Inscriptions of Israel/Palestine Prinicipal Investigator Michael Satlow

ERROR-could not find publication information which should appear in this space.

jeru0007
jeru0007

Judaea. Jerusalem. 20 BCE to 70 CE. Hard limestone ossuary with relief-carved ornamentation. Funerary.

38+20 75 35

sunken panel front of chest eight-petalled rosettes front, left and ride sides of chest 20 BCE to 70 CE Judaea Jerusalem Kidron Valley southeast of 'En Rogel

Judaea. Jerusalem. Kidron Valley, southeast of Ἑn Rogel.

ERROR: could not find taxonomies file, which should appear in this space.

Creation Normalized objectDesc/@ana Adding Pleiades IDs to origin/placenames adding period attribute to date element, with Periodo value. Rerunning segmentation process with updated workflow

אבונה שמעון סבא יהוסף ברה

our father, Shim'on (the) Elder, Yehosef his son

אבונה שמעון סבא יהוסף ברה

The ossuary has inner ledge on four sides; base is damaged. Comb-dressed. Lid is vaulted with profiled inner rim; its base broadens into a cornice with length 77 cm and width 36.5 cm. Height of the ossuary refers to height of the chest plus that of the lid. Ornamentation consists of two eight-petalled rosettes with rounded tips in a sunken panel on the chest's front side, and one similar rosette each on left and right sides. Back side is roughly hammer dressed. Two possible interpretations of the inscription exist: Mayer reads "Yehosef his son" as the signature of a man reinterring his father (here Shimon), while Savignac and Lidzbarski believe the inscription lists three people with remains in the ossuary, the first being Abinah or Abunah (the word is read here as the epithet "our father," rather than a name). The former interpretation seems more plausible -- the name Abinah/Abunah is attested in Talmudic literature, but during a much later period (200 CE and after) than that of this ossuary; and other inscriptions which describe the joint burial of parent and child contain a conjunctive vav between names, i.e. "Aha and Ya'aqov, his son." The use of אבונה not in reference to the three Patriachs constitutes a violation of a ruling in Sem. 1:12, but not an unusual one.

77-78 plate 2, fig. 12:F plate 2, fig. 12:R plate 2, fig. 12:Lid, R