Nandamapūṇḍi grant of Rājarāja I Narendra Encoding Dániel Balogh intellectual authorship of edition Dániel Balogh DHARMA Berlin DHARMA_INSVengiCalukya00104

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.

Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Dániel Balogh.

2019-2025
DHARMAbase

Rare initial Ai occurs in line 7. The closer symbol in line 91 is a floret or sunburst comprised of a circle with a central dot and an unclear number of radiating lines at the perimeter. The closer symbol at the end is a floret comprised of a small central circle with four semicircular petals and an additional curlicue at the tip of each petal.

This is a traditional ornate script of the "early Telugu-Kannada" type used in all Eastern Cālukya copper plates of the 10th century and up to the time of Vimalāditya. The headmarks are small to medium serifs. After the binding hole in line 50 (on 3v), text written in this hand has been beaten out and hand 2 takes over. Original punctuation marks are vertical lines, usually with a serif and often slightly sinuous or bending left at the bottom. Anusvāra is a dot at headline height. Hand 1 forms dependent long ū with a standard u marker (complete with headmark at the end) plus a length mark identical to the standard ā marker, either an upright hook or a mark that starts horizontally to the right, then bends downward. Some instances of dependent ā bend back below the body like a subscript r. Rarely, dependent e attached at the bottom left of a character has an extension rising up vertically on the right of the body. An apparent combination of the two is a rare cursive alternative to dependent o, which starts out like the ornamental ā, then reverse to the right, so that the whole resembles a subscript y (two instances of ro in line 11, lo in line 19). This is an early Telugu script, with character bodies simpler, more cursive and less ornate than those of hand 1, and v-shaped headmerks. The hand is typical of the grants of Rājarāja I Narendra. Original punctuation marks are plain and straight vertical lines. Anusvāra is a dot at median height. Long and short dependent i are not clearly distinguished (exceptions include some instances of śrī) and have been read as correct in context. The distinction between dependent o and au is occasionally perceptible but inconsistent.

The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no 809994).

Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.

Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml file.

Initial encoding of the file
Seal śrī-tribhuvanāṁkuśa
Plates śrī-dhāmnaḥ puruṣottamasya mahato nārāyaṇasya prabhor nnābhī-paṁkaruhād babhūva jagatas sraṣṭā svayabhūs tataḥ jajñe mānasa-sūnur atrir iti yas tasmān muner atritas somo vaṁśa-karas sudhāṁsśur udita śrīkaṁṭha-cūḍāmaṇiḥ. tasmaād āsīt sudhā-sūter bbudho budha-nutas tataḥ. jātaḥ purūravā nāma cakravarttī sa-vikramaḥ.

tasmād āyur. Āyuṣo nahuṣaḥ. tato yayāti cakravarttī vaṁśa-karttā. tataḥ prācīśaḥ. praācīśāt sainyayāti. sainyayāter hayapatiḥ. rhayapates sārvvabhaumaḥ. sārvvabhaumāj jayasenaḥ. jayasenān mahābhaumaḥ. mahābhaumād aiśānaka. Aiśānakāt krodhānanaḥ. krodhānanād devakiḥ. devake ridevaker r̥cbhukaḥ. ricbhukād kṣakaḥ. rikṣakān mativaraḥ. satrāa-yoāga-yājī sarasvatī-nadī-nāthaḥ. tataḥ kārtyāyanaḥ.rtyāyanān nīlaḥ. nīlād duṣyantaḥ. tat-sutaḥ.

Āryyā. gaṁgā-yamunā-tīre yad avicchinnaṁ nikhāya yūpān kramaśaḥ. kr̥tvā tathāśvamedhān nāma mahā-karmma-bharata Iti yo labhata.

tato bharatād bhūmanyuḥ. bhūmanyos suhotraḥ. suhotrād dhastī. hastino virocanaḥ. virocanād ajamīlaḥ. Ajamīlāt saṁvaranaḥ. saṁvaraṇasya tapana-sutāyās tapatyāś ca sudhanvā. sudhanvanaḥ paraikṣiT. parikṣito bhīmasenaḥ. bhīmasenāt pradīpanaḥ. pradīpanāś cc chantanuḥ. śaṁtanor vvicitravīryyaḥ. vvicitravīryyāt pāṇḍu-rājapu.

putrās tasya ca dharmmaja-bhīmārjjuna-nakula-sahadevāḥ paṁcendriyavaT paṁca syur vviṣaya-grāhiṇas tatra. vr̥ttaM. yenādāhi vijitya khkhāṇḍavam atho gāṇḍīvinā vajriṇaṁ yuddhe pāśupatāstram aṁdhaka-ripoś cālābhi daityān bahūn indrārddhāsanam adhyarohi jayinā yat kālikeyādikān hatvā svairam akāri vaṁśa-vipina-ccchedaḥ kurūṇāṁ vibhoḥ.

tato rjjunād abhimanyuḥ. Abhimanyo parikṣiT. parikṣito janamejayaḥ. janamejayāt kṣemukaḥ. kṣemukān naravāhanaḥ. naravāhanāś cc chatānīkaḥ. śatānīkād udayanaḥ.

tataḥ paraṁ tat-prabhr̥tisv aviccchinna-santāneṣv ayodhyā-siṁghhāsanāsīneṣv ekānna-ṣaṣṭi-cakravarttiṣu gateṣu tad-vaṁśyo vijayādityo nāma rājā vijigīṣayā dakṣiṇāpathaṁ gatvā trilocana-pallavam adhikṣipya daiva-durīhayā lokāntaram agamaT

tasmin sakule purohitena sārddham antarvvattinītnī tasya mahādevī muḍivemu nāmāgrahāraṁ upagamya tad-vāstavyena viṣṇubhaṭṭa-somayājinā duhitti-nirvviśeṣam abhirakṣitā satī viṣṇuvarddhanan nāma prasūya. tasya ca kumārakasya mānavya-sagotra-hārīti-putra-dvipakṣa-gotra-kramocitāni karmaāṇi kārayitvā tam avarddhayaT. sa ca mātrā vidita-vr̥ttāntas san nirggatya calukya-girau nandāṁ bhagavatīṁ gaurīm ārādhya kumāra-nārāyaṇa-mātr̥-gaṇān saṁtttarppya śvetātapatraika-śaṁkha-paṁca-mahāśabda-pāli-ketana-pratiḍhakkā-varāha-lāṁcchana-piṁccha-kunta-siṁghhāsana-makara-toraṇa-kanaka-daṇḍa-gaṁgā-yamudīni sva-kula-kramāgatāni nikṣiptānīva tat-sāṁbmjya-cihnāni samādāya kaḍaṁba-gaṁgādi-bhūmipān nirjitya setu-narmmadā-madhyaṁ sārddha-sapta-lakṣāaṁ dakṣiṇāpathaṁ pālayām āsa.

śloka. tasyāsīd vijayādityo viṣṇuvarddhana-bhūpateḥ pallavānvaya-jātāyā mahādevyāś ca nandanaḥ

tat-sutaḥ polakeśi-vallabhaḥ. tat-putraḥ kīrttivarmmā. tasya tanayaḥ.

svasti. śrīmatāṁ sakala-bhuvana-saṁstūyamāna-mānavya-sagotrāṇāṁ hāriti-putrāṇāṁ kauśikī-vara-prasāda-labdha-rājyānāṁ mātr̥-gaṇa-paripālitānāṁ svaāmi-mahāsena-pādānudhyātānāṁ bhagavan-nārāyaṇa-prasāda-samāsādita-vara-varāha-lāṁcchanekṣaṇa-kṣaṇa-vaśīkr̥tārāti-maṇḍalānām aśvamedhāvabhr̥ttha-snāna-pavitrīkr̥ta-vapuṣāṁ cālukyānāṁ kulam alaṁkariṣṇos satyāśraya-vallabhendrasya bhrātā kubja-viṣṇuvarddhano ṣṭādaśa varṣāṇi veṅgī-deśam apālayaT. tad-ātmajo jayasiṁghha-vallabha trayastriṁśataṁ. tad-anujendrarājas sapta dināni. tat-suto viṣṇuvarddhano nava. tat-sūnur mmaṁgi-yuvarājaḥ paṁcaviṁśatiṁ. tat-putro jayasiṁghha-vallabhas trayodaśa. tad-avarajaḥ kokkīiliṣ ṣaṇ māsāN. tasyajyeṣṭho bhrātā viṣṇuvarddhanas tam uccāṭyas saptatriṁśataṁ. tat-putro vijayāditya-bhaṭṭaārako ṣṭaādaśa. tad-at-tanujo viṣṇuvarddhanaṣ ṣaṭtriṁśataṁ. tat-sūnur vvijayāditya-narendra-mr̥garājaś cāṣṭacatvāriṁśataṁ. tat-sutaḥ kali-viṣṇuvarddhano ddhyarddha-varṣaṁ. tat-suto guṇaga-vijayādityaś catuścatvāriṁśataṁ. tad-bhrātur vvikramāditya-bhūpates tanayaś cālukya-bhīmas triṁśataṁ. tat-sutaḥ kollebigaṇḍa-vijayādityaṣ ṣaṇ māsāN. tat-sūnur ammarājas sapta varṣaāṇi. tat-sutaṁ vijayādityaṁ bālam uccāṭya tāḍapo māsam ekaṁ. taṁ jitvā yudhi cālukya-bhīma-tanayo vikramāditya Ekādaśa māsāN. tat-tāḍapa-rāja-suto yuddhamallas sapta varṣāṇi.

taṁ yuddhamallaṁ parihr̥tya deśāt piṣṭvetareṣām api śātravānāM kṣmām ammarājānuja-rāja-bhīmo bhīmas samā dvādaśa rakṣati sma. tat-sūnur vvinatārātir ammarājo nr̥pāgraṇīḥ. paṁcaviṁśati varṣāṇi veṁgī-bhuvam apālayaT. dvaimāturo mma-nr̥pater ddāna-nr̥po rāja-bhīma-nr̥pa-tanayaḥ vidyā-kalāpa-caturaḥ. caturanta-dharām apāt samās tisraḥ. Anu dānārnnṇṇavād āsīd daiva-duśceṣṭayā tataḥ saptaviṁśati varṣāṇi veṁgī-mahir anāyia. Atrāntare dāna-narendra-sūnu śrī-śaktivarmmā sura-rāṭ-sadharmmaā yaś śauryya-śaktyā vinihatyaśatrūn sa dvādaśābdān samarakṣad urvvīṁ| tatas tad-anujo vīro vimalāditya-bhūpatiḥ mahī-maṇḍala-sāmrājya -prājya-lakṣmīṁ mudādadhāT| tejo yadīyam akhila-kṣitipāla-mauli -mālāsv abhād amala-ratna-ruci-cchalena pāti sma sapta sa samās sakalān dharitrīṁ bhīma-pratāpa-mahito birudaṁka-bhīmaḥ| tasmaād vimalādityād ravi-kula-lakṣmyāś ca kuṁdava-mahadeyyāḥkuṁdavā-devyāḥ nija-guṇa-vaśīkr̥tākhila-rājanyo rājarāja-vibhur a jani|| yas soma-vaṁśa-tilakaḥ śaka-vatsareṣu vedāṁburāśi-nidhi-varttiṣu siṁha-ge rkke| kr̥ṣṇa-dvitīya-divasottara-bhadrikāyāṁ vāre guror vvaṇiji lagna-vare bhiṣiktaḥ| Iṁdro yathā divam udaāra-yaśaās tāathorvvīṁ śauryyeṇa śaśvad akhilām abhirakṣituṁ yaḥ| śrī-viṣṇuvarddhana-nr̥po makuṭaṁ parārddhyaṁ rdhnādadhān maṇi-mayūkha-vibhāsitāśaṁ|| saṁrakṣati kṣiti-talaṁ kṣapitāri-vargge rggeṇa yena naya-śālini mānavena prītāḥ prajā nija-pavitra-caritra-toyaiḥ prakṣālayanti kali-kāla-kalaṁka-paṁka|| sannarggeṇa kulaṁ kalaāgama-parijñānena śuddhān dhiyaṁ dīnānātha-janārtthitārttha-nivaha-tyāgena lakṣmīṁ stthirāṁ saṁpūrṇṇāmala-caṁdrikā-viśadayārtyā jiagad-gītayā yo dik-cakram alaṁkaroti sutarāṁ cālukya-cūḍāmaṇi|| yasya sph(ā)ra-bhujā-kr̥pāṇa-dalitārātībha-kuṁbha-sthala -pronmuktāmala-vr̥tta-mauktika-cayas saṁgrāma-raṁgāṁtare dhatte vīra-rasa-kriyābhinayana-prastāvanā-lakṣitāṁ vīra-śrī-racitāṁjali-pravisarat-puṣpopahāra-śriya|| pitror vvaṁśa-gurū babhūvatur alaṁ yasya spphurat-tejasau sūryyā-candramasau nirasta-tamasau devau jagac-cakṣuṣī| daṁṣṭrā-koṭi-samuddhr̥tākhila-mahī-cakram mahaT krīḍayā viṣṇor ādi-varāha-rūpam abhavad yac-chāsā!ane lāṁchanaṁ||

sa sarvva-lokāśraya-śrī-viṣṇuvarddhana-mahārājādhirājo rāja-parameśvaraḥ parama-bhaṭṭārakaḥ|| parama-māheśvaraḥ parama-brahmaṇyaḥ śrī-rājarāja-devo reṇḍeṟulanaḍimi-viṣaya-nivāsino rāṣṭrakūṭa-pramukhāN kuṭuṁbinaḥ samaāhūya maṁtri-purohita-senāpati-hyuvarāja-dauvaārikapradhāna-samakṣam ittham ājñāpayati. yathā||

hārīta-gotre hari-mūrttir āpa staṁbhba-dvija-śreṣṭha-vibhur vvinītaḥ| sadā puroḍāśa-pavitra-vaktro vidvān abhūt kaṁcena-somayājī|| tasya śrīmāN himakara-kara-prasphurat-kīrtti-rāśer āsīt sūnuḥ sakala-viduṣāṁ aṁcitaḥ kaṁcenāryyaḥ| yaṁ manyaṁte yamam ari-gaṇāḥ kāma-dhenuṁ kavīṁdrāḥ krīḍārāmaṁ parama-suhr̥do vitaṁ baṁdhu-varggāḥ| tasyātmajo mahātmā samajani śaucāṁjaneya Iti viditaḥ prajñā-jita-vācaspatir akalaṁkāśaṁkanāmātyaḥ|| tasya ca su-dharmma-patnyā guṇa-śālinyāś ca sāmekāṁbāyā| Abha vad anuṣṭhita-jagad-upakaraṇo nārāyaṇas tanayaḥ| yaḥ saṁskr̥ta-karṇṇāṭa-prākr̥ta-paiśācikāṁdhra-bhāṣāsu| kavirājaśekhara Iti prathitaḥ sukavitva-vibhavena|| kavīn manīṣā-lava-durvvidagdhān manoharābhir nnija-sūktibhir yyaḥ| kurvvann agarvvān paṭubhir bibhartti kavībha-vajrāṁkuśa-nāma sārtthaṁ||

tasmai sakala-jagad-abhinuta-guṇa-śāline sarasvatī-karnnṇṇāvataṁsāyāṣṭādaśāvadhāraṇa-cakravarttine nanni-nārāyaṇāya bhavad-viṣaye nandamapūṇḍi nāma grāmo grahārīkr̥tya soma-grahaṇa-nimitte dhārā-pūrvvakam asmābhis sarvva-kara-parihāreṇa dattam iIti viditam astu va|

Asya sīmānaḥ. pūrvvataḥ Iyyūriyuṁ billemapeddapūṇḍiyuṁ bola-garusuna pallamuna koṇḍiya-guṁṭanaḍuma sīmā|| Āgneyataḥ Iyyūriyuṁ billemapeddapūṇḍiyu nerapulayuṁ bola-garusuna muyyali-kuṭra sīmā|| dakṣiṇataḥ Iyyūriyu nerapulayuṁ bola-garusuna tāḍla ṟeva sīmā| nairr̥tyataḥ Iyyūriyu nerapulayu muṁdaramunayuṁ bola-garusuna muyyali-kuṭra sīmā| paścimataḥ Iyyūriyu muṁdaramunayu maḍakuṟitiyuṁ bola-garusuna muyyali-kuṭra sīmā| vāyavyataḥ Iyyūriyu maḍakuṟitiyuṁ billemapeddapūṇḍiyuṁ bola-garusuna muyyali-kuṭruna golla-ṟeva sīmā| Uttarataḥ Iyyūriyuṁ billemapeddapuūṇḍiyuṁ bola-garusuna yoṟuva gaḍḍaya sīmā| Aiśānyataḥ Iyyūriyu billemapeddapūṇḍiyuṁ bola-garusauna maṟṟi-toḍi tāṭiyodda ciṁtaya sīmā||

Asyopari na kenacid bādhā karaṇīyā. yaḥ karoti sa paṁca-mahāpātaka-yukto bhavati. tathā coktaṁ bhagavatā vyāsena|

sva-dattāṁ para-dattāṁ vā yo hareta vasundharāṁ ṣaṣṭiṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi viṣṭhāyā(ṁ) jāyate krimiḥ| bahubhir vvasudhā dattā bahubhiś cānupālitā yasya yasya yadā bhūmis tasya tasya tadā phalam iti

Ājñaptir asya kaṭakādhairājaḥ. kāvyānāṁ karttā nanniya-bhaṭṭo. lekhako gaṇḍācāryyaḥ|| dvāttriṁśattame vija ya-rājya-varṣe varddhane kr̥tam idaṁ śāsana|

Seal
Plates sudhāṁsśur sudhāṁśur cakravarttī cakravarttī vaṁśa-karttā| As observed by Kielhorn, other versions of the legendary genealogy continue with tataḥ purur iti cakravarttī tato janamejayo śvamedha-tritayasya karttā before coming to Prācīśa. saṁvaranaḥ saṁvaraṇaḥ The inscribed character is not ṇa. It is probably na corrected from something else, likely sa. paraikṣiT parikṣiT -prabhr̥tisv -prabhr̥tiṣv siṁghhāsanāsīneṣv siṁhāsanāsīneṣv ekānna ekādna ekādona The corresponding locus has ekādna in the Korumelli grant of Rājarāja I Narendra. The present plate is somewhat damaged here, but nna is reasonably certain. -cakravarttiṣu -cakravarttiṣu agamaT The engraver may have started ma here, then rather clumsily corrected to ga. antarvvattinītnī antarvvattnī prasūya| K considers the punctuation mark superfluous. With the received text, the sentence must indeed continue after the absolutive, but other specimens of this story known to me all have a finite verb here (asūta, with the preceding words slightly different). Thus, a scribal error in the verb is also possible. nirjitya nirjitya The text may have been corrected from nijitya to vijitya. Parallel versions have nirjjitya. -lakṣāa -lakṣaṁ nava|| Parallel versions of the text add varṣāṇi after this word. The double punctuation mark may be a correction from an aborted character. -bhaṭṭaārako -bhaṭṭārako cāṣṭa° cāṣṭā° kollebigaṇḍa- kollabigaṇḍa- While I am not aware of this name ever being spelled with an e, the present instance is unambiguous and unlikely be a mistake, since it involves the ornate form of dependent e attached at bottom left but rising up on the right. birudaṁka- birudaāṁka- birudāṁka- kuṁdava-mahadeyyāḥkuṁdavā-devyāḥ birudaāṁka- kuṁdava-mahādeyyāḥkuṁdavā-devyāḥ I provisionally accept K's and RP's emendation. The name of Rājarāja's mother is Kuṁdavā in the Korumelli grant of Rājarāja I Narendra and Kuṁdāṁbikā in his Kalidiṇḍi grant. However, emending only to kuṁdavā-mahadevyāḥ or kuṁdava-mahādevyāḥ, while resulting in non-standard language, would yield correct prosody, changing the stanza to a vallarī. This gaṇa-based metre is rare, but does occur in earlier grants of the dynasty. tāathorvvīṁ tathorvvīṁ yena As K observes, the intent here was probably yatra (for yasmin), as in the very similar stanza 23 of the Korumelli grant. prītāḥ There is a loose headmark at the end of the line after this character. It may be a deliberate space filler, but more likely an aborted character that was instead engraved in the next line because of the tightness of space here. śuddhān kurvvan kurvvan rtyā jiagad- kīrtyā jagad- -racitāṁjali- -rahitāṁjali- babhūvatur alaṁ yasya These three characters are compressed and probably replace two originally inscribed characters. reṇḍeṟulanaḍimi- reṇḍeṟulunaḍimi- samaāhūya samaāhuūya samāhūya -hyuvarāja- -haiyuvarāja- -vibhur -vibhur sāmekāṁbāyā| sāmekāṁbāyāḥ sāmekāṁbāyāḥ| The visarga was added above and below the punctuation mark, partially obliterating it. sarvva-kara-parihāreṇa dattam iIti K notes that ka is a subsequent insertion. The space between rvva and ra would be much smaller if that had been the case. However, some or all of this entire sequence is probably a correction over a slightly shorter initially inscribed text. Below da, a subscript t presumably belonging to the (now) next tta can be made out, but there are no other obvious traces of correction apart from the crowdedness of this segment. muyyali-kuṭra muyyali-kuṭru RP silently normalises this word here and throughout this passage. yoṟuva yeṟuva Emendation to the previous editors' reading may be warranted, but the received reading is clear.
Seal
Plates

From the lotus in the navel of the great Lord Nārāyaṇa, the supreme person and the abode of Śrī, there arose Brahmā, the self-born creator of the world. From him was born a son of the mind called Atri, and from that sage Atri was born the founder of a dynasty: the Moon soma whose rays are nectar and who is the turban jewel of Śrīkaṇṭha Śiva.

From that nectar-yielding one there came into being Mercury budha, praised by the wise budha, and from him was born the valiant universal sovereign cakravartin named Purūravas.

From him was born Āyus. From Āyus, Nahuṣa. From him, the universal sovereign and dynastic father Yayāti.At this point, the names of Puru and Janamejaya were probably omitted. See the apparatus to line 5. From him, Prācīśa. From Prācīśa, Sainyayāti. From Sainyayāti, Hayapati. From Hayapati, Sārvabhauma. From Sārvabhauma, Jayasena. From Jayasena, Mahābhauma. From Mahābhauma, Aiśānaka. From Aiśānaka, Krodhānana. From Krodhānana, Devaki. From Devaki, R̥bhuka. From R̥bhuka, R̥kṣaka. From R̥kṣaka, Mativara, performer of a Sattra sacrifice and Lord of the River Sarasvatī. From him, Kātyāyana. From Kātyāyana, Nīla. From Nīla, Duṣyanta. His son was the one

What follows is moraic verse.

—who, because he unceasingly dug down one sacrificial post yūpa after another on the banks of the Gaṅgā and the Yamunā and also performed Aśvamedhas, obtained the name “Bharata of the Great Sacrifices.”

From that Bharata was born Bhūmanyu. From Bhūmanyu, Suhotra. From Suhotra, Hastin. From Hastin, Virocana. From Virocana, Ajamīla. From Ajamīla, Saṁvaraṇa. The son of Saṁvaraṇa and of Tapatī, the daughter of Tapana, was Sudhanvan. From Sudhanvan was born Parikṣit. From Parikṣit, Bhīmasena. From Bhīmasena, Pradīpana. From Pradīpana, Śantanu. From Śantanu, Vicitravīrya. From Vicitravīrya, King Pāṇḍu.

He in turn had five sons—Yudhiṣṭhira the son of Dharma, Bhīma, Arjuna, Nakula and Sahadeva—who were to obtain the kingdom viṣaya like the five senses which grasp the sense-objects viṣaya.

What follows is syllabic verse.

The masterful wielder of the Gāṇḍīva bow who, after vanquishing Indra the thunderbolt-bearer, burned the Khāṇḍava forest; who obtained the Pāśupata weapon in combat from Śiva the enemy of Andhaka; who, after slaying many Daityas such as Kālikeya, victoriously ascended to share a throne with Indra; who with abandon cut down the forest that was the dynasty of the Kurus—

—from that Arjuna was born Abhimanyu. From Abhimanyu, Parikṣit. From Parikṣit, Janamejaya. From Janamejaya, Kṣemuka. From Kṣemuka, Naravāhana. From Naravāhana, Śatānīka. From Śatānīka, Udayana.

Thereafter, when sixty-less-one universal sovereigns beginning with him Udayana had passed in uninterrupted succession, each seated on the throne of Ayodhyā, a king of their dynasty named Vijayāditya marched to Dakṣiṇāpatha driven by a desire to conquer. He challenged Trilocana Pallava and, by an ill turn of fate, passed to the otherworld.

In the midst of that tribulation, his pregnant chief queen went with their chaplain purohita to a Brahmanical settlement agrahāra named Muḍivemu under the protection of its resident the soma-sacrificer Viṣṇubhaṭṭa, who cherished her as if she were his own daughter. Having there gave birth to a son named Viṣṇuvardhana, she raised that boychild, arranging for the performance of the ceremonies traditionally applicable to his bilateral gotra, namely being of the Mānavya gotra and a son of Hāriti, and so on. He in turn, when her mother had told him the story, went forth to Mount Calukya and worshipped Nandā, who is the goddess Gaurī, and also appeased Kumāra, Nārāyaṇa and the band of Mothers. Having thereby recovered the hereditary paraphernalia of sovereignty belonging to his family, as though they had been deposited with these deities for safekeepingnamely, the white parasol, the one conch shell, the five great soundsThe expression pañca-mahāśabda probably refers to being honoured by the sound of five musical instruments, but may also mean five titles beginning with “great”. See 296-2989 for a discussion., the pennant garland pāli-ketana, the inverted drum pratiḍhakkāSome Cālukya grants use the words paḍa-ḍhakkā and daḍakkā in similar contexts. See the Ceruvu Mādhavaram plates of Kali Viṣṇuvardhana V and the commentary thereto., the Boar emblem, the peacock fan piṁcha, the lance kunta, the lion throne, the makara archway, the golden sceptre, the Gaṅgā and Yamunā and so forth—and having conquered the kings of the Kaḍambas, Gaṅgas and so on, he reigned over Dakṣiṇāpatha extending from Rāma’s bridge to the Narmadā and comprising seven and a half lakhs of villages.

What follows is a śloka.

The son of that King Viṣṇuvardhana and his chief queen born of the Pallava dynasty was Vijayāditya.

His son was Polakeśi Vallabha. His son was Kīrtivarman. His son—

Greetings. Satyāśraya Vallabhendra Pulakeśin II was eager to adorn the lineage of the majestic Calukyas—who are of the Mānavya gotra which is praised by the entire world, who are sons of Hāriti, who attained kingship by the grace of Kauśikī’s boon, who are protected by the band of Mothers, who were deliberately appointed to kingship by Lord Mahāsena, to whom enemy territories instantaneously submit at the mere sight of the superior Boar emblem they have acquired by the grace of the divine Nārāyaṇa, and whose bodies have been hallowed through washing in the purificatory ablutions avabhr̥tha of the Aśvamedha sacrifice. His brother Kubja Viṣṇuvardhana protected pāl- the country of Veṅgī for eighteen years. His son Jayasiṁha Vallabha I, for thirty-three. His younger brother Indrarāja Indra Bhaṭṭāraka, for seven days. His son Viṣṇuvardhana II, for nine years. His son Maṅgi Yuvarāja, for twenty-five. His son Jayasiṁha Vallabha II, for thirteen. His brother of inferior birth, Kokkili, for six months. After dethroning him, his eldest brother Viṣṇuvardhana III, for thirty-seven years. His son Vijayāditya I Bhaṭṭāraka, for eighteen. His son Viṣṇuvardhana IV, for thirty-six. His son Vijayāditya II Narendramr̥garāja, for eight and forty. His son Kali-Viṣṇuvardhana V, for a year and a half. His son Guṇaga Vijayāditya III, for forty-four. The son of his younger brother King bhūpati Vikramāditya, Cālukya-Bhīma, for thirty. His son Kollebigaṇḍa Vijayāditya IV, for six months. His son Ammarāja I, for seven years. After dethroning his son the child Vijayāditya V, Tāḍapa, for one month. After defeating him, Cālukya-Bhīma’s son Vikramāditya II, for eleven months. Then that King rājan Tāḷapa’s son Yuddhamalla, for seven years.

Having ousted that Yuddhamalla from the country and having also quashed other enemies, the fearsome King Bhīma II, younger brother of Ammarāja, protected rakṣ- the earth for twelve years.

His son Ammarāja II, the foremost of kings who forced his enemies into submission, protected pāl- the land of Veṅgī for twenty-five years.

King Dāna Dānārṇava, the brother of King Amma II by a different mother and the son of King Bhīma II, clever in a whole array of sciences, protected pā- the earth up to its four ends for three years.

Then, after Dānārṇava, by an ill turn of fate the land of Veṅgī remained leaderless for twenty-seven years.

At this juncture, the son of King Dāna, His Majesty Śaktivarman, who was of the same nature as Indra the king of the gods, struck down his enemies by the power of his valour and protected rakṣ- the earth for twelve years.

Thereafter his son, the valiant King bhūpati Vimalāditya, joyfully accepted the great majesty lakṣmī of emperorhood over the circle of the earth.

That Birudaṅka Bhīma, celebrated for his terrifying bhīma valour, whose glory shone as if it were a flawless gem over the garlands atop the heads of every king, protected pā- the entire earth for seven years.

Of that Vimalāditya and of Queen Kundavā, the royal goddess lakṣmī of the Solar family, was born the sovereign Rājarāja, who overpowered all rulers rājanya by his innate qualities.

He, the ornament of the Lunar dynasty, was anointed to protect the earth when the Śaka years were positioned as the Vedas 4, oceans 4 and treasures 9 i.e. Śaka 944, when the Sun was in Leo siṁha, in the Uttara-Bhadrikā lunar asterism on the dark kr̥ṣṇa fortnight’s second day, on Thursday, under the excellent ascendant of Libra vaṇij.

He, His Majesty King nr̥pa Viṣṇuvardhana of eminent glory, took upon his head the distinguished crown whose jewels illuminate the directions with their rays in order to protect abhi-rakṣ forever the entire earth with his valour, just as Indra of eminent glory did the same to protect the firmament.

While heSee the apparatus to line 57 for an emendation to facilitate interpreting the text as translated. who has annihilated the host of enemies protects the earth in the lawful manner of i.e. prescribed by Manu, his delighted subjects wash off the mud that is the stain of the Kali age with the waters of his innately holy behaviour.

He, the crest jewel of the Cālukyas, ornaments to perfection his high birth through his just ways, his pure intellect through his expertise in arts and lore, his stable affluence through his abandonment of masses of wealth begged by droves of the destitute and the helpless, and the wheel of the directions with his world-renowned fame bright like the disc of a spotless full moon.

The scatter of immaculate round pearls released in the confines of the stage of battle from the surface of the forehead globes of his enemies’ elephants struck down by the sword in his robust arm resembles the exquisiteness of an offering of flowers spilling from the cupped hands añjali of the goddess of heroes beheld in the prologue prastāvanā to the performance abhinayana of a play kriyā in the heroic sentiment vīra-rasa.

The founders of his parents’ dynasties were verily the Sun and the Moon: the two Eyes of the World, the gods who dispel darkness with their scintillating brilliance. The emblem of his reign became the Original Boar form of Viṣṇu, which could playfully lift the great circle of the entire earth on the tip of its tusk.

That shelter of all the world sarva-lokāśraya, the Supreme Lord parameśvara and Emperor mahārājādhirāja, Supreme Sovereign parama-bhaṭṭāraka, supreme devotee of Maheśvara, His Majesty Viṣṇuvardhana who is King Rājarāja, convokes all householders kuṭumbin—including foremost the territorial overseers rāṣṭrakūṭa—who reside in Reṇḍeṟulanaḍimi district viṣaya and, witnessed by those officials headed by the minister mantrin, the chaplain purohita, the general senāpati, the crown prince yuvarāja and the gate guard dauvārika, commands them as follows. To wit:

In the Hārīta gotra there was one foremost among the most excellent Brahmins of the Āpastamba sūtra: the learned Soma sacrificer Kaṁcena who resembled Hari Viṣṇu and whose mouth was ever purified by oblation prayers puroḍāśa.

He whose halo of fame glimmered like the rays of the cool-rayed moon had a majestic son revered by all the wise: Kaṁcenārya, whom enemy hosts perceived as Yama, premier poets as a cow of plenty kāmadhenu, his best friends as a park of pleasures, and the flocks of his relatives as their very life.

A great-souled son known as Śaucāñjaneya was born to him: a minister without stain and suspicion who surpassed the Lord of Speech Brahmā in intellect.

Of him and his good wedded wife the virtuous Sāmekāmbā was born a son, Nārāyaṇa, who endeavoured to benefit the world.

He is renowned as Kavirājaśekhara ‘diadem of the king of poets’ thanks to his talent of excellence in poetry in the Sanskrit, Karṇāṭa, Prakrit, Paiśācika and Andhra languages.

With his delightful and cunning compositions he curbs the pride of poets who are mere sophists with a shred of inspiration, thus bearing with justification the name Kavībha-vajrāṅkuśa ‘diamond goad to the elephants among poets’.

To that Nanni-Nārāyaṇa endowed with qualities lauded by the entire world, an ear ornament for Sarasvatī, a universal emperor of the eighteen determinations aṣṭādaśāvadhāraṇa,Cielas 153 suggests that /avadhāraṇa/, a term that baffled Kielhorn in this context, may be an alternative term for /avadhāna/, which in later texts also appears in the form of the compound /avadhāna-cakravartin/ and may be connected to a number, typically eight. In this specialised sense, /avadhāna/ (translated ‘attentiveness’ by Cielas) refers to a complex set of skills related to performance in a learned assembly. we have on the occasion of an eclipse of the moon given the village named Nandamapūṇḍi in your district, converted into a rent-free holding agrahāra, accompanied by pouring a stream of water, with a remission of all taxes. Let this be known to you.

Its borders are as follows.Throughout the description of the boundaries, I rely in Kielhorn’s interpretation of the Telugu phrases. To the east, the border is in the middle of the Koṇḍiya tank guṇṭa in a depression at the border of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement and Billemapeddapūṇḍi. To the southeast, the border is the triple junction muyyali-kuṭra of the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement, Billemapeddapūṇḍi and Nerapula. To the south, the border is a ṟēva tree surrounded by palmyra treesAs an alternative to Kielhorn’s translation, might ṟēva, here and on the northwest, mean a river landing? at the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement and Nerapula. To the southwest, the border is the triple junction muyyali-kuṭra of the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement, Nerapula and Mundaramuna. To the west, the border is the triple junction muyyali-kuṭra of the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement, Mundaramuna and Maḍakuṟiti. To the northwest, the border is the ṟeva tree of the shepherds at the triple junction muyyali-kuṭra of the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement, Maḍakuṟiti and Billemapeddapūṇḍi. To the north, the border is the bank of a riverThis translation presupposes emendation to the reading shown by the previous editors, see the apparatus to line 87. at the triple junction muyyali-kuṭra of the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement and Billemapeddapūṇḍi. To the northeast, the border is a tamarind tree near a palmyra tree with a banyan tree at the triple junction muyyali-kuṭra of the borders of the fields bola-garusu of this settlement and Billemapeddapūṇḍi.

Let no-one pose an obstacle to their enjoyment of rights over it. He who does so shall be conjoined with the five great sins. So too has the reverend Vyāsa said:

He who would seize land, whether given by himself or by another, shall be born as a worm in faeces for sixty thousand years.

Many kings have granted land, and many have preserved it as formerly granted. Whosoever at any time owns the land, the fruit reward accrued of granting it belongs to him at that time.

The executor of this grant is the castellan kaṭakādhirāja. The author of the poems is Nanniya Bhaṭṭa. The writer lekhaka is Gaṇḍācārya. This decree was made in the course of the thirty-second year of the victorious reign.

Kielhorn compares the praśasti of this grant to that of Korumelli grant of Rājarāja I Narendra. In fact, up to stanza 11 it more closely parallels (almost word for word) the Raṇastipūṇḍi grant of Vimalāditya, not yet discovered when Kielhorn edited the present plates. The fact that the earlier text has been erased from a point just before Vimalāditya succeeds Śaktivarman (after which a later hand takes over, see the hand description), also indicates that the original text was inscribed under Vimalāditya. I assume that a detailed eulogy of that king, as in the Raṇastipūṇḍi grant, would have been engraved here and replaced with a shorter one for the purposes of Rājarāja’s grant. From stanza 12 onward, the verses are comparable to those in the Korumelli grant.

Kielhorn suggests that the grant, or at least the eclipse that occasioned it, took place on 22 November 1053 CE.

Edited by F. Kielhorn () from inked impressions supplied by Hultzsch, with a partial translation, without facsimiles.Kielhorn reports Hultzsch mentioning that the height of the rims prevented the taking of good impressions. Also edited in Telugu by Jayanti Ramayya Pantulu (), with estampages of the plates and photograph of the seal. The latter editor clearly took the former's edition as the starting point, preserving some of its inaccuracies stemming from Kielhorn's poor facsimiles, but improving some of them. The present edition by Dániel Balogh is based on photographs of the original taken by myself in February 2023 at the Government Museum, Chennai, collated with the two editions and Ramayya Pantulu's estampages.