{ "@context": { "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm", "body": { "@id": "CIP100:body", "@context": { "references": { "@id": "CIP100:references", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference", "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference", "label": "CIP100:reference-label", "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri", "referenceHash": { "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash", "@context": { "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm" } } } }, "comment": "CIP100:comment", "externalUpdates": { "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates", "@context": { "title": "CIP100:update-title", "uri": "CIP100:uri" } } } }, "authors": { "@id": "CIP100:authors", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name", "witness": { "@id": "CIP100:witness", "@context": { "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm", "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey", "signature": "CIP100:signature" } } } } }, "authors": [], "body": { "comment": "I vote YES on the treasury withdrawal action “Eternl: Path to Sustainability - v2” (fbb8d1a4a8d6b62f8cd706944a0582b884c2b90187b8fada7953d5c6a33eb5a7#0).\n\nI voted YES to funding this last year, with the benefit of the doubt. I was disappointed to see Milestone Acceptance Forms simply state “Eternl was online for users this month” when I first started to check in on various project progress in late 2025. I also voted to fund AdaStat and Cexplorer last year and that funding has resulted in a visible change to my daily interactions with the Cardano blockchain, often for the better. My interactions with Eternl, have not evolved in the same way. With that said, version 2.0 did drop right around budget season last year and 2.1 has just released this year, although I wish these big upgrades didn’t feel like they were held back just for budget season.\n\nI was prepared to vote ABSTAIN or even NO this year but the recent events around other ecosystem wallets have shifted the landscape somewhat. The Lace 2.0 release, and the long-awaited mobile wallet, has been a massive disappointment. So much so I deleted it from my mobile the same day. For a flagship wallet from a founding entity, the one who wrote the original Icarus light wallet reference implementation that Yoroi was built from in 2018 no less, it was an overwhelming let down. For me, a mobile wallet should have hardware wallet support and the ability to send via your own node as a minimum requirement or the cypherpunk dream really is dead.\n\nSecondly, the whole Yoroi/SecondFi incident, from another founding entity, has been a disaster. Forcefully migrating users from the longest standing open-source wallet, available on both desktop and mobile, with nearly 8 years of track record, to a closed-source, poorly implemented wallet which resulted in the massive hack was wholly unacceptable. The brand damage, the financial cost to users who did not ask for the migration, and everything else that came with is reprehensible.\n\nAlthough Eternl is closed-source and could equally carry the same risk while not having open-source code for the community to evaluate. It has a track record for security, is one of the most widely used wallets, and offers a strong feature set for advanced users. It remains my most used wallet provider. Additionally, it is the only wallet that supports Mainent, Preprod, Preview AND SanchoNet. No other wallet can boast that level of support and much like testnet SPOs, that service provides no income, but allows us all to develop and test new platforms and features ahead of Mainnet. Ensuring Mainnet stays secure, allows new people to experiment with the Cardano technology without any financial risk, burden or implications. That availability alone is invaluable and should be used to onboard more users than it is. For these reasons, I support this bridge funding towards a more sustainable Eternl wallet." }, "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256" }