siddham svasti bhimapūurāt bhagavataś carācara-guroḥ sa-kala-śaśāṅka-śekhara-dharasyāa sthityoutpati-pralaya-kāraṇa-hetu-śrī-ryamaliṅgeśvara-bhaṭṭārakasya caraṇa kamalārādhanāvyāpta-puṇya-nicayaḥ sva-śakti-sustraya-prakarṣ<sic>aair anurañjitāśeṣa-sāmanta-cakraḥ sva-bhuja-vbala-parākramākrānta-sakala-khiḍḍiraśṛṅga-maṇḍalarājye parapma-māheśvaro mātāpitṛ-pādānudhyātaḥ nala-vaṅśodbhavaḥ kula-kamalālaṅkāra-bhuūto mahārājādhirāja-parameśvara-śrī-bhīmasenadevaḥ kuśaliḥī kamaṇḍula pāṭṭae rvbrāṣṭrakuūṭa-vbṛhad-bhogi-bhogipramukhān yathā-nivāsino viṣaya-janapādāḥn sāamaādiśati cānyaTviditam astūu bhavatāḥm etad-viviṣaya-samvbaddha-kūurmatalā-grāmo 'yam. bhāaṭṭapājūneḥnaye napatidito 'smābhiḥ Agismāmi-śūsuta-Adityadevasya śsuta-bhāaṭṭa-pājūnaye kāṣaśyapa-gotrāyāvacchanupravara nodrūvavacchānuAnupravaraḥ mātā-pitror ātnyanmanaś ca puṇyābhirvṛddhaye viśṣva-saṅkrāntyāḥṁ ruūpya-palāni sapta 7 kacchikṛta salila-dhārā-purassa reṇa cantdrārkka-sthityā pratipādito 'smābhir yatatkālaḥs tat kālāntarenṇakauaiścid asmad-uparodhād dharmma-goauravāt na ccha vyādhā karaṇīyaā tathāca paṭhyate mānavīye utṁñ ca dharmmaśāstre

vbahubhir vvasudhā dattā rājabhis sagarādibhirḥ yasya yasya yadā bhuūmis tasāya tasya tadāphalaṁ sva-dattāṁ para-dattāṁ vā yo hared vasundharāṁ sa viṣṭhāyāṁ kr̥mir bhuūtvā pitr̥bhis sabhha pacyate. mā bhūd a-phala-śaṅkā vaḥ para-datteti pārthivāḥ sva-dānāt pāphalam ānantyaṁ para-dattānupālane saṣṭi-varṣa–sahasrāṇi rggasvargge modati bhūmidaḥ Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca tānaiy eva narakam vajetiḥret Iti kamala-dalāmvbu-vbindu-llolāṁ śriyaṁ Anucintya manuṣya-jīvitaṁ ca sakalam idam udāhrārīta vbuddhvā na hi puruṣaiḥ para-kiīrtayo vilopyā iti.

samvat 89 māgha-vadiduti sāsśanaṁ nivartitaḥṁ. tal likhitaṁ sāndhivigrahika-śrī-Arkadeveṇna Utkiīrṇṇañ ca sāmantākeṇna lāñchitaṁ ca vagulivaṇāsiṅghaṇa.

duti suggests reading dvitīyāyāṃ

Bibliographical references : Sircar EI34 1962 pp 233-38 Rajaguru OHRJ 6 (2-3) 1957 p97-102 ARIE 1959-1960 C62. 79417: "(Bhauma) year 159 on the second day of the dark half of the month of Māgha Acharya 2014 note 79 p. 417 "there is a great deal of controversy about the date opf the charter. Rajaguru deciphered it as samvat 189 of an unspecified era and opines that it was possibly referring to the Bhauma era. He fixed the date of the Bhauma era at CE 736 and calculated the date of the present grant as CE925. Sircar, on the other hand, believed that the date in question is samvat 89, which can be referred to Bhauma era. According to him the Bhauma era started in CE 831 and hence the date of the present grant is AD 919. However we have elesewhere pointed out that the date of the charter is samvat 159 of an unspecified era (Acharya, S.K. Numerals in Orissan inscriptions, SImla, 2002, p.132) and taken it as standing for the Bhauma era, the initial year of which has now been accepted by scholars as CE 736. We are therefore inclined to believe that the date of the present charter is CE 895."

Prose except the five customary stanzas ; introductory portion agrees with INSNalodbhava00002 ; the donnee had to pay the rent of 7 palas of silver apparently per annuum. The inscriptions thus records a karaśāsana

According to 235, this set is important beacuse it reveals the existence of a new king of a new dynasty in Orissa about the tenth century.

33207-208 1416-417