--- name: technical-docs description: Write and review technical documentation for Sentry SDK docs. Use when creating, editing, or reviewing documentation pages, especially MDX files in docs/platforms/. --- # Technical Documentation Writing ## Core Principles ### 1. Lead with "Why", Then "How" Every section must answer: **Why would a developer need this?** Bad: ``` ## Server Actions Use `captureException` in Server Actions to report errors. ``` Good: ``` ## Server Actions Server Actions that return error states to the client catch errors before Sentry sees them. Report these manually so you don't lose visibility. ``` ### 2. Structure by User Intent, Not API Surface Organize around what developers are trying to do, not around API methods. Bad structure (API-centric): - captureException - captureMessage - withScope Good structure (intent-centric): - Errors that need manual capture (and why) - Adding context to errors - Troubleshooting missing errors ### 3. Avoid Redundant Examples If the same pattern appears in multiple sections, consolidate it. **Ask yourself:** "Am I showing the same code pattern again? If yes, reference the earlier example instead." Bad: ``` ## Error Boundaries Sentry.captureException(error); ## Server Actions Sentry.captureException(error); ## API Routes Sentry.captureException(error); ``` Good: ``` ## Where Manual Capture is Needed These Next.js patterns catch errors before Sentry sees them: - Error boundaries (error.tsx files) - Server Actions returning error states - API routes with custom error responses [Single example with explanation of the pattern] ``` ### 4. Be Precise About When/Why Don't just show code. Explain the specific condition that requires this approach. Bad: ``` Add captureException to report these errors. ``` Good: ``` Next.js error boundaries intercept errors before they bubble up to Sentry's global handler. Without manual capture here, these errors silently disappear from your Sentry dashboard. ``` ### 5. Concise for Humans, Complete for Context Write clearly and concisely. Long pages with repeated patterns lose readers. - Keep explanatory text short and direct - One code example per concept (not per location) - Use TL;DR summaries for long sections - Prefer bullet points over prose for lists ### 6. Best Practices as Guidance, Not Repetition Best practices should add new information, not repeat earlier examples. Bad best practice: ``` ## Best Practices ### Use captureException in Error Boundaries [same code shown earlier] ``` Good best practice: ``` ## Quick Reference - Error boundaries: Required for visibility (errors intercepted by Next.js) - Server errors: Automatic unless you return custom responses - Client errors: Automatic for unhandled exceptions ``` ## Sentry Docs Specific Patterns ### SplitLayout Usage Use `` for side-by-side text/code when: - The code directly illustrates the text - Both are needed to understand the concept Don't use when: - Showing a directory structure (use plain code block) - The text is just "here's an example" (just show the code) ### PlatformLink Usage Link to related docs rather than repeating content: ``` For automatic tracing, see API Reference. ``` ### Code Block Filenames Always include filename when showing file-specific code: ```tsx {filename:app/error.tsx} ``` ## Review Checklist When reviewing documentation: - [ ] Does each section explain WHY before HOW? - [ ] Is the same code pattern shown multiple times? (consolidate if yes) - [ ] Would a developer know WHEN to use this approach? - [ ] Can any section be shortened without losing meaning? - [ ] Are best practices adding new info or just repeating?