Digitized copy served by HathiTrust and originating from Harvard University.
Potter's English wording, long-s typography, page breaks, speeches, lyric divisions, and notes are preserved. English verse units receive sequential CTS citations. Translation groups point explicitly to passages of the Smyth/Perseus Greek edition; individual English lines are not assigned unsupported one-to-one alignments. Catchwords are encoded as fw and explanatory notes as EpiDoc apparatus entries.
This pointer pattern extracts an English verse unit.
CTS edition: urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0085.tlg006.potter1779-eng2.
THE Chorus in the former play, with a dignity and firmneſs becoming ſenators of Argos, had expreſſed their abhorrence of the murder of Agamemnon even to the face of Clytemneſtra and Ægisthus, and threatened them with the anger of the Gods and the vengeance of Oreſtes: this is here executed.
The characters of Oreſtes and Electra are
finely ſupported. A pious reſentment of the
murder of his father, a conſciouſneſs of his
Electra's character (in the
words of the critic) is that of a fierce and
determined, but withal of a generous and
virtuous woman. Her motives to revenge
were, principally, a ſtrong ſenſe of juſtice,
and ſuperior affection for a father; not a
rooted, unnatural averſion to a mother.
She acted, as appears, not from the perturbation
Conſiſtently with
this character, when ſhe had given Oreſtes a
ſpirited account of their father's murder,
which drew him to declare his reſolution to
revenge it, ſhowing at the ſame time ſome
ſign of remorſe, ſhe adds a ſhort relation of the
barbarous indignities offered to the dead body;
a deed of horror which, ſhe knew, would
ſhock his ſoul. She had ſeen her father murdered, his body mangled, and buried without
its honours; her brother, whom ſhe loved
with the tendereſt affection, deprived of his
throne, and exiled from his country; her
mother in the arms of Ægisthus abandoning
herſelf to her looſe and infamous pleaſures;
ſhe was herſelf continually expoſed to the inſults and barbarous treatment of this ungentle
mother; what wonder then that a ſpirit naturally lofty and ſenſible ſhould catch fire at
theſe injuries, contract a wolfish fierceneſs, as
ſhe expreſſes it, and urge her brother to ſacrifice theſe proud oppreſſors to juſtice and revenge? But the poet, with great regard to
The ſcene of this tragedy, as of the former, is at Argos before the royal palace. Oreſtes, according to the cuſtom of ancient times, offering his hair on the tomb of his father, ſees a train of females advancing from the houſe, and bringing libations to the tomb; from whence the play receives its name. The action is afterwards removed to the area before the palace. This requires no change of ſcene.
The beginning of this play is loſt; but fortunately the ſense remains intire. Oreſtes, returned from banishment, and advancing to the tomb of his father, firſt implores the protection of Mercury, as the conductor of the dead to the ſhades below, which was his known office : thus Horace,
Tu pias lætis animas reponis Sedibus.
Then addreſſes his father's manes, whilſt he places on the tomb his hair before confecrated to the river Inachus ; and this in perfect conformity to ancient uſage : thus Achilles at the funeral of Patroclus cuts off his hair, ſacred to Sperchius: inſtances abound. As the Grecians wore their hair long, and dreſſed it with much elegance, we may ſuppoſe, that the depriving themſelves of ſo conſiderable an ornament was an indication of grief; we are led to this by the words of Pindar,
O nature, in the bad how great an ill! But in the virtuous ſtrong thy pow'r to ſave. See, ſhe hath shorn the' extremity of her locks, Anxious of beauty, the ſame woman ſtill.
The Chorus, as more experienced through their age, had inſtructed Electra how to addreſs the ſhade of her father, to pour her firſt vows for bleſſings on herſelf and her friends, and particularly to remember Oreſtes. As he was dearest to her heart, ſhe ſoon forgets herſelf; and her warmest vows are for his happy return ; then, recurring to what particularly concerns herſelf, ſhe prays, not for a reſtoration to her princely rank, but for the virtues becoming her sex, that ſhe may be much more modest than her mother, and her hand more holy. Propriety of character is one of the great excellencies of Æschylus, of which this is a very delicate inſtance.
L 3
The Chorus begins this Pæan to the dead with lamentations for their loft lord ; they are proceeding to invoke his aid ; but this is ſcarce mentioned, when they break off with outcries, the prophetic rapture ſeizes them, and impreſſes on the imagination the youthful hero in all his radiant arms coming to avenge the death of his father. This is the sublime and daring ſpirit which diſtinguiſhes Æschylus from all other writers. It makes one bluſh to point out this to the reader ; but Mr. Heath has rendered it neceſſary, who, by underſtanding this optative not interrogative (as he expreſſes himself), hath annihilated the beauty and grandeur of the image.
Much good wit hath been thrown away upon this paſſage, which might well have been ſpared, had the deſign of the poet been attended to. No diſcovery is from hence raiſed ; but the mind of Electra is deeply ſtruck; ſhe reasons, and conjectures, and ſo is finely prepared for the diſcovery which ſoon follows. Aristotle has mentioned this, but in his dryeſt manner; yet it is plain, that he underſtood it thus, for he has drawn up the reasoning of Electra into a syllogism in form. But envy and buffoonery are perverse qualities.
Hoc δεύτερον τεκμήριον plane ridiculum est; Et mirum, quod eruditiſſimus comicus id non perfuderit aceto ſuo: Sentiunt omnes, qui aliquid sentiunt.—PAUW.
The ladies, in the simplicity of ancient times, valued themſelves much, and indeed were highly esteemed for their skill in embroidery : these rich wrought veſts made great part of the wealth of noble houſes: Andromache, Helen, and Penelope were celebrated for their fine work, of which Minerva herſelf was the patroness ; and Dido was as excellent as the beſt of them. As they could not but know what their own hands had wrought, nothing could bring them clearer conviction than a sight of their own curious labours. Oreſtes was nearly arrived to manhood, when he left, or was driven from Argos ; it must therefore be extreme malice, or rival jealousy, which could give this paſſage so ridiculous a turn as to ſuppoſe, that Orestes now wore a veſt made for him in his infancy ; beſides, the word ὕφασμα, as Stanley candidly obſerves, is a general term ; and the reader is left at his liberty to underſtand by it a belt, or any other piece of embroidery : certainly it was not the vestment of Orestes, for he returned in the habit of a peasant ; and it concerned him greatly, that no part of his dreſs ſhould discover him to Clytemnestra.
A great poet gives every image, every circumſtance a peculiar propriety: this does not arise here merely from the allusion to the eagle, which, as the imperial bird, finely characteriſes the royal Agamemnon ; but it here acquires new grace from what the naturaliſts have told us of the enmity of the eagle to the serpent race, and their frequent battles, some of which ended fatally to the generous bird, as here : Virgil has given us a fine deſcription of one of these battles, wherein the eagle is conqueror:
Utque volans alte raptum cum fulva draconem Fert aquila, implicuitque pedes, atque unguibus hæsit: Saucius at serpens sinuoſa volumina versat, Arrectisque horret squamis, et sibilat ore Arduus insurgens: illa haud minus urget obunco Luctantem rostro, simul æthera verberat alis.
As when th' imperial eagle soars on high, And bears some speckled serpent thro' the sky; While her sharp talons gripe the bleeding prey, In many a fold her curling volumes play; Her starting brazen scales with horror rise, The sanguine flames flash dreadful from her eyes : She writhes, and hisses at her foe, in vain, Who wings at ease the wide aërial plain; With her strong hooky beak the captive plies, And bears the struggling prey, triumphant, thro' the skies.
Æschylus here in brief deſcribes the miſerable ſtate of the unexpiated murderer, his interdiction from every altar, every table, and every house ; no one holding converſe or intercourſe with him as polluted and abominable. This indeed was uſually the punishment inflicted by the ſtate ; but the poet here finely aſcribes it to the vengeance of the Furies.
Mr. Heath, who hath given us a ſpecimen of his critical acumen on the former part of this ſpeech, obſerves here, that Oreſtes cannot be ſuppoſed to reckon his own penury among the cauſes that incite him to revenge his father's death ; but his princely generofity was affected at the poverty of those illustrious conquerors who had overturned Troy. It must indeed have hurt his generous mind to ſee ſuch men enslaved by a woman, and an effeminate man ; this the poet with great judgment observes , but he no where ſays that their new tyrants had touched the soldiers spoils : he makes Ægisthus ſay, that he was master of Agamemnon's treasures ; and Electra, in her firſt addreſs to her father's ſhade, with much indignation ſays to him,
And indeed it might be ſome aggravation to the misfortunes
even of a brave prince, to see the ſhameless ufurpers of his poſſeſſions waſting his wealth in riot, whilft he was compelled to
feek a miferable and precarious ſubſiſtence from the charity of
others.
The grief, which Electra expreſſed for the murder of her father, flowed from a generous and noble ſpirit: her reſentment muſt therefore be generous and noble.
This grief is compared to the ſcourge of the Furies, from whence a double claſh is heard ; one given by the shade of Agamemnon, ready to aſſiſt their revenge ; the other by the murderers, which was moſt to be feared, becauſe their unhallowed hands were prompt to deeds of violence.
Mr. Heath acutely obſerves, that the true ſenſe of this paſſage hath eſcaped the ſagacity of all the interpreters , who have been led into their error by uniformly taking it as referring to the murder of Agamemnon ; whereas, in truth, it relates ſolely to poor Electra, whoſe ears had been ſoundly boxed by her mother ; and the words are to be rendered thus, She ſtruck a martial ſtroke (meaning the firſt box on the ear she gave her daughter, as the ſignal of battle), then might you ſee many cuffs often repeated, her hand twisted in my hair, after the manner of a Cissian female warrior.
Spirit of Pauw, be this an atonement for all the inſults heaped upon thee!
The deſign of Electra here is to excite her brother to avenge the murder of their father ; and we ſhall perceive, that this is finely carried on. Upon the accidental mention of "fairer fortune," ſhe ſays, how ſhall we obtain it ? by ſpeaking our griefs aloud, or by flattering our mother ? but they admit no ſoftening, nor can we ever think of her with any degree of tenderness: she ſtruck the bloody ſtroke, ſhe repeated it on his unhappy head with all the fierceness of a Cissian Virago ; then ſhe buried him without his honours. Oreſtes anſwers preciſely to this, that vengeance, by the aſſiſtance of the Gods, and by his hand, would inflict puniſhment for this wrong done to his father : but as he ſhows himſelf affected at the revenge to be executed, Electra proceeds to give him an account of the indignities offered to the dead body.
To mangle a dead body was more horrid than the act of murder itſelf, as it made the manes of the deceased a diſhonourable ſpectacle among the ſhades below, where they were thought to retain these disfiguring mutilations, and were of course disabled from any acts of vengeance. Plato built a fanciful philofophy on this opinion, of which Virgil knew how to make the true poetic uſe, when he deſcribes Eriphyle pointing to the wound of her son,
Mæſtamque Eriphylen Crudelis nati monstrantem vulnera cernit.
The figure of Deiphobus is repreſented under the ſame idea.
Electra, having given a relation of the injuries and diſhonours done to her father, now proceeds to the ill treatment which ſhe had herſelf received. Virgins had an honourable apartment in the house aſſigned them, the chaste reserve of ancient manners requiring this ſeparation from the familiarity, and even the eyes of men : Electra was not admitted to this, but like a mischievous cur turned into the court, and contemptuously neglected: this was the utmoſt indignity.
Affection to her father peculiarly marks the character of Electra, of which she could not give a ſtronger inſtance than this. Deprived as she now was of all her share of her father's riches, ſhe had it not in her power to offer any preſents at his tomb ; but ſhould Ægisthus be ſlain, ſhe devotes even her nuptial dowry to that purpoſe.
Oreſtes ſhows throughout ſome marks of tenderneſs for his mother, and a reluctance to ſhed her blood. When Electra had urged him to do the deed inſtantly, he pauſes a while to aſk for what cauſe Clytemneſtra had ſent these oblations to the tomb. being told that ſhe was affrighted with portentous dreams, he particularly inquires what they were. The viſion is finely and ſtrongly conceived: he takes it as a prodigy ſent from the Gods to confirm his reſolution, he catches fire from it, and declares She must die A violent death: and with a dragon's rage This hand ſhall kill her. The ſpirit and beauty of the original is inimitable, [cite_start]
.
Clytemneſtra had told Agamemnon that Strophius king of Phocæa had taken Oreſtes under his protection from any dangers or diſturbances that might ariſe in the ſtate. the young prince had indeed the good fortune to eſcape from his mother, and was hoſpitably received at Phocis, from whence he now returned in diſguiſe, attended by Pylades the ſon of Strophius, whoſe friendſhip was ſo faithful to Oreſtes in all his diſtreſſes, that it became proverbial.
When Althea, the daughter of Theſtius, was delivered of Meleager, the Deſtinies attended at her labour, and upon the birth of the child, throwing a log on the fire as they ſpun his thread of life, pronounced this charm, "O new-born child, we aſſign the ſame period of exiſtence to this log and to thee:" then vaniſhed. Althea ſnatched the log from the flames, and preſerved it with great care, till Meleager having ſlain her two brothers, for rudely taking the head of the Calydonian boar from Atalanta, to whom he had preſented it, this unnatural mother threw the fatal brand into the fire, and the charm of the Deſtinies was fulfilled. This ſtory is told by Ovid, Met. l. 8.
This ſtory is alſo told by Ovid, ibid. Minos, the celebrated king of Crete, was besieging Alcathoe, where Niſus reigned, on whoſe head grew a lock of purple hair, on which the safety of the city depended. Scylla, the daughter of Niſus, in love with the Cretan king, as Ovid relates it, or bribed with ſome female gewgaws according to Æschylus, entered her father's apartment as he lay aſleep, and cut off this charmed lock. The city was immediately taken.
This is a very tragical tale. All the men of Lemnos that were able to bear arms, had invaded Thrace, and continued the war three years. their wives, ſtung with rage and jealouſy, formed an horrid deſign, which they executed the very night on which their husbands returned, to murder every male on the iſland. Hypſipyle alone ſaved her father Thoas. Statius has related the whole transaction with his usual spirit, Theb. v. 1. 70.
Hospitality was so highly regarded, that it was amongst the most honourable of the labours of their greatest heroes to punish those who offered insults to strangers: so that it was not beneath the dignity of Clytemnestra in person to invite these travellers into her house ; she even takes a pride in recounting the magnificence with which they should be entertained.
This ſpeech conceals the greateſt art under an apparent ſimplicity; Oreſtes appears as a ruſtic Phocian, and unaquainted with the perſon of the king; of courſe he muſt be ſuppoſed to be a ſtranger to the tranſactions of that court, and the real hiſtory of Oreſtes; this prevents all ſuſpicion: the ſame affected ſimplicity and innocence is preſerved in his next ſpeech.
Electra's affection for her brother induces her to attend Clytemneſtra. on hearing the feigned account of his death, ſhe breaks into a formal exclamation on the curſe of Thyeſtes, proper enough as ſhe was circumſtanced; but what nature would not have dictated had her grief been real: ſhe cautiously avoids aſking the ſtrangers any question, and even leads the queen from making inquiries, by expreſſing a fondneſs for her brother, and throwing out a ſevere reflection, which ſhe had reason to think would give great offence, and ſo ſhorten the conversation.
Oreſtes had enjoined the Chorus to be silent where they ought, and to ſpeak where their voice might aid him. they had kept themselves near the tomb till they saw him enter the palace; they then advance with an intention of aſſiſting his cause, as occasions ſhould arise: Giliſſa ſoon gave them a very favourable one, which they readily embrace, by conjuring that faithful ſervant to call forth Ægisthus alone without his guards, which facilitated the enterpriſe of Oreſtes; to induce her to this, they were obliged to give her hopes of some favourable event; but though they knew her fidelity, they could not be enough aſſured of her prudence to trust her with the important ſecret: had they told her that the person, who appeared under the character of a meſſenger, had brought tidings that would give her joy, they had discovered too much; they prudently therefore refer her to the power of Jupiter, who might redreſs these evils: How? replies the nurse; Oreſtes, our hope, is dead: the answer of the Chorus is so ambiguous, that she could not possibly comprehend it in its full meaning, yet clear enough to induce her to ask whether they had heard any thing that contradicted the report: not to anſwer this plain question in the negative, was to leave her mind under the impreſſion of hope, and with this she is ordered to carry her message, and leave the event to the Gods: this required some management, and it is finely conducted. A criticism of Mr. Heath has given occaſion to this long note.
Stanley has marked the ſenſe of this paſſage ſo preciſely, that one is ſurpriſed to see it afterwards mistaken, but Pauw has ſaid μέγα ναίων στόμιον est orcus : δὸς ἀνδρα, i. e. Agamemnonem: ejus umbra rediret domum ut filio adeſſet. Mr. Heath, who always hath a prurience to quarrel with Pauw quo jure, quâve injuriâ, has diſcovered that μέγα ναίων στόμιον respicit Apollinem speluncam Delphis inſidentem, ἀνδρὰ Oreſtem. We allow the critic his authorities, that στόμιον is ſometimes uſed to exprime the cave at Delphos; but we cannot give up the paſſage cited by Stanley from Pindar. Had Apollo been here intended, we certainly ſhould have heard something of the μαλεύμαλα τα πυθόχρηστα. But, ſays the critic, Agamemnon was dead, nothing remained of him but his aſhes and his ſhade, præter cineres et umbram tenuem, therefore it could not be ſaid of him, that he beheld his house ἐλευθερίως, και λαμπρῶς, καὶ Φιλιόις ὄμμασι, but this is ſaid in defiance of Æschylus and all antiquity. Could this learned person have forgot that Darius, who alſo was aſhes and a shade, was addreſsed as a mighty and magnificent power, δάιμονα μεγαλαυχῆ? Could he have forgot that Oreſtes had evoked his father to behold the combat; and that Electra had implored Proserpine to give him a glorious force, ἔυμορφον κράλος?
Stanley has marked the ſenſe of this paſſage ſo preciſely, that one is ſurpriſed to see it afterwards mistaken, but Pauw has ſaid μέγα ναίων στόμιον est orcus : δὸς ἀνδρα, i. e. Agamemnonem: ejus umbra rediret domum ut filio adeſſet. Mr. Heath, who always hath a prurience to quarrel with Pauw quo jure, quâve injuriâ, has diſcovered that μέγα ναίων στόμιον respicit Apollinem speluncam Delphis inſidentem, ἀνδρὰ Oreſtem. We allow the critic his authorities, that στόμιον is ſometimes uſed to exprime the cave at Delphos; but we cannot give up the paſſage cited by Stanley from Pindar. Had Apollo been here intended, we certainly ſhould have heard something of the μαλεύμαλα τα πυθόχρηστα. But, ſays the critic, Agamemnon was dead, nothing remained of him but his aſhes and his ſhade, præter cineres et umbram tenuem, therefore it could not be ſaid of him, that he beheld his house ἐλευθερίως, και λαμπρῶς, καὶ Φιλιόις ὄμμασι, but this is ſaid in defiance of Æschylus and all antiquity. Could this learned person have forgot that Darius, who alſo was aſhes and a shade, was addreſsed as a mighty and magnificent power, δάιμονα μεγαλαυχῆ? Could he have forgot that Oreſtes had evoked his father to behold the combat; and that Electra had implored Proserpine to give him a glorious force, ἔυμορφον κράλος?
Stanley has marked the ſenſe of this paſſage ſo preciſely, that one is ſurpriſed to see it afterwards mistaken, but Pauw has ſaid μέγα ναίων στόμιον est orcus : δὸς ἀνδρα, i. e. Agamemnonem: ejus umbra rediret domum ut filio adeſſet. Mr. Heath, who always hath a prurience to quarrel with Pauw quo jure, quâve injuriâ, has diſcovered that μέγα ναίων στόμιον respicit Apollinem speluncam Delphis inſidentem, ἀνδρὰ Oreſtem. We allow the critic his authorities, that στόμιον is ſometimes uſed to expreſs the cave at Delphos; but we cannot give up the paſſage cited by Stanley from Pindar. Had Apollo been here intended, we certainly ſhould have heard something of the μαντεύματα τὰ πυθόχρηστα. But, ſays the critic, Agamemnon was dead, nothing remained of him but his aſhes and his ſhade, præter cineres et umbram tenuem, therefore it could not be ſaid of him, that he beheld his house ἐλευθερίως, καὶ λαμπρῶς, καὶ φιλιόις ὄμμασι, but this is ſaid in defiance of Æschylus and all antiquity. Could this learned person have forgot that Darius, who alſo was aſhes and a shade, was addreſsed as a mighty and magnificent power, δάιμονα μεγαλαυχῆ? Could he have forgot that Oreſtes had evoked his father to behold the combat; and that Electra had implored Proserpine to give him a glorious force, εὔμορφον κράτος?
The mention of Perſeus here obliquely insinuates, that Clytemneſtra was as dangerous and dreadful as Meduſa, on whom Perſeus could not look when he flew her.
Orestes afterwards in his own vindication pleads thus to the father of Clytemnestra : Should wives with ruffian boldness kill their husbands, Then fly for refuge to their sons, and think, Baring their breasts, to captivate their pity, These deeds would pass for trivial, as their mood, For something or for nothing, shall incline them. EURIP. ELECT.