# Complete deterministic demo run

This transcript is produced by the same `CouncilStateMachine`, Zod schemas, and
aggregator exercised in `tests/state-machine.test.ts`. The seats are deterministic
test doubles so the protocol can be demonstrated without provider credentials.

## Input

- Question: Should the service use strategy A or strategy B?
- Style: balanced
- Anonymous mapping for this run: GPT → P2, GLM → P3, DeepSeek → P1

## Round 1 — blind independent positions

All three seats receive the same prompt and none receives another seat's answer.

| Seat | Thesis / recommendation | Confidence |
|---|---|---:|
| GPT | Choose A | 70 |
| GLM | Choose B | 70 |
| DeepSeek | Choose A | 70 |

Each position also returns the validated fields `reasoning`, `assumptions`,
`risks`, and `evidence_needed`. In this fixture those are, respectively,
`Reason for <choice>`, `Stable requirements`, `Execution risk`, and `A benchmark`.

## Round 2 — anonymous cross-critique

The positions are redistributed only as P1, P2, and P3. These participant labels
are separate from the strategy A/B names in the question.
Provider and model identity terms are scrubbed before redistribution.

| Reviewing seat | Preferred anonymous position | Critique | Confidence |
|---|---:|---|---:|
| GPT | P1 | Clear objective; limited evidence; benchmark data is missing | 72 |
| GLM | P2 | Clear objective; limited evidence; benchmark data is missing | 72 |
| DeepSeek | P1 | Clear objective; limited evidence; benchmark data is missing | 72 |

## Round 3 — final revision

| Seat | Final vote | Final recommendation | Changed mind | Confidence |
|---|---:|---|---:|---:|
| GPT | P1 | Choose A | no | 78 |
| GLM | P2 | Choose B | no | 78 |
| DeepSeek | P1 | Choose A | no | 78 |

All seats agree that outcomes should be measured. Their remaining disagreement is
the implementation order. No critical-risk flag is active.

## Deterministic verdict

- Valid: yes
- Result: majority
- Quorum: 3/3
- Vote distribution: P1 = 2, P2 = 1
- Recommendation: Choose A
- Consensus: Measure outcomes
- Minority view: GLM — Choose B
- Evidence still needed: A benchmark
- Changed-mind count: 0
- Critical review required: no

The test suite separately verifies unanimous, split, degraded 2/3, failed 0–1/3,
hybrid, and matching critical-risk-category outcomes.