--- name: research-briefing description: Build a focused literature and citation briefing from PapersFlow. Use when the user wants paper search, citation verification, related-paper discovery, or citation graph exploration. --- # Research Briefing Use this skill when a user wants a high-signal research briefing grounded in the hosted `papersflow-mcp` server. ## Workflow 1. Resolve the user's target topic, title, DOI, or seed paper. 2. Start with `search_literature` for broad discovery. 3. Use `verify_citation` when the user gives a citation string, DOI, URL, PubMed ID, arXiv ID, or uncertain bibliographic reference. 4. Use `find_related_papers` when the user wants nearby work around a seed paper. 5. Use `get_citation_graph` when the user wants a graph view with references, incoming citations, and optionally similar papers. 6. Use `get_paper_neighbors` when the user wants a one-hop grouped view instead of a graph-first view. 7. Use `expand_citation_graph` only after you already have seed node ids from a previous graph result. 8. Use `fetch` when the user wants a richer single-paper record after search or graph exploration. ## Output Style - Prefer short grouped sections over long prose. - Include paper titles, years, identifiers, and why they matter. - If the user asked for a graph-oriented answer, explicitly distinguish: - references - later citations - similar papers - If the graph result looks noisy, say so instead of pretending the neighborhood is authoritative. ## Tool Guidance ### Use `search_literature` Use for: - topic exploration - early-stage paper discovery - short lists of candidate seed papers ### Use `verify_citation` Use for: - checking a citation string - normalizing a DOI or paper URL - producing a reliable paper identifier before deeper exploration ### Use `get_citation_graph` Use for: - seed-centered graph exploration - showing how a paper connects to prior and later work Prefer this when the user explicitly asks for a graph, network, map, or influence chain. ### Use `get_paper_neighbors` Use for: - concise grouped neighbors - "show me the references / citations / similar papers" requests Prefer this over the graph tool when the user cares more about grouped lists than graph structure. ### Use `expand_citation_graph` Use only when: - you already have valid node ids from a previous graph result - the user wants to grow the graph one hop farther Do not guess node ids. ## Examples - User asks: "Find five strong papers on retrieval-augmented generation evaluation and tell me which one to start with." - User asks: "Verify this citation and give me a normalized version." - User asks: "Show me the citation graph around Attention Is All You Need." - User asks: "Expand the graph from these two node ids and tell me where the important branches are."