West and East doorjambs of South false door of the North tower of Preah Ko (K. 319), 801 Śaka EpiDoc Encoding Salomé Pichon intellectual authorship of edition Saveros Pou Salomé Pichon DHARMA Siem Reap DHARMA_INSCIK00319

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.

Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Salomé Pichon.

2019-2025
DHARMAbase

The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no 809994).

Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.

Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the DHARMA_idListMembers_v01.xml file.

Initial encoding of the inscription

sruk· prajal· mu cpoṅ· Ikaṁ kaṁpur· I sī laAu I tai caṁrip· I tai kan·As· I tai pau ka vaḥ I tai kanhī I tai kmau I lap· kandep· I tai yar· I tai ta I tai vrau I gvāl· caṁlau I tai kmau sot· I sī pau kanteṅ· I tai kaI lap· kan·sū I lap· prāṇa I sī pau caṁdak· I sī rat kmañ· I piṇda mu I5 gvāl I tai 10 lap· III sī rat· I sī pau II tai pau I savāla 20 4. piṇda dalmak· nu cmāṁ kloṅṅa pleya jnval· I mu 10 I40 8 gvāl· 10 III tai 80 10 9 lap 10 sī rat· 7 tai rat· 7 sī pau 8 tai pau 7 savāla 200 10 I

lla ha pi nu dalmakka nu kamrateṅ· Añ· miśra I drā tai ye subhega dai I kvanna jmol· I ye varmmapura I kvanna jmol· I I ye I kvanna jmol· II ye I ye laṁneṅ I kvanna ye I ye vr̥ I kvanna ye I ye jalarāśa I kvanna ye II ye muliḥ I kvanna jmoI ye cauva jmol· I ye kñuṁ I kvanna ye I ye caṁlau I kvanna jmol· ye I ye panlas· I kvanna jmol· II ye I cauva jmol· I ye kan·sū I kvanna ye I cauva ye I ye kandhar· saṁloṅ· I kvanna ye I cauva ye I kvanna ye I cauva jmol II ye vajrāṅgī I kvanna ye II cauva jmo I kvanna jmol· I ye III cauva jmol· I ye jayamatī I I kvanna ye I ye kadyañ I kvanna ye II ye mahī I kva I ye suhavatī I kvanna ye III ye vaOk· I kvanna jmol· kvanna ye II ye kmau ratna I kvanna jmol· I ye I ye kuṅ· ye I ye apa I kvanna jmol· I ye II ye varadhīśa I I ye gapan· I kvanna jmol· I ye vrai I kvanna jmol· I ttal· jmol· I piṇda ye 20 8 kvanna jmol· 20 6 savāla 80 10 9. sruk· travāṅ· U mu dai I sī cke I sī taṅkū I sī kanduḥ I I sī ka I sī śrīyavāsa I sī saṁUy· I I An·qvan· I sī kr̥ṣṇabhāva I sī daṁluḥ I I tai tan· I tai cpoṅ· I tai kaṁvai I tai kan· I tai kaṁvyal· I tai vraḥ qme I tai kaṁ I tai pratādeva I tai śrīyādeva I hasa I. mu kanteṅ· I sī kañcū I sī cke I I tai kampar· I tai tgun· I tai panheṁ I ṅ· I . mu su rāja I sī cke I I sī kanl Ivikhātā II gvāl· tgap· I tai āda I sī tkal· I tai pau I tai sāI tai pau I tai rat· kaṁ piṇda mu III20 II gvāl· 4 savala 60 8. sruk· l· śrī I tai I tai kansuc· I tai kyāk· I I tai II mu nraI I

Ikaṁ tai kan·As· I tai pau ka kanhī kansiyā yar· I tai ta I kmañ· I pi kañ 20 4 20 5 40 8 20 8 80 10 9 60 10 9 7 9 This correction applies to the three 7. 200 10 I 100 lla ha pi nu dalmakka nu dalmak S. Pou didn't mark a gap here, just stopped the edition of this line after dalmak. kamrateṅ· Añ· miśra I mi drā tai drāṇī subhega subheda kvanna jmol· I ye I ye I kvanna jmol· II ye I ye laṁneṅ I I kvanna ye I ye jalarāśa I I ye cauva jmol· I ye I I cauva 2 cov kvanna ye I cauva ye I saṁloṅ· saṁroṅ cauva cov nna ye I cauva jmol II cauva cov I cauva cov I kvanna ye I ye kadyañ I ye suhavatī I vaOk· vaUk kvanna ye II ye kmau ratna I ye I ye apa I I ye gapan· I vrai vai ttal· jmol· I savāla 80 10 9 60 10 9 mu dai tai I sī ka I śrīyavāsa I śrī I An·qvan· I I tai tan· I I tai kaṁvyal· I I tai pratādeva I hasa I. mu kanteṅ· I I tai kampar· I tai tgun· I panheṁ pansoṁ ṅ· I surāja rāja I sī kanl Ivikhātā II tai āda I sī tkal· I sāI tai pau I piṇda mu III20 II gvāl· 4 S. Pou marks this lign as completely illegible. savala 60 8

From here onwards, S. Pou considers the inscription as illegible. She evaluated 6 lines lost 33-39. Claude Jacques evaluated at least 50 lines in total for this doorjamb. Compared to Pou, I evaluate around 13 more lost lines, bringing the total to 53.

First edited by Saveros Pou (53-54). Re-edited here by Salomé Pichon based on EFEO estampage n. 1249 and on a reading on stone done in May 2022.

53-54