{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "I have debated between abstain and yes for this proposal for a while. I recognise the need for a funding mechanism that complements Catalyst, that allows more established projects to receive development funding that doesn’t detract from Catalyst’s role as an innovation engine for new and smaller projects. I also appreciate that it could be too much to expect each and every project to seek treasury funding every time that they have a proposal for new products or features. This increases administrative burden on both the developers and DReps/CC.\n\nHowever, I also respect that cryptocurrency is usually about removing/reducing middlemen and this approach also reduces the ability for DReps to have a say in what gets funded. Similar to my rationale for the Paid Open-Source Model proposal though, I feel that this does fill a gap in current funding avenues, allowing developers to focus on building rather than bureaucracy.\n\nWith that said, I will be watching the performance and outputs from this DAO going forward before committing to future funding.\n\nWhile not originally one of my selections during the Ekklesia budget reconciliation process, I have decided to vote in favour of funding this proposal at this time."
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}