Inscriptions of Israel/Palestine Prinicipal Investigator Michael Satlow

ERROR-could not find publication information which should appear in this space.

khan0001
Khan 0001

Khirbet el Khan (H. Hanot), 563-609 CE. Mosaic. Dedicatory.

ca. 4 m

563-609 CE Judaea Kh. el Khan31.711670,35.046906 Church

Judaea, Khirbet el Khan (H. Hanot), Church.

ERROR: could not find taxonomies file, which should appear in this space.

Creation Revision added geo coordinates Edited adding period attribute to date element, with Periodo value. updated to merge with kelk0001 added image
Ranbar - Wikimedia

Ἐπὶ τοῦ εὐλαβεστάτου καὶ θεοφιλεστάτου Θεοδώρου πρεσβυτέρου καὶ ἡγουμένου ἐγένετο τὸ πᾶν ἔργον τῆς προσθήκης τής κόνχης καὶ ζωγραφίας καὶ πλακόσεως τοῦ πέρματος τοῦ ἱερατίου σύν τοῦ διακονικοῦ ἐκ θεμελίων, μηνὶ Ἀπριλίῳ ἰνδικτιῶνος ιβ.

Under the most pious and God-loving Theodore, priest and hegumen, was done all the work of the "addition" (προσθήκη) of the apse and of the painting and facing with marble of the end-wall of the presbytery, together with the diaconicon, from the foundations, in the month of April of the 12th indiction.

Ἐπὶ τοῦ εὐλαβεστάτου καὶ θεοφιλεστάτου Θεοδώρου πρεσβυτέρου καὶ ἡγουμένου ἐγένετο τὸ πᾶν ἔργον τῆς προσθήκης τής κόνχης καὶ ζωγραφίας καὶ πλακόσεως τοῦ πέρματος τοῦ ἱερατίου σύν τοῦ διακονικοῦ ἐκ θεμελίων, μηνὶ Ἀπριλίῳ ἰνδικτιῶνος ιβ

Paved mosaic of two rows of black letters with no border. Horvat Hanot seems to have been a road station between Jerusalem and Beth Govrin at which a church was located. The title of hegumen which the priest Theodorus bore suggests that there was also a monastery in this location. The meanings of two words in the inscription are noted to be unclear: πέπμα and προσθήκα. The first, it seems, refers to the back wall of the sanctuary. This wall seems to have been partly faced with marble and, as the editor points out, partly painted with figures (ζωγραφία). She indicates that προσθήκη is a difficult term to deal with, suggesting that it ought to be understood as "addition" in this context, though to what exactly it refers is unclear. Di Sengi dismisses the idea that is refers to an apse, instead proposing that it refers to a nave. She concludes this based upon other its context, other attestations of the word and Lampe's lexicon of Patristic Greek. The issue is further clouded, however, by the only partial nature of the excavation of this site. The dates 563/564 CE, 578/579 CE, 593/594 CE, and 608/609 CE all took place during a twelfth indication and are thus all possible, though the author favors the two latest options as the most likely. The inscription makes use of lunate sigmas and large miniscule omega's rather than their majuscule equivalent.

273