Erica Andreose
Curse Of Knowledge ontology bias
Ontology for Curse of Knowledge bias
has participant
is participant in
The relation between something and its Topic (subject, argument, domain, theme, subject area, etc.). It can be used widely to talk about document annotations, subject directories, etc. hasTopic is very general. For example, consider the following cases: (1) A biography of Brigitte Bardot hasTopic 'star system' (2) The concept of 'starlet' hasTopic 'cinema' (3) A biography of Claude Chabrol hasTopic 'Nouvelle Vague'.
ha argomento
has topic
is topic of
è argomento di
assumesKnowledge
hasExpertise
hasNoExpertise
hasOutcome
percieveKnowledge
An agent (eg. person, group, software or physical artifact).
Outcome affected by the bias Curse of Knowledge
BiasedOutcome
Outcome not effected by the Curse of Knowledge bias
NonBiasedOutcome
Agent (foaf:Agent) effected by the bias Curse of Knowledge
BiasedAgent
CognitiveBias
Cognitive bias that occurs when an individual, who is communicating with others, assumes that others have information that is only available to themselves, assuming they all share a background and understanding.
CurseOfKnowledge
Agent (foaf:Agent) not effected by the bias
NonBiasedAgent
Any physical, social, or mental process, event, or state.
Event
A topic, or subject, argument, domain, theme, subject area, etc. Topics have a controversial intuition across common sense, document management systems, knowledge organization systems, etc. There is an interesting duality of topics: they are commonly interpreted as areas of shared knowledge within a Community (therefore as collections of social objects). On the other hand, existing directories and thesauri use 'topic' (or 'subject') more restrictively, as a relation between a document and a concept. For example, thesauri do not usually distinguish when their 'concepts' (cf. skos:Concept) are actually intended as concepts (in the sense of Concept in this pattern) and when they are intended as topics. The distinction is clear when you compare these two sample sentences: 'the football topic is part of the sport topic' vs. 'the concept of football is part of the concept of sport'. While the first is perfectly acceptable, the second is counterintuitive and even possibly wrong. This effect is due to the fact that concepts are 'intensional' notions and are not intended as areas of knowledge, document spaces, etc., which are 'extensional' notions. Accordingly to these basic observations, in this pattern Concept and Topic result to be disjoint, and an appropriate representation should be in place in order to model thesauri. E.g. skos:Concept should be mapped to the union of Concept and Topic.
Argomento
Topic