This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Ryosuke Furui.
The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no 809994).
Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.
Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the DHARMA_idListMembers_v01.xml file.
paṇḍita-ratnaśrīj
Success! Homage to the Buddha!
There was the son of king, the conqueror of the host of proud kings, of the illustrious Rāṣṭrakūṭa lineage, known to the three worlds as illustrious Nanna, the foremost among glorious ones, made known by his dutiful vow and commendable clean manner, and the wish-fulfilling tree among supplicants by his abundant donations.
He was known as the hero
He conquered the fort difficult to conquer and the strong king by his excellent valorous deeds and also by high, illustrious abode, sword, merit and wealth. Even now, the whiteness of the fort of Maṇipūra
Because of the preeminence of heroism resembling nobody else, he was known as Mahīśūdraka. He also took the praiseworthy name called Guṇāvaloka by his good manner. He was exalted by whatever virtuous names coming forth with this and that distinctions. He, dwelling in the sacred place, duly abandoned his body like a yogin at the end.
To him was the son, who defeated an enemy troop, heated the divisions of the quarters very much by his energy, greatly delighted a thicket of lotus that was a host of supplicants, and whose feet was rested on by the whole world, like the sun.
He grasped the essence in dharma, artha and kāma, his lotus-like feet were always pleased by the Fortune, he was the sole lion to the herd of elephants that was his enemy, and had a banner that was his fame known to the three worlds.
He was Yama in anger, the wish-fulfilling tree in favour, and attached to both practice and manner of branches of arts. He was the receptacle of unattainable courage and beauty, and had fame rising from numerous good varṇas.
The appearance of his beautiful form ashamed the Mind-born
To him is the son, who is the embodiment of merits raised by hundred virtuous actions, as if the Mind-born
He is the hot sun for lotuses that are the faces of loving women, the moon beam for the grove of night lotuses that are minds of sages. He is competent in recitation of scriptures, pursuing welfare, and known as Dharmāvaloka on the earth.
Seeing two forms of the lord of mountains
The ocean was defeated by him by unfathomability, a sage by endurance, the sun by radiance, the moon by loveliness, the master of animals
He, the one with purified fame, entirely furnishes the dharma, which is a treasure of wealth and destroyed of disturbance of Kali Age, with unequalled sayings which are loud, high and desirous of roads in the sky. He is doing an irreproachable service for ascetics every day with pure food and drinks, and with sweet meats purified by reverence, as if Bhava
By him, the one with tranquil mind, of
Of the risen sun destroying the darkness of delusion, of the only rain cloud calming dust of attachment, of sharp
Of the lord of animals
This perfumed chamber, which was like a beautiful row of steps of the sky, was caused to build high by him, who acquired essence and had the mind directed towards transience of the increase of wealth.
By him, who is familiar with touching by
Here the sage
In the reign of
Bhujjaṅga, the procurer, should be guided by panḍita Ratnaśrījañāna bhikṣu, born in Siṁhaladvīpa.
The word
Those stanzas describe the Buddha, whose perfumed chamber was established by Tuṅga, the donor, in genetive forms.
The king, in whose regnal year the present inscription is dated, could be Rājyapāla as conjectured by Dimitrov
My reading of the last line negates the claim of Dimitrov
First edited and published with facsimile by Rajendra Lal Mitra