{"topic_id": "1", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Asteroids Endangering Earth", "topic_description": "Articles related to asteroids that pose danger of impact to Earth."}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "小行星危害地球", "topic_description": "与对地球构成撞击危害的小行星相关的文章。"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "سیارک ها کره زمین را به خطر می اندازند", "topic_description": "مقالات مربوط به سیارک ها که خطر ضربه به کره زمین را دارند"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "سیارات در معرض خطر زمین", "topic_description": "مقالات مربوط به سیارک ‌ هایی که خطر برخورد با زمین را تهدید می ‌ کنند."}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Asteroids Endangering Earth", "topic_description": "与对地球产生影响的危险的天蝎座有关的文章。"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Астероиды, угрожающие Земле", "topic_description": "Статьи, связанные с астероидами, которые представляют опасность воздействия на Землю."}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Details about asteroids that currently or in the future may pose danger of impact to Earth (names, measurements, age, etc).\nInformation on the risk of an asteroid impacting Earth.", "somewhat_valuable": "N/A", "not_that_valuable": "Information on discussions about asteroids possibly impacting Earth at some point.", "non_relevant": "Details about asteroids that previously impacted Earth or Earth’s atmosphere.\nInformation about asteroids and the asteroid belt in general.\nGeneral research conducted on asteroids that is not focused on the danger of impact.\nInformation about asteroids impacting other planets.\nInformation on research about other planets.\n"}, "fas": {"very_valuable": "Mention of asteroids striking Earth with description", "somewhat_valuable": "Mention of asteroids striking Earth but with little information", "not_that_valuable": "May talk about asteroids without real mention of their danger", "non_relevant": "Describes meteorites, planets, stars with no relation to striking Earth"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=(415029)_2011_UL21&oldid=877055001", "text": "2011 UL21 briefly had about a 1 in a million chance of impacting in 2029. Its cumulative impact probability dropped to 1 in 71 million by 2 November 2011 when the observation arc reached 15 days. It was removed from the Sentry Risk Table on 4 November 2011 when all impact scenarios for the next 100 years or more were ruled out. During 2029, the closest approach to Earth is 1.6 AU. Palomar Observatory precovery images from 1989 and 1990 have extended the observation arc to 22 years. Its next notable close approach to the Earth will be on June 27, 2024 at a distance of 0.044 AU (6,600,000 km; 4,100,000 mi).\n\nWith an absolute magnitude of 15.8, it is one the brightest and therefor largest potentially hazardous asteroids (PHA) detected since (242450) 2004 QY2. The next largest PHA (based on absolute magnitude) discovered in 2011 is 2011 WO41 with an absolute magnitude of 16.8. ", "date": "2019-01-06"}}
{"topic_id": "3", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "rus"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "British royal news impacts", "topic_description": "What political and economic impacts does news about the British royal family have domestically and abroad?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "英国王室新闻的影响", "topic_description": "英国王室新闻对国内及国外的政治和经济有什么影响？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "Влияние британских королевских новостей", "topic_description": "Какое политическое и экономическое влияние новости о британской королевской семье имеют внутри страны и за рубежом?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "اثرات اخبار سلطنتی بریتانیا", "topic_description": "اخبار مربوط به خانواده سلطنتی بریتانیا در داخل و خارج از کشور چه تأثیرات سیاسی و اقتصادی دارد ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "英国玫瑰新闻impacts", "topic_description": "什么波兰和经济影响了英国rotically和foy的领域？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Британские королевские новости влияют", "topic_description": "Какие политические и экономические последствия имеют новости о британской королевской семье как внутри страны, так и за рубежом?"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Articles that examine the economic impacts of the royal family, such as 'the Kate Effect' in consumer marketing, increase in tourism due to royal weddings, effects on local British businesses, the business opportunities that exist and different laws that are changed to accommodate the wedding. As well as articles that talk about the effect of the actions by the Royal Family towards US leaders on US/UK diplomatic relations, the impact of the baby being born on Brexit and how the UK looks as a whole stable nation. Articles that argue the lack of political or economic impact the Royal Family has over time and the nationalistic pride Black British people feel by the royal wedding.", "somewhat_valuable": "Articles that show people care but not a substantial discussion of the economic or political impacts. The impact of Royal Family affairs on the society and the people's outlook by police action and influence on MLB sports. ", "not_that_valuable": "Articles that give a number of how many people attended or followed Royal affairs such as a wedding within the country and around the world, how many people went into the streets, followed on social media around the world.", "non_relevant": "Articles that described a royal event with no political or economic impacts (announcing pregnancies, marriages, births, wedding schedules, non-political figures who attend, and christenings), the cost of outfits, description of personal moments between royal family members (not signing prenups, partying with popstars, gift exchanges between royal members), or did not talk about royal family or the UK at all."}, "rus": {"very_valuable": "Information regarding economic and political impacts of the British royal family in the UK and worldwide", "somewhat_valuable": "Information related to the British royal family and their interactions with politics or the economy", "not_that_valuable": "information about the royal family", "non_relevant": "information not about the royals"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wedding_of_Princess_Eugenie_and_Jack_Brooksbank&oldid=841040200", "text": "Announcement of engagement\nPrincess Eugenie of York in 2013\n\nPrincess Eugenie of York is the second daughter of Prince Andrew, Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York. Jack Brooksbank is a British nightclub manager, a distant relation of the Brooksbank baronets,[notes 1] and a third cousin twice removed of Princess Eugenie through Thomas Coke, 2nd Earl of Leicester.[notes 2] The couple have been dating for seven years; they were first introduced by friends in a ski break in Verbier, Switzerland, where Brooksbank was working at the time.\n\nOn 22 January 2018, Buckingham Palace announced that Princess Eugenie of York would marry Jack Brooksbank in the autumn. They were engaged earlier the same month while in Nicaragua with Brooksbank giving the Princess an oval-cut Padparadscha sapphire surrounded by a halo of diamonds set on a gold band with two further diamonds on the shoulders. The ring bears a striking similarity to the engagement ring of Princess Eugenie's mother.\n\nEugenie was eighth in the line of succession to the British throne at the time the engagement was announced. As of May 2018, she is ninth in the line of succession. Although Eugenie is a member of the British royal family, she does not require the Queen's permission to marry.[notes 3] The Duke and Duchess of York expressed their delight at the news and the British Prime Minister Theresa May congratulated the couple on her Twitter account. After the announcement the couple gave an interview to Matt Baker of BBC One.\n\nThe official engagement photographs were taken in the Picture gallery at Buckingham Palace. ", "date": "2018-05-13"}}
{"topic_id": "4", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Islamic Terrorist in Strasbourg", "topic_description": "Acts of terrorism in Strasbourg, France with connections to Islam including planning, carrying out, and effects of acts"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "斯特拉斯堡的伊斯兰恐怖分子", "topic_description": "在法国斯特拉斯堡有那些与伊斯兰教相关的恐怖活动，包括活动的计划、执行及结果。"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "تروریست اسلامی در استراوسبورگ", "topic_description": "عملیات تروریستی در شهر استراسبورگ، فرانسه با ارتباطات به اسلام از جمله برنامه ریزی،  اجرا و اثرات عملیات"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "تروریست اسلامی در استراسبورگ", "topic_description": "اعمال تروریستی در استراسبورگ ، فرانسه با ارتباطات با اسلام از جمله برنامه ریزی ، انجام و اثرات اعمال"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "鍏�������������", "topic_description": "带或论在法国，法国，包括planning,carrying out,and effects of acts"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Исламский террорист в Страсбурге", "topic_description": "Акты терроризма в Страсбурге, Франция, связанные с исламом, включая планирование, осуществление и последствия актов"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "--- Information about this specific terrorist attack in Strasbourg, including details about the attacker, and noting the connection to Islam.\n--- Information about this specific attack in Strasbourg, including details about the attacker. Article may or may not mention “Strasbourg” or “Islam”, however terrorism is at least suspected.\n", "somewhat_valuable": "Information about this specific attack, however not clear if related to terrorism.", "not_that_valuable": "Information about the fact that many Islamic terrorists jailed in France will be released soon. ", "non_relevant": "--- Info about a suspected terror attack, but not in Strasbourg and unknown if connected to Islam.\n--- Info about previous terrorist attacks.\n--- A short mention of the terrorist attack in Strasbourg as one possible factor that may help to bring some calm to France (in regards to ongoing protests).\n--- Info about terrorist attacks in other countries.\n"}, "fas": {"very_valuable": "Details about suspect's life and criminal past, details on the victims, weapons found during a raid of his home, details the police had about the suspects movements after the attack, information on how suspect became radicalized, information about the effects of the acts including French government banning political rallies after the attack, a parliamentary lockdown and heightened security in other areas.", "somewhat_valuable": "ISIS claims responsibility and the suspect as their own, reports on police searches and killing of suspect, a month after the attack 5 other suspects are detained on presumed involvement, editorials claiming the French government used the attack to squelch protests (opinion based therefore judged to be less valuable)", "not_that_valuable": "How the suspect was caught without any information about the leadup to the attack or effects of it, reports on the continuation of police presence and security post-attack without any new details, reports with initial information about the numbers of casualties which later turned out to be higher, press summaries with very few details, reports with lots of background information on the suspect but no details about attack planning", "non_relevant": "Terrorist attacks in places other than Strasbourg and not mentioning ISIS, Strasbourg sports, attacks claimed by ISIS claims in places other than Strasbourg, French political rallies after the Strasbourg attack (not providing any information on the attack), attacks in Holland"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Strasbourg_attack&oldid=873403354#Victims", "text": "On 11 December 2018, at 19:50, a terrorist attack occurred in Strasbourg, France, when a man opened fire at the Christkindelsmärik. By the morning of the next day three people had died, while 12 were wounded, eight severely. At midday, six of the wounded were in a critical state. The shooter left the area by taxi and remains at large.\n\nBackground\nThe Christkindelsmärik is the Christmas market in Strasbourg, held annually on the square in front of the Strasbourg Cathedral since 1570. In 2000, a bombing plot was foiled by the French and German police: the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat had planned to detonate pressure cookers rigged as homemade bombs in the crowd at the Christkindelsmärik. Since then, the market has been under reinforced security, and subject of several suspected or actual attack attempts. In 2016, when several people were arrested in Marseille and Strasbourg for preparing a terrorist attack, cancelling the Christmas market was considered, although it was ultimately held as scheduled.\n\nOn the morning of 11 December 2018, the police raided the home of the suspect in Neudorf; he was not home, but the police found a fragmentation grenade, a loaded .22 long rifle, four knives (including two hunting knives) and ammunition in his apartment. The police had also been attempting to arrest him on suspicion of murder at this time.\n\nIncident\nThe incident started at around 19:50 local time (18:50 GMT), near Place Kléber, where the Christkindelsmärik was being held. The shooter, identified as Chérif Chekatt, entered the area through Pont du Corbeau, then went through Rue des Orfèvres, opening fire in three different locations, first at Carré-d'Or (rue des Orfèvres), then rue des Grandes-Arcades. The shooting lasted for ten minutes across multiple streets, during which time Chekatt was heard crying \"Allahu Akbar\" as he shot at the crowd. He then exchanged fire with soldiers of Opération Sentinelle, and then of the National Police; a soldier was hit in the hand, and Chekatt was himself shot in the arm.  A 45-year old Thai tourist was hit in the head in front of a restaurant and died, despite passersby attempting to resuscitate him - ambulances took over 45 minutes to arrive. The shooter then escaped in direction of Neudorf and Place de l'Étoile, taking a taxi cab; the driver was unharmed and reported to the police having taken an armed and wounded man. His testimony allowed the police to identify the gunman.\n\nThe incident led to the closure of locations around the city including the European Parliament building. Police used Twitter to relay information to the public. The shooter remains at large, with 350 men of the security forces (RAID, BRI and Sentinelle) hunting for him, supported by air units.\n\nThe French government raised their security threat level to the highest possible as the search for the gunman continued, although Justice Minister Nicole Belloubet stated on Public Sénat that a state of emergency would not be declared for the occasion. Five thousand people were stranded in a sports facility used as temporary shelter, and the European Parliament was put on lockdown. Its President, Antonio Tajani, tweeted that \"[the European Parliament] will not be intimidated by terrorist or criminal attacks [and will] continue to work and react, strengthened by freedom and democracy against terrorist violence.\"\n\nThe incident was declared an act of terrorism by French authorities.\n\nVictims\n\nThe shooter entered the Old town of Strasbourg on Rue du Vieux Marché aux Poissons, coming from Pont du Corbeau (picture from Christmas 2014)\nThree people were killed at the scene while 12 others were injured, 6 in critical condition. The dead were identified as a 45-year old male tourist from Thailand who was on holiday with his wife, a man from Strasbourg born in 1957 (age 60 or 61), and a man from Afghanistan who has been left brain-dead.\n\nAt least two of the injured were attached to the European Parliament: an Italian journalist from Europhonica who was part of the press packet for the sitting, and a French staffer. One of the soldiers who was involved in the shoot-out with Chekatt was injured.\n\nSuspect\nThe suspect, 29-year-old Strasbourg-born man of Moroccan heritage, Chérif Chekatt, was known to the security services in France, Germany and Switzerland for 27 petty crimes. After his release from prison in France in 2015, he received a prison sentence for theft in Singen, Germany, and was expelled to France after his release in 2017.\n\nHe was tagged with a fiche \"S\" (\"State Security\" file), a type of extra-judiciary document that French State security uses to keep trace of suspect individuals, for his recent \"religious radicalisation\". Neighbours note that whilst they believed Chekatt's older brother was a radicalised Muslim, he himself seemed quite ordinary. Laurent Nuñez, Secretary of State to the Interior Minister, explicitly stated that the suspect was known to have a terrorist character, but that whilst he became a terrorism apologist in prison was not expected to perform an attack. On the morning of the attack, local police attempted to arrest him in relation to another murder, but could not locate him at this time.\n\nAn investigation has been started for \"murder and acts of terrorism in relation to a criminal enterprise\". Four people close to the suspect were detained for questioning after the shooting.\n\nReactions\nPresident of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker and Prime Minister of Luxembourg Xavier Bettel reacted the same day on Twitter, expressing condolences; Juncker called Strasbourg \"a city of symbol of European peace and democracy\" and Bettel, a \"symbol of European values\". British Prime Minister Theresa May said that her \"thoughts are with all of those affected and with the French people\".\n\nThe French national security was raised to its highest, and border controls were increased due to Strasbourg's proximity to Germany. The Christmas market was closed on the day after the attack.\n\nSee also\n2016 Nice truck attack\nNovember 2015 Paris attacks\nStrasbourg Cathedral bombing plot\n", "date": "2018-12-12"}}
{"topic_id": "5", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Nigerian authorities respond to Boko Haram", "topic_description": "How have Nigerian authorities responded to attacks by the terrorist group known as Boko Haram?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "尼日利亚当局应对博科圣地组织", "topic_description": "尼日利亚当局如何应对名为博科圣地的恐怖组织的袭击？"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "مقامات نیجریه به بوکو حرام پاسخ", "topic_description": "چگونه مقامات نیجریه به حملات توسط گروه تروریستی شناخته شده به عنوان بوکو حرام پاسخ داده اند ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "尼日利亚对Boko Haram的授权", "topic_description": "尼日利亚人的权力如何被Boko Haram所吸引？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Нигерийские власти отреагировали на Боко Харам", "topic_description": "Каким образом нигерийские власти реагируют на нападения террористической группы, известной как \"Боко Харам\"?"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Mistaken bombing on refugee camp thought to be Boko Hararm, Correct attacks on Boko Haram, Talks of buying weapons from US President Trump specifically to deal with Boko Haram issue.", "somewhat_valuable": "None chosen", "not_that_valuable": "None chosen", "non_relevant": "Anything about kidnapped girls returning home or being found, suicide attacks that Boko Haram  conducted, articles that did not mention Boko Haram or Nigeria. "}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram_insurgency&oldid=880132285#History", "text": "On 7 January 2017, a group of Boko Haram militants attacked a Nigerian army base in Yobe State, killing five soldiers. In response, the Nigerian Army launched retaliatory strikes and killed 15 militants.\n\nOn 17 January 2017, a Nigerian Air Force jet accidentally bombed a refugee camp near the Cameroonian border in Rann, Borno State, mistaking it for a Boko Haram encampment. The airstrike left 115 people dead.\n\nOn 18 March 2017, at least six people were killed and 16 wounded after four female suicide bombers blew themselves up on the outskirts of Maiduguri city.\n\nOn 22 March 2017, the Nigerian Department of State Services (DSS) announced that a suspected member of Boko Haram had been arrested in northeastern Yobe State. The suspect confessed details of a plot to attack the American and British embassies, and other western targets in Abuja. The DSS also later announced that between 25 and 26 March 2017, five suspected members of Boko Haram had been arrested, thus thwarting the plot.\n\nOn 2 April 2017, the Nigerian military began what it said was its \"final offensive\" to retake Boko Haram's last strongholds.\n\nOn 17 May 2017, the Nigerian Army reported that it had arrested about 126 suspected Boko Haram terrorists at the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) camp in Damboa, Borno State.\nNigerian Army soldiers during counter-insurgency operations against Boko Haram in November 2017\n\nIn September 2017, Boko Haram militants kidnapped about 40 young adults, women and children and killed 18 in the town of Banki, 130 km southeast of Maiduguri, Borno State, on the border of Nigeria and Cameroon. Boko Haram was reported to have killed 380 people between April and September 2017 in the Lake Chad area . About 57% of all schools in Borno state were closed due to the Boko Haram insurgency, affecting the education of about 3 million children. ", "date": "2019-01-25"}}
{"topic_id": "6", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "fas", "rus"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Gibraltar's Sovereignty After Brexit", "topic_description": "How will Gibraltar's sovereignty be impacted by Brexit negotiations between Spain and the UK?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "直布罗陀在脱欧以后主权的情况", "topic_description": "西班牙与英国之间的脱欧谈判对直布罗陀主权有什么影响？"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "حق حاکمیت جبل الطارق پس از برگزیت", "topic_description": "حق حاکمیت جبل الطارق چه جوری از طریق مذاکرات برگزیت بین بریتانیا و اسپانیا تحت تأثیر خواهد گرفت؟"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "Суверенитет Гибралтара после Брексита", "topic_description": "Как на суверенитет Гибралтара повлияет на переговоры между Испанией и Великобританией по Brexit?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "حاکمیت جبل الطارق پس از برکسیت", "topic_description": "چگونه حاکمیت جبل الطارق توسط مذاکرات Brexit بین اسپانیا و انگلستان تحت تأثیر قرار خواهد گرفت ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Gustar的累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累累", "topic_description": "在英国和英国的Brexit negotiations中，G é altar的soverignty将如何受到影响？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Суверенитет Гибралтара после Брексита", "topic_description": "Как повлияют на суверенитет Гибралтара переговоры о Брексите между Испанией и Великобританией?"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Very valuable documents discuss the negotiations between the UK and Spain specifically regarding the status of Gibraltar, and the different possible scenarios for Gibraltar. Very valuable information also includes what residents of Gibraltar prefer, proposed plans between the UK and Spain for Gibraltar, and a brief history of the disagreement between the UK and Spain over Gibraltar and the main areas of disagreement specifically regarding Brexit.", "somewhat_valuable": "Somewhat valuable information references Gibraltar in the UK's Brexit negotiations and that the UK has a disagreement with Spain, but doesn't go into detail about it and doesn't mention what the implications are for Gibraltar if the UK exits the EU.", "not_that_valuable": "Information discussed Brexit negotiations between the UK and EU, but did not mention the issue of Gibraltar or disagreements with Spain.", "non_relevant": "Gibraltar was mentioned in regards to Brexit, but no details were provided and it was not the main part of the article."}, "fas": {"very_valuable": "In the event that the UK leaves the EU without an agreement, the shared border between Spain and Gibraltar will be disputed and the movement of Spanish citizens in this region, which they do daily, will become difficult. \n\n96% of Gibraltar's population voted to remain in the EU, but with Brexit, Gibraltar will leave the union along with the UK. ", "somewhat_valuable": "Without a guarantee of direct Spain-UK negotiations specific to the future of Gibraltar, Spain will oppose the Brexit proposal by the UK\n\nSpain is calling for the return of Gibraltar as a Spanish territory post-Brexit\n", "not_that_valuable": "N/A", "non_relevant": "N/A"}, "rus": {"very_valuable": "Gibraltar will remain a territory of the UK, but will maintain its current sovereignty and will vote for itself on whether or not to separate from the EU with Britain.", "somewhat_valuable": "Spain has threatened to veto the UK's Brexit proposal if Gibraltar's sovereignty in the decision to leave the EU is not addressed.", "not_that_valuable": "General information about Brexit negotiations", "non_relevant": "Gibraltar's soccer team won a tournament."}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Effect_of_Brexit_on_Gibraltar&oldid=870688779", "text": "Sovereignty\nSee also: Disputed status of Gibraltar\n\nThe day after the result, Spain's acting Foreign Minister, José Manuel García-Margallo, renewed calls for joint Spanish–British control of the peninsula. These calls were strongly rebuffed by Gibraltar's Chief Minister. After the result Spain reiterated its position that it wanted to jointly govern Gibraltar with the United Kingdom and said it would seek to block Gibraltar from participating in talks over future deals between the UK and EU.\n\nIn April 2017, British Prime Minister Theresa May reiterated that \"the UK would seek the best possible deal for Gibraltar as the UK exits the EU, and there would be no negotiation on the sovereignty of Gibraltar without the consent of its people.” \n\nIn April 2018, Spanish Foreign Minister Alfonso Dastis announced that Spain hoped to sign off a bilateral agreement with Britain over Gibraltar before October so as not to hinder a Brexit transition deal. Talks between London and Madrid had progressed well. While reiterating the Spanish long-term aim of \"recovering\" Gibraltar, he said that Spain would not hold Gibraltar as a \"hostage\" to the EU negotiations. ", "date": "2018-11-26"}}
{"topic_id": "7", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Russia Spying in U.S.", "topic_description": "Russian espionage in the United States of America"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "俄罗斯在美国从事的间谍活动", "topic_description": "俄罗斯在美国的间谍活动"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "روسیه جاسوسی در آمریکا", "topic_description": "جاسوسی روسیه در ایالات متحده آمریکا"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "روسیه جاسوسی در ایالات متحده", "topic_description": "جاسوسی روسی در ایالات متحده آمریکا"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "俄罗斯间谍在美国", "topic_description": "俄罗斯在美利坚合众国的间谍活动"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Россия Шпионаж в США", "topic_description": "Российский шпионаж в США"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Russian Maria Butina was arrested on charges of espionage and she was very active in the US lobbying organization, the NRA.", "somewhat_valuable": "None", "not_that_valuable": "None", "non_relevant": "Not useful were articles on Chinese espionage, US espionage in Brazil, school shootings where the NRA is frowned upon, Accusations of Manafort looking to Russia to help Trump win the election."}, "fas": {"very_valuable": "Information on a particular Russian spy operating in the U.S.", "somewhat_valuable": "An article briefly mentioning Russia hacking a U.S. company to steal info, but not much detail provided; and/or articles about Russia demanding the release of the aforementioned Russian spy (but not much information about the spy's espionage activities)", "not_that_valuable": "U.S. and Russia exchanging detained spies from their respective countries", "non_relevant": "Most of the Russian hacking articles, particularly regarding U.S. presidential elections, I left as not-central. While sometimes hacking is considered espionage, in the majority of these cases, it was more of a cyber attack or sabotage rather than espionage. There was at least one instance where Russian hacking of U.S. information did constitute espionage, as the intent/outcome was to steal information, so I marked that article as central."}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russian_espionage_in_the_United_States&oldid=846268438", "text": "Russian espionage in the United States has occurred since at least during the Cold War, by the Soviet Union, and likely well before. According to United States government, by 2007 it had reached Cold War levels.\n\n\nContents\n1\tOperations\n1.1\tEspionage\n1.2\tElectronic espionage\n2\tExpulsion of intelligence agents\n3\tSee also\n4\tReferences\nOperations\nEspionage\nAccording to former Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) Colonel Stanislav Lunev, \"SVR and GRU (Russia's political and military intelligence agencies, respectively) are operating against the U.S. in a much more active manner than they were during even the hottest days of the Cold War.\" From the end of the 1980s, KGB and later SVR began to create \"a second echelon\" of \"auxiliary agents in addition to our main weapons, illegals and special agents\", according to former SVR officer Kouzminov. These agents are legal immigrants, including scientists and other professionals. Another SVR officer who defected to Britain in 1996 described details about thousand Russian agents and intelligence officers, some of them \"illegals\" who live under deep cover abroad.\n\nElectronic espionage\nIn April 2015, CNN reported that \"Russian hackers\" had \"penetrated sensitive parts of the White House\" computers in \"recent months.\" It was said that the FBI, the Secret Service, and other U.S. intelligence agencies categorized the attacks \"among the most sophisticated attacks ever launched against U.S. government systems.\"\n\nExpulsion of intelligence agents\nPresident Donald Trump ordered the expulsion of 60 Russian intelligence and diplomatic staff from the United States following the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal. The closure of the consulate in Seattle, Washington was also ordered, based on the belief of US intelligence officials that the consulate was serving as a key base of operations for the Russian intelligence operations in the US.", "date": "2018-06-17"}}
{"topic_id": "8", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Russia airliners crash causes", "topic_description": "What factors cause airliners in Russia to crash?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "俄罗斯班机坠毁的原因", "topic_description": "俄罗斯班机坠毁的原因是什么？"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "دلایل سقوط خطوط هوائی روسی", "topic_description": "چه عواملی باعث سقوط خطوط هوائی در روسیه می شود"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "علل سقوط هواپیماهای مسافربری روسیه", "topic_description": "چه عواملی باعث سقوط هواپیماهای مسافربری در روسیه می ‌ شود ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "俄罗斯航空公司坠毁的原因", "topic_description": "什么东西会诱使俄罗斯的航空客机坠毁？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Причины аварий российских авиалайнеров", "topic_description": "Какие факторы приводят к аварийному падению авиалайнеров в России?"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Crashes that dealt with Russian airliners, explanations about plane crashes, ", "somewhat_valuable": "Russian airliner planes that emergency landed and then ultimately exploded or crashed, Chinese airliner emergency landing in Russia.", "not_that_valuable": "NA", "non_relevant": "Talked about a crash in a different country, different country's airliner, airliner's of other nations emergency landing, "}, "fas": {"very_valuable": "i chose articles that explicitly stated a cause for the crash, like \"technical difficulties\" or \"pilot error\" or \"aging aircraft\" or  but i rejected articles that said \"terrorist attacks were rejected as the cause\"; if the article said that \"all options were being investigated\", i also rejected those; i rejected crashes of military RU planes since the topic explicitly stated \"airliners\"; i also rejected all planes that were shot down (because if i didn't there would have been a whole lot more articles, but technically speaking, being \"shot down\" IS a factor in causing a plane to crash)", "somewhat_valuable": "some articles had press early reporting speculating on the crash cause, i called these \"somewhat valuable\" since as an analyst i would be looking for a definitive proven cause vs. simply what some reporter believed the cause was without any official statement from an investigative body, but early press reports are at least somewhat indicative of what probably caused the event, hence \"somewhat\" valuable", "not_that_valuable": "non-russian airline crashes (like the Indonesian jet going down in Indian ocean); articles that only reported the fact of the crash but no info on what probable or proven causes were; articles focused on casualty numbers, finding black boxes, military jets being shot down, or even accidental shoot downs of passenger jets,  etc -> all of these were rejected outright", "non_relevant": "some article said what causes were rejected as the crash cause (terrorism) and that is very close to \"central\" but i ended up rejecting all that because as an analyst, knowing what the cause isn't does not help me write my report on what the cause IS"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_Russia&diff=821979390&oldid=690929209", "text": "Investigation\n\nImmediately after the crash, the Investigative Committee of Russia launched a criminal case to probe the cause.\n\nBy 27 December, the cockpit voice and flight data recorders had been located, and both were later recovered and sent to Moscow for analysis. By 28 December, the bodies of 18 people had been recovered from the sea. On 29 December, a third recorder, which backs up data from the CVR and FDR, was found, which, despite being damaged, might reveal more information.\n\nOne Russian official downplayed the possibility of a terrorist attack as the cause of the crash, focusing more on the possibility of mechanical or human error. Following the crash, all Tupolev Tu-154 aircraft in Russia were grounded.\n\nA bright flash was purportedly caught on surveillance cameras along the Sochi coastline before the crash. Witnesses told reporters the plane appeared to experience trouble in gaining altitude, turned 180 degrees, started descending and crashed into the sea.\n\nOn 27 December it was reported that an investigative source had told the Interfax news agency that Russian investigators believed a fault with the aircraft flaps had caused the crash. The Life.ru news portal was reported to have obtained a recording of the last words of one of the pilots: \"Commander, we are going down.\" There was no official confirmation.\n\nOn 29 December it was announced by the Flight Safety Service of the Russian Ministry that a preliminary analysis of data from the cockpit voice recorder showed that no explosion had occurred on board.\n\nOn 16 January the Interstate Aviation Committee, the civil authority in aviation accident investigation, has announced that its representative would participate in the investigation.\n\nOn 19 January Interfax reported that, during underwater search for the Tu-154 fragments, remains had also been found of a Soviet Douglas A-20 Havoc/DB-7 Boston bomber, supplied from the US through the Lend-Lease agreement, which crashed on 15 November 1942.\n\nOn 31 May 2017, Russia's Kommersant said all the evidence pointed to the pilot, Maj Roman Volkov having suffered from somatogravic illusion. Analysis of the flight data suggested that the pilot had \"lost his bearings and ignored his instruments, believing that the jet was climbing too sharply.\" Tiredness was thought to be a factor. Experts said that he was already feeling unwell on the ground and had trouble getting the plane on to the correct runway. ", "date": "2018-03-24"}}
{"topic_id": "9", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Mediterranean migrants drownings", "topic_description": "What information is available concerning migrants drowning while attempting to cross the Mediterranean Sea?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "地中海移民淹死", "topic_description": "有什么关于试图横渡地中海而淹死的移民可用的信息？"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "مهاجران مدیترانه غرق", "topic_description": "‏ هنگام تلاش برای عبور از دریای مدیترانه ، ‏ چه اطلاعاتی در مورد غرق شدن مهاجران موجود است ؟ ‏"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "地中海移民溺水", "topic_description": "有哪些信息可供选择的移民溺水到地中海横渡？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Средиземноморские мигранты утопают", "topic_description": "Какая информация имеется о мигрантах, утопающих при попытке пересечь Средиземное море?"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Gave circumstances and specific numbers of migrants who most likely died by drowning in the Mediterranean Sea.", "somewhat_valuable": "Talked about deaths of migrants crossing the Mediterranean Sea, but unclear if deaths were caused by drowning or other causes (starvation, dehydration, etc). ", "not_that_valuable": "Brought up the issue of migrants that crossed the Mediterranean Sea that might give background to the issue, but nothing about deaths. ", "non_relevant": "Spoke on very peripheral issues of migrants that crossed the Mediterranean, but nothing that would significantly add to the story or background. Examples are European Union decisions on who will harbor migrants, etc. "}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SOS_M%C3%A9diterran%C3%A9e&oldid=867294859", "text": "European migration\n\nThe organization is best known for its actions during the European migrant crisis of rescuing migrants from sinking vessels in and around Libyan territorial waters and providing their passengers safe transport to European ports. Since the start of the rescue operation in 2015, the Aquarius has saved more than 9000 lives. They are considered a \"taxi service for migrants\" by Italian Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini and have been denied entry to Italy and Malta. They are closely associated with another French organisation, Doctors Without Borders. SOS Méditerranée clashed with Libyan coastguards during 2017 for their failure to \"respect Libyan sovereignty\" but have since reached compromise to operate within their waters.\nNetwork\n\nSOS Méditerranée works as a European association with teams in Germany, France, Italy and Switzerland in a European network, jointly financing and operating the rescue ship Aquarius, which has been in continuous operation since February 2016 in international waters between Italy and Libya.\n\nThe medical care has been provided by Doctors without Borders since May 2016. ", "date": "2018-11-04"}}
{"topic_id": "10", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho", "fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Trump's withdrawal from TPP", "topic_description": "Why did President Trump sign a presidential memorandum to withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "特朗普退出TPP", "topic_description": "特朗普总统为何签署将美国从《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》（TPP）中撤出的总统备忘录？"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "خروج ترامپ از تی پی پی", "topic_description": "چرا رئیس جمهور ترامپ تفاهم نامه ریاست جمهوری را برای خروج ایالات متحده از مشارکت ترانس اقیانوس آرام (تی پی پی) امضا کرد؟"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "خروج ترامپ از TPP", "topic_description": "چرا پرزیدنت ترامپ تفاهم ‌ نامه ‌ ای را امضا کرد تا آمریکا را از مشارکت Trans-Pacific (TPP) عقب ‌ نشینی کند ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "TPP中的王牌", "topic_description": "为什么杜普总统要从跨太平洋伙伴关系（TPP）中退出美国？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Выход Трампа из ТЭС", "topic_description": "Почему президент Трамп подписал президентский меморандум о выводе США из Транстихоокеанского партнерства (ТЭС)?"}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "An article with detailed reason for President Trump's withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP), such as the large trade deficit with the U.S. and Japan, especially in the area of automobile import and export.  ", "somewhat_valuable": "Several articles with brief statements on why President Trump decided to withdraw the U.S. from the TTP. ", "not_that_valuable": "Several articles with information that point to the possible reasons for President Trump's decision of TTP withdrawal.  ", "non_relevant": "Multiple articles reported President Trump signing an executive order for U.S. withdrawal from the TTP along with U.S., European, China, and Japan's reactions to the withdrawal.  Yet these articles provided no reason of the withdrawal.   "}, "fas": {"very_valuable": "Specific reasons why Trump left TPP are listed in article", "somewhat_valuable": "Article mentions that Trump's withdrawal from the TPP was to fulfill an election promise but doesn't specify the reasoning beyond that", "not_that_valuable": "NA", "non_relevant": "NA"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trans-Pacific_Partnership&oldid=757529706", "text": "United States\nSee also: Fast track (trade)\n\nMost international agreements in the United States are approved using Trade Promotion Authority (also called fast track) authorization, in which the US congress is required to hold a yes/no vote on any agreements without modification. The US passed a law agreeing to this fast-track procedure in 2015.\n\nThe terms of the TPA stipulate that when a deal is formally submitted to Congress, they must act within 90 legislative days. According to Politico, many expect Congress to vote on the bill either during the summer of 2016 or in the lame-duck session after the 2016 elections. However, in August 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) stated that the vote will not occur that year but added, \"It will still be around. It can be massaged, changed, worked on during the next administration.\"\n\nUnited States' ratification of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal does not seem likely following the United States' presidential election resulting in Donald Trump's victory. He vowed to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership once in office. According to the President-Elect, Trans-Pacific Partnership would cost American workers their jobs by \"[undermining] our economy...[and undermining] our independence\". The Republican Party also retained its legislative majority, it has been reported[by whom?] that \"Republicans have little incentive to bring the TPP to a vote, since Mr. Trump could easily threaten to unravel the deal when he takes office and block its implementation, as well as punish lawmakers who vote for it\". Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said \"no\" when asked if the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal \"would be considered in the [current] lame-duck Congress\".\nContents\nQuestion book-new.svg\n\t\nThis section may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (July 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)\n\tWikisource has original text related to this article:\nWhat Is the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)?\n\nA version of the text of the agreement \"subject to legal review\" was released by prospective member parties on 5 November 2015. Portions of drafts of the full agreement were previously leaked to the public. Many of the provisions in the leaked documents are modeled on previous trade agreements.[citation needed]\n\nThe contents of the TPP go far beyond the standards drafted by the World Trade Organization. The TPP includes a negative-list of all sectors covered for the liberalizing trade, except for those clearly stated. The TPP includes new regulation for online commerce, treatment of foreign investors, far more comprehensive protection for intellectual property, labor codes, and an agreement for neutrality regarding state-owned enterprises.\n\nA 2016 study by University of Maryland political scientists Todd Allee and Andrew Lugg finds that out of the 74 previous trade agreements that TPP members signed since 1995, the text of the TPP most resembles that from earlier U.S. trade agreements. ", "date": "2016-12-31"}}
{"topic_id": "11", "languages_with_qrels": ["zho"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "UK Defense Secretary leaking Huawei information", "topic_description": "Find information about UK Prime Minister Theresa May firing Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson for leaking information about a Huawei deal from a National Security Council meeting."}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "英国防大臣泄露华为情报", "topic_description": "查找与英国首相特蕾莎·梅将国防大臣加文·威廉姆森因泄露国家安全委员会会议有关华为交易情报而解职的相关信息。"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "وزیر دفاع بریتانیا نشت اطلاعات هواوی", "topic_description": "اطلاعات در مورد نخست وزیر بریتانیا ترزا می شلیک وزیر دفاع گاوین ویلیامسون برای نشت اطلاعات در مورد یک معامله هواوی از یک جلسه شورای امنیت ملی."}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "英国国防信息泄露华威", "topic_description": "寻找有关英国总理Theresa May firing Defense的信息，以了解国家安全委员会会议上关于Huawei交易的信息。"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Министр обороны Великобритании утечка информации Huawei", "topic_description": "Найдите информацию о премьер-министре Великобритании Терезе Мэй, уволившей министра обороны Гэвина Уильямсона за утечку информации о сделке Huawei с заседания Совета национальной безопасности."}], "narratives": {"zho": {"very_valuable": "Specific reasons UK Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson was fired", "somewhat_valuable": "General information about the Huawei controversy", "not_that_valuable": "documents about the UK decision on Huawei 5G", "non_relevant": "documents about Huawei"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gavin_Williamson&oldid=891214674", "text": "In December 2018, Williamson expressed \"grave\" and \"very deep concerns\" about the Chinese telecommunications company Huawei providing technology to upgrade Britain's services to 5G. He accused China of acting \"sometimes in a malign way\". China's Defence Ministry spokesman Wu Qian criticized Williamson’s comments, saying \"The remarks just reinforced the deep-rooted ignorance, prejudice and anxiety among some British people.\"\n\nOn 11 February 2019 Williamson delivered the speech \"Defence in Global Britain\" at the Royal United Services Institute outlining the future direction of the U.K. Armed Forces. The speech, which amongst a number of themes presented therein, proposes an increased role of the British military in the Indo-Pacific via the introduction of new and additional assets, including the F-35 carrying HMS Queen Elizabeth, was met with the consternation of the Chinese Government, leading Chinese Vice Premier Hu Chunhua to cancel trade talks with Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond. Hammond later stated that \"no decisions have been made or even discussed about where [the aircraft carrier's] early deployments might be. And when those decisions are made, they will be made in the National Security Council.\"\n\nCritics of Williamson's approach to his Defence Secretary role have compared him to Private Pike, a hapless and immature character in the popular sitcom Dad's Army. ", "date": "2019-04-06"}}
{"topic_id": "12", "languages_with_qrels": ["fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "South Korea pursuing free trade agreements", "topic_description": "What free trade agreements are South Korea pursuing, with what countries and for what products?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "کره جنوبی توافق نامه تجارت آزاد را دنبال می کند", "topic_description": "کره جنوبی چه توافقنامه های تجارت آزاد را دنبال می کند ، با چه کشورهایی و برای چه محصولاتی؟"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "کره جنوبی به دنبال توافقنامه تجارت آزاد", "topic_description": "چه توافقنامه تجارت آزاد کره جنوبی دنبال, با چه کشورها و برای چه محصولات?"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "韩国追求自由的交易协议", "topic_description": "韩国有什么自由的交易协议，有什么是免费的，有什么是免费的，有什么是免费的，有什么是免费的？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Южная Корея стремится к заключению соглашений о свободной торговле", "topic_description": "Какие соглашения о свободной торговле преследуют Южная Корея, с какими странами и для каких продуктов?"}], "narratives": {"fas": {"very_valuable": "Who South Korea has established a free trade agreement with and what specific products the partners have agreed to trade", "somewhat_valuable": "Who South Korea has been partnering with or who they have been in talks with to create a free trade agreement", "not_that_valuable": "Information regarding the current state of free trade across the world, which includes South Korea", "non_relevant": "Descriptions about the relationship development between North and South Korea"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_relations_of_South_Korea&oldid=813151924#Free_Trade_Agreement", "text": "South Korea has the following trade agreements:\n\nKorea-ASEAN (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam) FTA\nKorea-Australia FTA\nKorea-Canada CKFTA FTA\nKorea-Chile FTA\nKorea-China FTA\nKorea-Colombia FTA\nKorea-EFTA (Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway, Switzerland) FTA\nKorea-EU (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK) FTA\nKorea-India CEPA FTA\nKorea-New Zealand FTA\nKorea-Peru FTA\nKorea-Singapore FTA\nKorea-Turkey FTA\nKorea-United States of America KORUS FTA\nKorea-Vietnam FTA\nAs of late 2016 countries of Central America (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay), GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council—Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates), Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, MERCOSUR (Southern Common Market—Mercado comun del sur), Mexico, Mongolia, RCEP (Asian 10 Countries, Korea, China, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, India), Russia (BEPA), SACU (South Asia Cooperation Union) and Korea-China-Japan are in negotiations about the FTA with the Republic of Korea.\n\nSince the late 1980s, the country has instead sought to establish an American partnership, which has made the Seoul–Washington relationship subject to severe strains. Trade had become a serious source of friction between the two countries. In 1989, the United States was South Korea's largest and most important trading partner and South Korea was the seventh-largest market for United States goods and the second largest market for its agricultural products.\n\nn 1968, South Korea obliged the mutual defense treaty, by sending a large combat troop contingent to support the United States in the Vietnam War. The U.S. Eighth Army, Seventh Air Force, and U.S. Naval Forces Korea are stationed in South Korea. The two nations have strong economic, diplomatic, and military ties, although they have at times disagreed with regard to policies towards North Korea, and with regard to some of South Korea's industrial activities that involve usage of rocket or nuclear technology. There had also been strong anti-American sentiment during certain periods, which has largely moderated in the modern day.", "date": "2017-12-02"}}
{"topic_id": "13", "languages_with_qrels": ["rus"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "US-South Korea Trade Agreement", "topic_description": "How will South Korea benefit from or be harmed by renegotiating a free trade agreement with the United States?"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "США-Южнокорейское торговое соглашение", "topic_description": "Как Южная Корея выиграет или пострадает от переговоров о соглашении о свободной торговле с Соединенными Штатами?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "توافقنامه تجارت ایالات متحده و کره جنوبی", "topic_description": "چگونه کره جنوبی با مذاکره مجدد با ایالات متحده سود می برد یا آسیب می بیند ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "美韩贸易协议", "topic_description": "韩国将如何通过重新谈判与美国达成自由协议来摆脱或受到伤害？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Торговое соглашение между США и Южной Кореей", "topic_description": "Каким образом Южная Корея извлечет выгоду из соглашения о свободной торговле с Соединенными Штатами или пострадает от него?"}], "narratives": {"rus": {"very_valuable": "N/A", "somewhat_valuable": "Details of how South Korean products and services would be or were impacted by renegotiating the trade deal with the US. Specifically about steel, solar panels, dishwashers, cars; specific tariff percentages; details of how South Korean exports to the US increased or decreased since the renegotiation and how they compared to the previous trade deal; details about how Korean jobs would be gained or lost with the new trade agreement", "not_that_valuable": "Mention of the renegotiation without any details; vague or unsubstantiated assumptions about how the renegotiation would impact South Korea; mention of diplomats traveling to South Korea to negotiate the new agreement", "non_relevant": "Any trade agreements outside of the US and South Korean one; US diplomatic relations with other countries, US/Korean relations outside of this renegotiation, nuclear negations with North Korea, anti-dumping tariffs imposed on Korea, broad US tariffs, general tariffs against Asian products without being country specific, Korean sanctions against US, China/Korea criticize US trade policy, general stats on Korean trade, Korean military news, US-Korean military relations "}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States%E2%80%93Korea_Free_Trade_Agreement&oldid=826698848", "text": "South Korea reactions\n\t\nThis section is in list format, but may read better as prose. You can help by converting this section, if appropriate. Editing help is available. (May 2016)\n\t\nThis section contains a pro and con list, which is sometimes inappropriate. Please help improve it by integrating both sides into a more neutral presentation, or remove this template if you feel that such a list is appropriate for this article. (May 2016)\n\nAs it does in the United States, the FTA proves a highly divisive issue in Korea. Opposition arguments tend to focus on perceived disparities in the agreement as well as public opinion. Advocates tend to focus on economic predictions.\nOpponents\n\n    The Korea Rural Economic Institute predicts that U.S. agricultural exports to South Korea, currently $2.8 billion, could double after the FTA, causing the loss of up to 130,000 jobs.\n    Citizens' groups worried about transparency, the environment and labor standards say the deal was deficient as it was agreed on behind closed doors. The South Korean government, for example, has not allowed open, public debate about the FTA's impact on the nation's economy and sovereignty. The Korean Advertising Broadcasting Agency blocked the running of an advertisement produced by farmers protesting the deal. \"Should the FTA become law after an undemocratic process and in spite of mass popular opposition, the FTA will drive the perception in South Korea that America's democratic rhetoric is merely a cover for profit-seeking behavior\", Korean Americans for Fair Trade said.\n    Baek Il, professor of Commercial Distribution Studies at Ulsan College, protested against the free trade agreement as \"a destruction of the South Korean domestic manufacturing industry\" in 2006 and in 2011.\n    Several massive protests against the FTA have taken place in the country. A nationwide protest on November 22, 2006, reportedly drew 65,000 to 80,000 people, with 9,000 to 20,000 of them gathering at the city hall in Seoul. A protester named Heo Se-uk set himself on fire Sunday shouting \"Stop the Korea-U.S. FTA\" outside the hotel where negotiators were meeting. He was being treated for third-degree burns, police said. The overall opinion of the population has fluctuated over time and is difficult to gauge.\n    Other polls indicated a majority opposed to the agreement, including an 83% no confidence rating in the government's ability to negotiate the agreement. The Lee Myung-bak administration has taken considerable political heat for its part in advancing the FTA, as did the previous Roh Moo-hyun administration. President Lee had to endure months of protests over the decision to reopen American beef imports, a decision that was made primarily with an eye towards securing American support for the FTA.\n    Agriculture in South Korea is expected to be adversely affected, and $119 billion in aid to South Korean farmers has been announced over the next ten years to offset the effects of the finalized agreement.\n    Fifteen anti-KORUS FTA university students were arrested in front of the Blue House fountain on December 10, 2011.\n    Around 100 people who work the domestic beef industry protested against the Lee Myung-bak government in Jeonju on January 5, 2012, as the authorities are alleged to abandon the South Korean farmers in favor of American beef.\n\nAdvocates\n\n    South Korean public companies receive opportunities for privatization.\n    The Korea Institute for International Economic Policy estimates that exports to the United States will rise by 12% per year, or $5.4 billion, and grow by 15% in the longer run.\n    Proponents of the FTA cite that it will create more jobs than the ones destroyed, and will be, on the long term, beneficial for the country.\n    Business groups welcomed the news that South Korea concluded the free trade agreement with the U.S. business leaders stressed the importance of smoothly implementing the next steps, including ratifying the agreement in the National Assembly of South Korea.\n    Lee Hee-beom, the chairman of the Korea International Trade Association (KITA) declared that \"This is our country's first step in its endeavor to join the group of advanced economies\", adding that \"the government should work out measures to compensate those who might suffer from the market opening and continue the restructuring process. The National Assembly should ratify the FTA as soon as possible so that the negotiations will show results quickly.\" Similar statements were made by the Federation of Korean Industries: \"With the successful conclusion of the FTA talks with the U.S. as momentum, this agreement will upgrade the traditional alliance with the United States to a higher level, and greatly help our enterprises advance into the US\".\n    The Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry said, \"We should view the FTA from the broad standpoint of promoting national interests rather than the interests of specific industries or groups\".\n    The free trade agreement is expected to increase the growth rate of the South Korean GDP by 0.6% per year for the next 10 years. The South Korean government also cite increased foreign direct investment in Korea and heightened competition.\n    The trade accord will knock down tariff and non-tariff barriers between the world's largest and 11th-largest economies, which did US$74 billion in two-way trade in 2006.", "date": "2018-02-20"}}
{"topic_id": "14", "languages_with_qrels": ["fas", "rus"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "North Korean Earthquakes and Nuclear Testing", "topic_description": "Are earthquakes in North Korea being caused by nuclear testing?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "زمین لرزه ها و آزمایش های هسته ای کره شمالی", "topic_description": "آیا زمین لرزه ها در کره شمالی ناشی از آزمایش هسته ای است؟"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "Северокорейские землетрясения и ядерное испытание", "topic_description": "Являются ли землетрясения в Северной Корее следствием ядерных испытаний?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "زلزله های کره شمالی و آزمایش هسته ای", "topic_description": "آیا زمین لرزه در کره شمالی توسط آزمایش هسته ای ایجاد می شود ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "North Korean Earthquakes和Nesting", "topic_description": "朝鲜的地震是否被核试验所吸引？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Северокорейские землетрясения и ядерные испытания", "topic_description": "Являются ли землетрясения в Северной Корее причиной ядерных испытаний?"}], "narratives": {"fas": {"very_valuable": "Articles that were solely about both the nuclear testing and subsequent earthquakes. ", "somewhat_valuable": "Articles where other countries were accusing/asserting that the earthquakes must have been caused by the nuclear testing. ", "not_that_valuable": "Articles that did not center around the topic/description and which only briefly mentioned the testing/earthquake, typically at the end of the article. ", "non_relevant": "Only one article where Japan stated what it WOULD do IF the earthquakes were caused by nuclear testing."}, "rus": {"very_valuable": "N/A", "somewhat_valuable": "Seismic data from multiple countries or international consensus that the earthquakes in the DPRK were caused by nuclear testing. Specific metrics as to depth, epicenter and strength of earthquakes associated with nuclear testing", "not_that_valuable": "Initial reporting or assumptions that earthquakes felt in DPRK were caused by nuclear testing; when only one or two countries report on the earthquakes and claim it \"may\" be due to nuclear testing", "non_relevant": "US response to DPRK nuclear aggression; reports of natural earthquakes (including those that occurred at the nuclear test site); the nuclear tests without mention of seismic activity; reports of North Korean nuclear test sites, including closures; UN session about DPRK nuclear aggression; sanctions against the DPRK; nuclear and weapons programs of other countries"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2017%E2%80%932018_North_Korea_crisis&oldid=801915881#Sixth_nuclear_test_(since_2006)_and_aftermath:_September_2017", "text": "On 3 September, at 3:31 AM UTC, the United States Geological Survey reported that it had detected a magnitude 6.3 earthquake in North Korea near the Punggye-ri test site. Given the shallow depth of the quake and its proximity to North Korea's primary nuclear weapons testing facility, experts concluded that the country had conducted a sixth nuclear weapon test since the country first exploded a nuclear device in 2006. North Korea claimed that they had tested a hydrogen bomb capable of being mounted on an ICBM. The independent seismic monitoring agency NORSAR estimated that the blast had a yield of around 120 kilotons. An official KCNA statement of 3 September, also claimed North Korea’s ability to conduct a “super-powerful EMP attack”.\n\nOn the same day, U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis speaking on behalf of the White House, warned there would be \"a massive military response\" to any threat from North Korea against the United States, including Guam, or its allies.\n\nEarly on 4 September, the Republic of Korea (South Korea) conducted a ballistic missile exercise that involved the South's Hyunmoo ballistic missile and the F-15K fighter jets, which was billed to be in response to North's detonation. The state news agency Yonhap said the South's military had carried out a live-fire exercise simulating an attack on the North's nuclear site, hitting \"designated targets in the East Sea\".\n\nOn the same day, the UN Security Council convened to discuss further measures against North Korea; the leaked draft the relevant UNSC resolution prepared by the U.S. was said to call for an oil embargo on North Korea, ban on the country's exports of textiles, on the hiring of North Korean workers abroad as well as personal sanctions against Kim Jong-un. Despite resistance from China and Russia, the United States on 8 September formally requested a vote of the United Nations Security Council on the U.S. resolution. UNSC 2375 passed on 11 September as a significantly watered-down version of the United States' request.\n\nOn 6 September, Donald Trump, after a telephone conversation with China′s Xi Jinping, said that the United States would not tolerate North Korea′s provocations, although military action was not his \"first choice\".\n\nMissile test over Japan on 15 September\nOn 14 September, North Korea issued a threat to \"sink\" Japan, and turn the US to \"ashes and darkness\". The statement drew strong condemnation from Yoshihide Suga, who described the speech as \"extremely provocative and egregious\". The next day, an IRBM was fired from near Pyongyang and flew over Hokkaido, Japan before splashing down in the western Pacific about two thousand kilometers off Cape Erimo at about 7:16 AM local time.\n\nThe missile traveled 3,700 kilometres (2,300 mi) achieving a maximum apogee of 770 kilometres (480 mi) during its 19 minute flight. It is the furthest any North Korean IRBM missile has gone above and beyond Japan.  On 18 September, North Korea announced that any further sanctions would only cause acceleration of their nuclear program.\n\nU.S. and China agree on ″pressure″\nOn 18 September, the White House said president Donald Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping had discussed North Korea’s continued nuclear weapons and ballistic missile tests and committed to “maximising pressure on North Korea through vigorous enforcement” of UN Security Council resolutions on North Korea; North Korea said the sanctions would accelerate its nuclear programme.", "date": "2017-09-22"}}
{"topic_id": "20", "languages_with_qrels": ["fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Italian coast guard response to Mediterranean migrants", "topic_description": "How is Italy's coast guard responding to the migrants attempting to cross the Mediterranean Sea?"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "واکنش گارد ساحلی ایتالیا در برابر مهاجران مدیترانه", "topic_description": "گارد ساحلی ایتالیا چهگونه واکنش می دهد در برابر مهاجرانی که سعی عبور دریای مدیترانه میکنند؟"}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "پاسخ گارد ساحلی ایتالیا به مهاجران مدیترانه ای", "topic_description": "چگونه گارد ساحلی ایتالیا به مهاجران در تلاش برای عبور از دریای مدیترانه واکنش نشان می ‌ دهد ؟"}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "意大利对地中海移民的反应", "topic_description": "意大利的鳕鱼是如何对迁徙到地中海的移民做出反应的？"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Реакция итальянской береговой охраны на средиземноморских мигрантов", "topic_description": "Как береговая охрана Италии реагирует на мигрантов, пытающихся пересечь Средиземное море?"}], "narratives": {"fas": {"very_valuable": "-In May 2017 Italy was accused of allowing the drowning of  refugees trying to cross the Mediterranean and destined for Europe. The report cited 2013 audio footage of refugees calling Italian naval authorities for help and authorities turning the refugees away, stating that the vessel they were aboard was closer to Malta\n-The public blames ltaly's inaction for the sinking of the vessel and death of dozens\n-In March 2017 Italian Coast Guard officials reported the rescues of 1300 refugees from the Mediterranean in 13 separate rescue operations\n-In 2018 new Italian administration begins pushing back, fines civilian rescue ships, gives more clout to the security/coast guard forces, arrests the German captain of one such vessel for docking without permission\n-Tensions rise within the EU, neighboring countries", "somewhat_valuable": "-Brief references to Italy's new hardline government stance on the situation and tensions with Malta and other EU countries\n-Reports that Italy is still reluctantly running rescue operations but the fate of the refugees is unclear\n-Reports not focused on Italy's efforts indicating that Spain is becoming the more crucial port of entry and other EU countries are pledging to welcome certain amounts of refugees\n-Reports that indicate Italy is working with the EU to come up with a budget and plan to deal with crisis", "not_that_valuable": "-Brief, undetailed reports from Italian Coast Guard citing rescue stats\n-The Italian Coast Guard calls the refugee situation a crisis, citing a specific event in which 20 people lost their lives\n-Italian government threatens to pull back funding for the refugee crisis if aid is not provided from other countries (Malta, France, Spain)\n-Coast guard vessel utilized in multi-national effort to transport refugees to Valencia, Spain", "non_relevant": "-Report focused on German captain detained by Italian Coast Guard, focused on efforts to secure her releast\n-Report focused on above captains vessel, the Sea Watch"}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_immigration_to_Europe&oldid=865282890#Illegal_immigration", "text": "Illegal immigration from Africa to Europe is significant. Many people from underdeveloped African countries embark on the dangerous journey for Europe, in hopes of a better life. In parts of Africa, particularly Mauritania and Morocco, trafficking of immigrants to Europe has become more lucrative than drug trafficking. Some migrants die during the journey. Most of those whose claim for asylum were unsuccessful are deported back to Africa. Libya is the major departure point for irregular migrants setting off for Europe.\n\nBetween October 2013 and October 2014, the Italian government ran Operation Mare Nostrum, a naval and air operation intended to reduce irregular immigration to Europe and the incidence of migratory ship wreckages off the coast of Lampedusa. The Italian government ceased the operation as it was judged to be unsustainable, involving a large proportion of the Italian navy. The operation was replaced by a more limited joint EU border protection operation, named Operation Triton managed by the EU border agency, Frontex. Some other European governments, including Britain's, argued that the operations such as Mare Nostrum and Triton serve to provide an \"unintended pull factor\" encouraging further migration.\n\nIn 2014, 170,100 irregular migrants were recorded arriving in Italy by sea (an increase from 42,925 arrivals recorded in 2013), 141,484 of them leaving from Libya. Most of them came from Syria, the Horn of Africa and West Africa.\n\nThe issue returned to international headlines with a series of migrant shipwrecks, part of the 2015 Mediterranean migration crisis. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimates suggest that between the start of 2015 and the middle of April, 21,000 migrants had reached the Italian coast and 900 migrants had died in the Mediterranean. Critics of European policy towards irregular migration in the Mediterranean argue that the cancellation of Operation Mare Nostrum failed to deter migrants and that its replacement with Triton \"created the conditions for the higher death toll.\"", "date": "2018-10-22"}}
{"topic_id": "23", "languages_with_qrels": ["fas"], "topics": [{"lang": "eng", "source": "original", "topic_title": "Technical US-South Korean Military Exercise", "topic_description": "Find information regarding technical or computer-related military exercises that took place after the original U.S. and North Korean summit."}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "human translation", "topic_title": "رزمایش فنی آمریکا و کره جنوبی", "topic_description": "اطلاعات مربوط به تمرینات نظامی فنی یا رایانه ای را که پس از اتحاد اصلی ایالات متحده و اجلاس کره شمالی انجام شد ، بیابید."}, {"lang": "fas", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "فنی ایالات متحده و کره جنوبی ورزش نظامی", "topic_description": "اطلاعات مربوط به تمرینات نظامی فنی یا کامپیوتری را که پس از اجلاس اصلی ایالات متحده و کره شمالی برگزار شد ، پیدا کنید."}, {"lang": "zho", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "技术US-South Korean Military Exercise", "topic_description": "在美国和北Korean的上空发现与技术或计算机有关的军事活动有关的信息。"}, {"lang": "rus", "source": "20220114-scale21-sockeye2-tm1", "topic_title": "Технические учения США и Южной Кореи", "topic_description": "Найдите информацию о технических или компьютерных военных учениях, которые прошли после первоначального саммита США и Северной Кореи."}], "narratives": {"fas": {"very_valuable": "simulated computer and technical drills between the US and South Korea.", "somewhat_valuable": "na", "not_that_valuable": "na", "non_relevant": "Info about large exercises, tensions between the US and North Korea, missile tests, letters sent to Trump. Computer game addiction.  US simulating battle against Iran. "}}, "report": {"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foal_Eagle&oldid=845573161", "text": "Foal Eagle (Korean: 독수리 연습) is a combined field training exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and the United States Armed Forces under the auspices of the Combined Forces Command. It is one of the largest military exercises conducted annually in the world. Foal Eagle has been a source of friction with the government of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and domestic ROK critics.\n\nFoal Eagle is an exercise conducted by the US and ROK armed forces, consisting of rear area security and stability operations, onward movement of critical assets to the forward area, special operations, ground maneuver, amphibious operations, combat air operations, maritime action group operations and counter special operations forces exercises (CSOFEX).\n\nThe United Nations Command informs the North Korean People's Army that South Korea and the United States will be conducting the exercise. The United Nations Command also reassured the Korean People's Army at general officer-level talks that these exercises, conducted annually in or around March, are purely defensive in nature[citation needed] and have no connection to ongoing or current events. The Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission monitors the exercise for violations of the Korean Armistice Agreement.\n\nSince 2001, Foal Eagle combined with the annual American-South Korean Reception, Staging, Onward movement, and Integration (RSOI) combined exercises, with RSOI being renamed Key Resolve in 2008. On June 12, 2018, US President Donald Trump announced that the US would abandon the joint military exercises with South Korea.", "date": "2018-06-12"}}