---
name: "gsd-code-review"
description: "Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems"
metadata:
short-description: "Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems"
---
## A. Skill Invocation
- This skill is invoked by mentioning `$gsd-code-review`.
- Treat all user text after `$gsd-code-review` as `{{GSD_ARGS}}`.
- If no arguments are present, treat `{{GSD_ARGS}}` as empty.
## B. AskUserQuestion → request_user_input Mapping
GSD workflows use `AskUserQuestion` (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex `request_user_input`:
Parameter mapping:
- `header` → `header`
- `question` → `question`
- Options formatted as `"Label" — description` → `{label: "Label", description: "description"}`
- Generate `id` from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscores
Batched calls:
- `AskUserQuestion([q1, q2])` → single `request_user_input` with multiple entries in `questions[]`
Multi-select workaround:
- Codex has no `multiSelect`. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.
Execute mode fallback:
- When `request_user_input` is rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.
## C. Task() → spawn_agent Mapping
GSD workflows use `Task(...)` (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
- `Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y")` → `spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")`
- `Task(model="...")` → omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)
- `fork_context: false` by default — GSD agents load their own context via `` blocks
Parallel fan-out:
- Spawn multiple agents → collect agent IDs → `wait(ids)` for all to complete
Result parsing:
- Look for structured markers in agent output: `CHECKPOINT`, `PLAN COMPLETE`, `SUMMARY`, etc.
- `close_agent(id)` after collecting results from each agent
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality problems.
Spawns the gsd-code-reviewer agent to analyze code at the specified depth level. Produces REVIEW.md artifact in the phase directory with severity-classified findings.
Arguments:
- Phase number (required) — which phase's changes to review (e.g., "2" or "02")
- `--depth=quick|standard|deep` (optional) — review depth level, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config
- quick: Pattern-matching only (~2 min)
- standard: Per-file analysis with language-specific checks (~5-15 min, default)
- deep: Cross-file analysis including import graphs and call chains (~15-30 min)
- `--files file1,file2,...` (optional) — explicit comma-separated file list, skips SUMMARY/git scoping (highest precedence for scoping)
Output: {padded_phase}-REVIEW.md in phase directory + inline summary of findings
@C:/Users/rahul/Desktop/specforge/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/code-review.md
Phase: {{GSD_ARGS}} (first positional argument is phase number)
Optional flags parsed from {{GSD_ARGS}}:
- `--depth=VALUE` — Depth override (quick|standard|deep). If provided, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config.
- `--files=file1,file2,...` — Explicit file list override. Has highest precedence for file scoping per D-08. When provided, workflow skips SUMMARY.md extraction and git diff fallback entirely.
Context files (AGENTS.md, SUMMARY.md, phase state) are resolved inside the workflow via `gsd-sdk query init.phase-op` and delegated to agent via `` blocks.
This command is a thin dispatch layer. It parses arguments and delegates to the workflow.
Execute the code-review workflow from @C:/Users/rahul/Desktop/specforge/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/code-review.md end-to-end.
The workflow (not this command) enforces these gates:
- Phase validation (before config gate)
- Config gate check (workflow.code_review)
- File scoping (--files override > SUMMARY.md > git diff fallback)
- Empty scope check (skip if no files)
- Agent spawning (gsd-code-reviewer)
- Result presentation (inline summary + next steps)