratarō mā
va matimānpāṇyasya parā
sya
magrahāramapi
tayēbdagōcarē
tyāmapi saijasaptatau
tiṣṭhō bhaga
ṣa pauṣṇēhani māsikārttikē
komāṟañcaṭaiyaṟku U
ttaramamantri kaḷakkuṭi vai
dyan mūventamaṅkalap
peraraiyaṉ Ākiya māṟaṅ
nīrsvarggāro
ha
ṉukku Anujan Uttara
mantrapada meytiṉa pāṇṭi
maṅkala vicaiaraiyaṉ
Ātiya māṟaṉṉei
ṉaṉ mukamaṇṭamañ ce
ytu nīrttaḷittāṉ
This and the other records published in the Epigraphia Indica are reproduced in this volume on account of their importance.
Published in Epigraphia Indica, Vol. VIII, pp. 317 ff.
Digital edition of SII 14.1 and SII 14.2 by