Digitized copy served by HathiTrust and originating from Harvard University.
Potter's English wording, long-s typography, page breaks, speeches, lyric divisions, and notes are preserved. English verse units receive sequential CTS citations. Translation groups point explicitly to passages of the Smyth/Perseus Greek edition; individual English lines are not assigned unsupported one-to-one alignments. Catchwords are encoded as fw and explanatory notes as EpiDoc apparatus entries.
This pointer pattern extracts an English verse unit.
CTS edition: urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0085.tlg002.potter1779-eng2.
No repreſentation can be conceived more
agreeable to a brave and free people,
than that which ſets before their eyes the
ruin of an invading tyrant defeated by their
own valour; and no poet could ever claim
the right of making ſuch repreſentation
with ſo good a grace as Æſchylus, who
had borne a diſtinguiſhed part in the real
Then ſhining heav'nly fair, a Goddeſs arm'd.
Beſides this wonderful management of the
parts, the poet has the delicacy to ſet the
glory of his countrymen in the brighteſt
view, by putting their praiſes into the
mouths of their enemies. Not ſatisfied with
a ſpirited narration of their defeat, and a
recital
of the many royal chiefs that periſhed in that battle; not ſatisfied with ſpreading the terror through all the realms of Perſia, and placing them in a manner before our eyes in all the diſtreſs of deſolation and deſpair, he hath intereſted even the dead, and, with the aweful ſolemnity of a religious incantation, evoked the ghoſt of Darius to teſtify to his Perſians that no ſafety, no hope remained to them, if they continued their hoſtile attempts againſt Greece; ſo that his ſublime conception hath engaged Earth and Sea, Heaven and Hell, to bear honourable teſtimony to the glory of his countrymen, and the ſuperiority of their arms.
This tragedy was exhibited eight years after the defeat at Salamis, whilſt the memory of each circumſtance was yet recent; ſo that we may conſider the narration as a faithful hiſtory of this great event. The war was not yet ended, though the Perſian monarch had offered to make the moſt humiliating conceſſions, and the Athenians were inclined to accept them; but Themiſtocles oppoſed the peace. So that we are further to conſider this play in a political light; the poet, by ſo animated a deſcription of the pernicious effects of an obſtinate pride, and by filling the ſpectators with a malignant compaſſion for the vaniſhed Xerxes, indirectly undiſpoſing his countrymen to a continuation of the war. Thus every thing at Athens, even their ſhows, had a reſpect to the public good. This is the fine remark of P. Brumoy.
The ſcene of this tragedy is at Suſa, before the ancient ſtructure appropriated to the great council of ſtate, and near the tomb of Darius.
To expiate the ill-omened viſion of the night: hence
Noctem flumine purgas.
STANLEY.
The translation follows the correction of Pauw: Mr. Heath retains the common reading, and renders the paſſage thus, "If my ſon conquers, he will be glorious; but if he be con- quered, he is not accountable to the ſtate, but will rule the kingdom as usual." The ſpirit of Æschylus is not thus tame. 'That Atoſsa feared a revolt in the ſtate, appears by her in- treating the Chorus, the great council of Persia, to comfort her son at his return, and attend him to his house, Μὴ καὶ τι πρὸς κακῶισι πρόσθηται κακὸν ; and by declaring, that she will not forsake in their afflictions those whom the holds most dear,
Οὐ γὰρ τὰ φίλτατ᾽ ἐν κακοῖς προδώσομεν.
And that the Chorus had the same apprehensions is evident from the latter part of the next ode.
Atoſſa with great delicacy inquires in general,
What fceptred chief Dying hath left his troops without a lord?
Though her particular anxiety was for her son: thus the meſ- ſenger understands her; and, having aſſured her of the ſafety of Xerxes, proceeds without further queſtion to inform her what ſceptred chiefs had periſhed. Mr. Heath destroys this propriety, and the whole sense of the context, by, the idea which he has affixed to the words ἄνανδρον τάξιν, and for which he has no warrant from Æschylus: would he carry the ſame idea to the ἔυνιδας ἀνάνδρες of v. 289?
Pſyttaleia, a rough uncultivated rock between Salamis and the continent. Pan is always repreſented as delighting in ſuch places,
Καὶ κορυφὰς ὀρέων, καὶ πετρήεντα κάρηνα.
-STANLEY.
The Perſians endeavoured to preſerve the virgin purity of water with the moſt religious attention, eſteeming that and fire, in this pure ſtate, to be the only images of the divine nature in this world: with this view guards were aſſigned to the fountains and rivers; and it was the higheſt crime to defile water, inſomuch that Tiridates, when he was going to Nero, refuſed to ſail, becauſe he held it unlawful to pollute the ſea :
neceſſitatibus violare naturam eam fas non putavit.
- HYDE, P. 138.
After theſe libations it was uſual to addreſs the dead with a ſolemn hymn: thus Electra in the Choephoræ, having pour- ed the oblations at the tomb of her father, bids the Chorus
Attune the Pæan, And ſooth his ſhade with ſolemn harmony.
But here it was of abſolute neceſſity, as a charm to evoke the dead,
. The Perſians were greatly addicted to (what we call) magical incantations, which probably they learned from the conquered Chaldæans; ſo that nothing, as Stanley well obſerves, could be more in character than theſe rites, this
.
The Perſian monarchs had officers whoſe province it was to obſerve, and inform the king of all that was tranſacted in his wide dominions; they were, therefore, called the King's Eyes: this was an office of great truſt, and uſually aſſigned to the moſt faithful and honourable Satraps. - STANLEY.
And now, pour donner le congé à ces remarques, the tranflator thinks it neceſſary to declare, that living altogether in a private and retired ſtation, he had not, during his engagement in this work, the opportunity of confulting any learned friend on any dificulty, and difficulties enough occurred; neither did he know, till after the tranflation was publiſhed, that there were any annotations on Æschylus, except what Pauw has given with Stanley's edition: therefore whatever miſtakes or inaccuracies may have eſcaped him, they are to be attributed intirely to his own want of judgment. In reading Pauw he could obſerve, that he ſometimes fuffered himself to be hurried into errors; and he lamented, that ſo able a critic would not allow himself time to reviſe what he had written: this he ascribed to a certain impetuofity of temper, which ſeems natural to him; he alſo diſapproves his rude and offenfive bluntneſs, and wished that he had learned to facrifice to the Graces; but he saw in this ſaucy man much erudition, a bold genius, and a strong conception of his author's meaning, which enabled him to elucidate ſome paſſages, which were before involved in tenfold darkness: no wonder therefore, that he gratefully acknowledged his obligations to him. But he foon found, that he had taken an unpopular part; the tranflation was ſcarcely publiſhed, when he was taught to know, that his honourable mention of Pauw had given offence; he was ſurpriſed and hurt at this, but was quickly informed, that M. D'Orville had made a collection of Pauw's crudities, and publiſhed them purpoſely to expoſe the man. Shortly after this, a learned friend ſent him Mr. Heath's notes: this gentleman was fo highly offended at Pauw's " wanton inſolence and contumelious arrogance," that he sees nothing in him but " the groſſeft ignorance, and a perpetual alacrity in blundering;" and if at any time he is compelled to acknowledge the juſtneſs of a remark, he accounts for it as for the blind man's ſhooting the crow; he therefore profeſſedly writes againft Pauw: this has carried him too frequently into an afperity of ſtyle, more indecent than that which had excited his indignation; nation; befides that horrid ſneer, which is like the American mode of tarring and feathering a man that has been ſo un- happy as to offend them: this is the more to be lamented, as in every other reſpect Mr. Heath ſeems to have been a man of a very candid and amiable diſpoſition. But this is not the worſt; his perpetual propensity to reprobate Pauw, has fome- times mifled him to obſervations very unworthy of him as a ſcholar and a critic. In this cafe, what could the tranflator do? His nature is moſt averſe to difputation; but theſe annotators pull violently different ways, the tranſlation was between them, and was given to the public before he had ſeen the learned obſervations of the latter; he has done what he is perfuaded a fair and honest man ought to do; he has carefully reviſed the tranflation; where he is convinced that he was miſtaken, he has acknowledged and corrected the mistake; whereever in a diſputed paſſage he thinks he has reaſon to adhere to his former interpretation, he fairly gives his reason; the learned reader will judge: Mr. Heath's great and deſerved reputation made this in a manner neceſſary for his own vindication; but he hopes, that he has not ſuffered any aſperity to mingle with his diſſent, as he would be the firſt to be ashamed of having violated that candour and good manners which are due from one gentleman to another.